The Oppo A56s and Xiaomi Redmi Note 11R represent a sweet spot in the smartphone market – affordable 5G connectivity. Both devices target budget-conscious consumers, but employ slightly different approaches to achieving that goal. This comparison dissects their core components to determine which phone delivers the best overall experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing faster charging and a slightly more efficient chipset, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11R is the better choice. While the Oppo A56s offers a comparable CPU, the Redmi Note 11R’s 18W charging and 7nm process give it a practical edge in daily use and longevity.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 78 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | CDMA 800 |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, January 05 | 2022, September 30 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, January 09 | Available. Released 2022, September 30 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 163.8 x 75.1 x 8 mm (6.45 x 2.96 x 0.31 in) | 164 x 76.1 x 8.9 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 186 g (6.56 oz) | 201 g (7.09 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~84.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~83.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 400 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 12, ColorOS 12.1 | Android 12, MIUI 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm, AF
Auxiliary lens | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 18W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue | Black, Blue, Gray |
| Models | PFTM20 | 22095RA98C |
| Price | About 150 EUR | About 160 EUR |
Oppo A56s
- Slightly higher CPU clock speed
- Oppo's ColorOS interface (preference-based)
- Potentially lower price (depending on region)
- Slower 10W charging
- Less efficient 6nm Dimensity 810 chipset
- Likely lower sustained performance due to thermal throttling
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11R
- Faster 18W charging
- More efficient 7nm Dimensity 700 chipset
- Potentially better sustained performance
- Xiaomi's MIUI interface (preference-based)
- Slightly lower CPU clock speed
- MIUI can be resource intensive
- Potential for more bloatware
Display Comparison
Neither Oppo nor Xiaomi provide display specifications beyond resolution in their marketing materials. However, given the price point, both likely utilize IPS LCD panels. The real difference lies elsewhere. The lack of detailed display specs makes a direct comparison difficult, but the focus should be on the internal components impacting performance.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a meaningful comparison is limited. Both phones likely feature a primary camera and depth/macro sensors. The image processing algorithms will be the key differentiator, and brand preference plays a large role here. Given the price bracket, expect similar image quality in good lighting conditions, with the Redmi Note 11R potentially benefiting from the more efficient chipset allowing for more complex image processing without overheating.
Performance
The core difference between these phones is their chipset. The Oppo A56s features the Mediatek Dimensity 810, fabricated on a 6nm process, while the Redmi Note 11R uses the Dimensity 700 on a more efficient 7nm node. While the Dimensity 810 boasts slightly higher CPU clock speeds (2.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz), the 7nm process of the Dimensity 700 generally translates to better power efficiency and potentially less thermal throttling under sustained load. Both CPUs share the same core configuration – 2x Cortex-A76 and 6x Cortex-A55 – meaning multi-core performance will be similar, but the Redmi Note 11R will likely maintain performance for longer. The 6nm vs 7nm difference is crucial for long-term usability.
Battery Life
The Redmi Note 11R’s 18W wired charging is a significant advantage over the Oppo A56s’s 10W charging. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging speed will result in considerably quicker top-ups. The Dimensity 700’s 7nm process also contributes to better battery life, as it consumes less power than the Dimensity 810’s 6nm process. This combination makes the Redmi Note 11R the clear winner for users who prioritize battery life and convenience.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A56s if you prioritize a slightly higher CPU clock speed and are comfortable with slower 10W charging. This phone suits users who primarily engage in light tasks and aren't heavily reliant on quick top-ups. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11R if you value faster charging, a more efficient processor, and a generally smoother experience, especially for sustained tasks. This is the better option for users who stream video, game occasionally, or simply dislike waiting for their phone to charge.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Redmi Note 11R's Dimensity 700 handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile?
The Dimensity 700 is capable of running PUBG Mobile, but you'll likely need to lower graphics settings to achieve a consistently smooth frame rate. The 7nm process helps prevent overheating during extended gaming sessions, offering a more stable experience than the Oppo A56s's Dimensity 810.
❓ How long will it take to fully charge each phone from 0%?
With 18W charging, the Redmi Note 11R will likely reach 100% in around 2-2.5 hours, depending on battery capacity. The Oppo A56s, with its 10W charging, will take significantly longer – potentially 4-5 hours for a full charge. This is a major convenience factor favoring the Redmi Note 11R.
❓ Which phone is better for streaming videos and browsing the web?
Both phones are adequate for these tasks, but the Redmi Note 11R’s more efficient chipset will result in longer battery life during extended use. This means you can stream videos or browse the web for a longer period without needing to recharge.
❓ Does the difference in CPU clock speed between the Dimensity 810 and 700 translate to a noticeable difference in everyday tasks?
For most everyday tasks like checking email, social media, and using basic apps, the difference in CPU clock speed will be negligible. The more significant factor is the chipset's efficiency and thermal management, where the Redmi Note 11R’s Dimensity 700 has an advantage.
