The smartphone market is brimming with options, making it tough to pick the perfect device. Today, we're pitting the budget-friendly Oppo A56s against the older, but powerful, Xiaomi Mi 9. This comparison will help you understand which phone best suits your needs and budget.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Xiaomi Mi 9 is the clear winner for performance and features, boasting a Snapdragon 855 chipset and faster charging. However, the Oppo A56s offers a more modern design and potentially better value for budget-conscious buyers. It depends on your priorities!
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 39, 40 - Global |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (5CA) Cat18 1200/150 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE |
| | CDMA2000 1x | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - China |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, January 05 | 2019, February 20. Released 2019, March 25 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, January 09 | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.8 x 75.1 x 8 mm (6.45 x 2.96 x 0.31 in) | 157.5 x 74.7 x 7.6 mm (6.20 x 2.94 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 186 g (6.56 oz) | 173 g (6.10 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~84.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.39 inches, 100.2 cm2 (~85.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) | Super AMOLED, HDR10 |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 640 |
| OS | Android 12, ColorOS 12.1 | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 10, MIUI 12.5 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 64GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm, AF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) | - |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
12 MP, f/2.2, 54mm (telephoto), 1/3.6", 1.0µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom
16 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm, PDAF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/120/240fps, 1080p@960fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) | 20 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3", 0.9µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 27W wired, QC4
20W wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 3300 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue | Lavender Violet, Ocean Blue, Piano Black |
| Models | PFTM20 | M1902F1G |
| Price | About 150 EUR | About 590 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.04 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.39 W/kg (head) 1.30 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality | - |
Noise -93.9dB / Crosstalk -91.9dB |
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 95h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal), 3.921 (sunlight) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
Voice 70dB / Noise 74dB / Ring 81dB
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 372006 (v7)
GeekBench: 11181 (v4.4)
GFXBench: 35fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo A56s
- Affordable
- Large Display
- Decent Battery Capacity
- Modern Design
- Slow Charging
- Lower Performance
- Less Powerful Camera
- Older Software Updates
Xiaomi Mi 9
- Powerful Processor
- Fast Charging (Wired & Wireless)
- Excellent Battery Life
- Premium Build Quality
- Better Camera
- Older Model
- Smaller Display
- Potentially Limited Software Updates
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi Mi 9's display, while smaller at 6.39 inches, boasts a superior contrast ratio and likely better color accuracy. The Oppo A56s likely has a larger 6.56-inch display, potentially offering a more immersive viewing experience, but likely with less vibrant colors and lower peak brightness. Both offer FHD+ resolution.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but the Mi 9 likely has a more sophisticated camera system with better image processing. While the A56s camera is decent for its price range, the Mi 9's camera should deliver sharper images, better low-light performance, and more detailed videos. Specific megapixel counts and features would need further research.
Performance
Here, the Xiaomi Mi 9 absolutely dominates. The Snapdragon 855 is significantly more powerful than the Dimensity 810. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading, and better gaming performance on the Mi 9. The A56s is adequate for basic tasks but will struggle with demanding games.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi Mi 9's endurance rating of 95h suggests excellent battery life, likely due to efficient hardware and software optimization. The Oppo A56s has a 5000mAh battery, which is a good capacity, but the Dimensity 810 chipset might not be as power-efficient as the Snapdragon 855. Charging speeds are a significant difference, with the Mi 9 offering 27W wired and 20W wireless charging versus the A56s's slow 10W wired charging.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Oppo A56s? Users seeking an affordable, reliable phone for everyday tasks and social media. Who should buy the Xiaomi Mi 9? Those prioritizing performance, a premium feel, and faster charging, even if it's an older model.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Xiaomi Mi 9 still worth buying in 2024?
Yes, if you prioritize performance and don't mind an older device. It offers flagship-level specs at a discounted price. However, consider software update support.
❓ Which phone has better battery life?
The Xiaomi Mi 9, based on its endurance rating, likely offers better overall battery life, despite having a smaller battery capacity.
