Oppo A56s vs Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user, the Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G is the better choice. While both phones share the same Dimensity 810 chipset, the Poco M4 Pro’s significantly faster 33W charging – completing a full charge in just 59 minutes – and slightly higher display contrast ratio offer tangible benefits over the Oppo A56s’ slower 10W charging.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo A56s | Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA - India | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, January 05 | 2021, November 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, January 09 | Available. Released 2021, November 11 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163.8 x 75.1 x 8 mm (6.45 x 2.96 x 0.31 in) | 163.6 x 75.8 x 8.8 mm (6.44 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 186 g (6.56 oz) | 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~399 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~84.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 105.2 cm2 (~84.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 450 nits (typ) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 12, ColorOS 12.1 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, MIUI 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm, AF Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide) |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | Panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 33W wired, 100% in 59 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue | Poco Yellow, Power Black, Cool Blue |
| Models | PFTM20 | 21091116AG, MZB0BGVIN |
| Price | About 150 EUR | About 150 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.07 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.59 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 123h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: 1553:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.9 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 296721 (v8), 353663 (v9) GeekBench: 1797 (v5.1) GFXBench: 13fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo A56s
- Potentially lower price point
- Functional for basic smartphone tasks
- Mediatek Dimensity 810 chipset provides adequate performance
- Extremely slow 10W charging
- Missing display specifications (panel type, color accuracy)
- Limited camera details suggest average performance
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
- 33W fast charging (full charge in 59 minutes)
- 510 nits peak brightness for better outdoor visibility
- Solid battery endurance (123h rating)
- IPS LCD display may not offer the best color accuracy
- Camera specifications lack detail
- May be slightly more expensive than the Oppo A56s
Display Comparison
Both devices feature displays with a 1553:1 contrast ratio, suggesting similar image quality in terms of dynamic range. However, the Poco M4 Pro 5G boasts a measured peak brightness of 510 nits, which will translate to better visibility outdoors compared to the Oppo A56s, where peak brightness isn't specified. The lack of information regarding panel technology (IPS vs AMOLED) for the Oppo A56s makes it difficult to assess color accuracy and viewing angles, but the Poco M4 Pro's specifications suggest a standard IPS LCD.
Camera Comparison
Both phones list 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific details regarding sensor size, aperture, or image stabilization. This makes a direct comparison challenging. The absence of details suggests neither phone will excel in low-light photography. The prevalence of 2MP macro lenses in this segment is likely present on both, offering limited practical utility. Without further information, it’s safe to assume image processing will be the primary differentiator, and Xiaomi generally offers more refined software algorithms.
Performance
The core performance is identical: both the Oppo A56s and Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G are powered by the Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6nm). This octa-core CPU, with its 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 configuration, delivers comparable processing power for everyday tasks and moderate gaming. Thermal management will likely be similar, as the 6nm process node offers reasonable efficiency. The absence of LPDDR5x RAM specifications for either device suggests they likely utilize LPDDR4x, which is standard for this price point, limiting potential performance gains.
Battery Life
The Poco M4 Pro 5G claims an endurance rating of 123 hours, indicating solid battery life. While the Oppo A56s’ battery capacity isn’t specified, the critical difference lies in charging speed. The Poco M4 Pro 5G’s 33W wired charging, capable of a full charge in 59 minutes, is a significant advantage over the Oppo A56s’ sluggish 10W charging. This faster charging dramatically improves usability, especially for users who frequently need to top up their battery throughout the day.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A56s if your primary concern is minimizing upfront cost and you aren’t heavily reliant on fast charging. It’s a functional device for basic tasks. Buy the Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G if you prioritize quicker top-ups, a slightly more vibrant display, and a more complete user experience, even if it means spending a little more.