The Oppo A56s and Samsung Galaxy A33 5G represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive budget 5G smartphone market. While both aim to deliver 5G connectivity at an accessible price point, they diverge significantly in their internal hardware and feature sets. This comparison will dissect those differences, helping you determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing faster charging and a potentially more refined software experience, the Samsung Galaxy A33 5G is the better choice. However, the Oppo A56s offers a competitive chipset and represents excellent value if charging speed isn't a primary concern.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, January 05 | 2022, March 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, January 09 | Available. Released 2022, April 20 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 163.8 x 75.1 x 8 mm (6.45 x 2.96 x 0.31 in) | 159.7 x 74 x 8.1 mm (6.29 x 2.91 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 186 g (6.56 oz) | 186 g (6.56 oz) |
| | - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~84.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~83.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) | Super AMOLED, 90Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6 nm) | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G68 |
| OS | Android 12, ColorOS 12.1 | Android 12, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 8 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm, AF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 123˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
5 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue | Black, White, Blue, Peach |
| Models | PFTM20 | SM-A336E, SM-A336B, SM-A336B/DS, SM-A336B/DSN, SM-A336E/DS, SM-A336M, SM-A3360 |
| Price | About 150 EUR | £ 174.99 / € 187.50 / ₹ 21,999 |
| SAR | - | 0.35 W/kg (head) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.57 W/kg (head) 1.59 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 104h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.5 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 354420 (v8), 394918 (v9)
GeekBench: 1900 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 20fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo A56s
- Potentially more raw processing power with the Dimensity 810.
- Competitive price point.
- Decent battery endurance (104h).
- Extremely slow 10W charging.
- Likely inferior display brightness and quality.
- Less refined software experience compared to Samsung.
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
- Faster 25W charging for quick top-ups.
- Brighter display for better outdoor visibility.
- Samsung’s One UI offers a feature-rich software experience.
- Exynos 1280 may throttle under sustained load.
- Potentially higher price compared to the Oppo A56s.
- Camera performance relies heavily on software processing.
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A33 5G boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 728 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the Oppo A56s. This brightness advantage translates to superior visibility in direct sunlight. While both phones likely utilize LCD panels given their price bracket, the A33’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio (nominal) suggests a more optimized panel. The lack of high refresh rate information for the A56s suggests the A33 may offer a smoother scrolling experience if it supports a higher refresh rate (which is typical for this class of Samsung device).
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but detailed sensor information is absent. However, given Samsung’s history, the A33 likely features a more sophisticated camera system with a larger main sensor and potentially Optical Image Stabilization (OIS). The Oppo A56s, while capable, likely relies on software processing to compensate for a potentially smaller sensor. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on many devices in this price range is largely a marketing tactic, offering limited real-world benefit. Image processing style will also differ; Samsung typically favors vibrant, saturated colors, while Oppo often aims for a more natural look.
Performance
The Samsung Galaxy A33 5G’s Exynos 1280 (5nm) chipset holds a clear architectural advantage over the Oppo A56s’ Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6nm). The Exynos 1280 utilizes Cortex-A78 cores, which offer a performance uplift over the A76 cores found in the Dimensity 810. While both CPUs feature the same 2x2.4 GHz core clock speed, the A78’s superior IPC (Instructions Per Clock) will result in faster single-core performance. The 5nm fabrication process of the Exynos 1280 also contributes to improved power efficiency and potentially better sustained performance under load. Both devices share a similar Cortex-A55 efficiency core configuration at 2.0 GHz. The A33's potential for LPDDR5 RAM (common in this series) would further enhance performance compared to the A56s, which likely uses LPDDR4X.
Battery Life
Both the Oppo A56s and Samsung Galaxy A33 5G achieve an Endurance Rating of 104 hours, suggesting comparable battery life under similar usage scenarios. However, the charging speeds differ dramatically. The Samsung Galaxy A33 5G supports 25W wired charging, allowing for a significantly faster 0-100% charge time compared to the Oppo A56s’ slow 10W charging. This difference is crucial for users who need to quickly top up their battery throughout the day. While battery capacity isn't specified, the faster charging of the A33 effectively mitigates any potential capacity disadvantage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A56s if you prioritize raw processing power for everyday tasks and light gaming, and are comfortable with slower 10W charging. This phone is ideal for users who frequently use their device for social media, messaging, and basic productivity. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A33 5G if you value faster 25W charging, a brighter display for outdoor visibility, and the broader ecosystem of Samsung’s software and features. This is the better option for users who consume a lot of video content or take many photos.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Exynos 1280 in the Galaxy A33 5G tend to overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
While the Exynos 1280 is a capable chipset, it's known to exhibit some thermal throttling under sustained heavy load, such as extended gaming. The 5nm process helps, but the A33's cooling solution is likely basic. Expect some performance dips after 30-45 minutes of demanding gameplay.
❓ Is the 2MP macro camera on either of these phones actually useful for taking detailed close-up photos?
Generally, 2MP macro cameras on budget phones offer limited utility. The low resolution results in images lacking detail and sharpness. They are often included as a marketing feature rather than a genuinely useful photographic tool. Expect soft, noisy images from these macro lenses.
❓ Can the Samsung Galaxy A33 5G reliably maintain 60fps in popular games like PUBG Mobile?
The Galaxy A33 5G should be able to maintain 60fps in PUBG Mobile at medium graphics settings. However, achieving consistently smooth frame rates at higher settings may be challenging due to the Exynos 1280's thermal limitations. Expect some frame drops during intense action sequences.
❓ How long does it realistically take to fully charge the Oppo A56s with its 10W charger?
With its 10W charging, the Oppo A56s will take a considerable amount of time to fully charge – likely between 3 to 4 hours from 0% to 100%. This is a significant drawback compared to the A33's 25W charging.
