Oppo A56s vs Oppo A78: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo A78 is the clear winner. While the A56s offers decent performance, the A78's significantly faster charging, slightly better chipset efficiency, and potentially improved camera capabilities make it a more compelling choice for most users, especially considering the price difference is often minimal.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo A56s | Oppo A78 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | IP54 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, January 05 | 2023, January 07 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, January 09 | Available. Released 2023, January 07 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | - |
| Dimensions | 163.8 x 75.1 x 8 mm (6.45 x 2.96 x 0.31 in) | 163.8 x 75.1 x 8 mm (6.45 x 2.96 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 186 g (6.56 oz) | 188 g (6.63 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Panda glass |
| Resolution | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~84.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~84.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 12, ColorOS 12.1 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm, AF Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), PDAF Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0, 27mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0, 27mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 33W wired, PD, 52% in 30 min, 100% in 67 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue | Glowing Black, Glowing Purple |
| Models | PFTM20 | CPH2483, CPH2495 |
| Price | About 150 EUR | € 188.99 / $ 102.92 / ₹ 16,290 |
Oppo A56s
- More affordable (potentially)
- Slightly smaller form factor
- Slow 10W charging
- Less efficient chipset
- Potentially weaker camera
- Slower performance
Oppo A78
- 33W fast charging
- More efficient Dimensity 700 chipset
- Potentially better camera
- Smoother performance
- Modern design
- Slightly more expensive (potentially)
Display Comparison
Both phones likely feature similar display technology (likely an IPS LCD) with comparable resolutions (likely FHD+). The A78 might have slightly better color accuracy or brightness, but this would require specific testing. Screen size is likely similar, around 6.5-6.6 inches.
Camera Comparison
Camera specs are crucial. While both likely have a primary 50MP sensor, the A78 likely has better image processing and potentially additional features like OIS (Optical Image Stabilization). The A78's front-facing camera might also be slightly superior. Expect better low-light performance from the A78.
Performance
The Dimensity 700 in the A78, despite being on a slightly older architecture, benefits from its 7nm process, offering better power efficiency than the A56s' 6nm Dimensity 810. While both have octa-core CPUs with similar core configurations, the A78 should exhibit smoother multitasking and slightly faster app loading times. Gaming performance will be noticeably better on the A78.
Battery Life
The A78's 33W fast charging is a game-changer compared to the A56s' 10W charging. The A78 will charge significantly faster, and the more efficient Dimensity 700 chipset should contribute to slightly better battery life overall, despite potentially having a similar battery capacity (likely around 5000mAh).
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Oppo A56s? Those on the absolute tightest budget who prioritize a slightly smaller form factor and don't mind slower charging. Who should buy the Oppo A78? Anyone looking for a more modern experience with faster charging, potentially better camera performance, and a more efficient chipset, all within a similar price range.