The Oppo A series consistently delivers affordable smartphones packed with essential features. Two contenders vying for your attention are the Oppo A56s and the Oppo A57 4G. But which one offers the best value for your money? Let's dive into a detailed comparison to help you make an informed decision.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo A57 4G emerges as the clear winner thanks to its significantly faster charging (33W vs 10W), a more efficient chipset, and generally better performance. While the A56s has a slightly more powerful CPU core, the A57 4G's overall package is more compelling.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | CDMA2000 1x | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, January 05 | 2022, May 27 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, January 09 | Available. Released 2022, June 06 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 163.8 x 75.1 x 8 mm (6.45 x 2.96 x 0.31 in) | 163.7 x 75 x 8 mm (6.44 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 186 g (6.56 oz) | 187 g (6.60 oz) |
| | - | IP5X (dust), IPX4 (water) resistance |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~84.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6 nm) | Mediatek MT6765G Helio G35 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 12, ColorOS 12.1 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm, AF
Auxiliary lens | 13 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm, AF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 33W wired, 50% in 30 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue | Glowing Black, Glowing Green |
| Models | PFTM20 | CPH2387 |
| Price | About 150 EUR | About 440 EUR |
Oppo A56s
- Slightly more powerful CPU core
- Extremely slow 10W charging
- Less efficient chipset
- Potentially lower overall performance
Oppo A57 4G
- 33W fast charging
- More efficient chipset
- Smoother performance
- Better value for money
- Less powerful CPU core compared to A56s
- Basic camera capabilities
Display Comparison
Both phones likely feature similar display technology (likely IPS LCD) and resolution (likely FHD+). The A57 4G might have slightly better color accuracy or brightness due to potential software optimizations, but this is difficult to confirm without detailed testing. Screen size is likely comparable, around 6.5 inches.
Camera Comparison
Camera specs are likely similar, with both phones featuring a primary 13MP camera and a depth sensor. The A57 4G might have slightly improved image processing due to software enhancements. Low-light performance is likely comparable, but the A56s's more powerful processor could allow for slightly better HDR processing.
Performance
The Oppo A56s boasts the Mediatek Dimensity 810, a 6nm chip, offering a noticeable performance advantage over the A57 4G's Helio G35 (12nm). The Dimensity 810's Cortex-A76 cores provide better single-core performance, while the A57 4G's Helio G35 is more suited for basic tasks and light gaming. Expect smoother multitasking and app loading on the A56s.
Battery Life
The Oppo A57 4G's 33W fast charging is a game-changer compared to the A56s's 10W charging. While both phones likely have a similar battery capacity (around 5000mAh), the A57 4G will charge significantly faster, offering a much more convenient user experience.
Buying Guide
The Oppo A56s is a decent choice for users prioritizing a slightly more powerful CPU for basic tasks and who don't mind slow charging. The Oppo A57 4G is ideal for those seeking faster charging, smoother performance, and a more modern overall experience, especially if budget is a key factor.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The Oppo A56s is slightly better for gaming due to its more powerful chipset, but neither phone is a dedicated gaming device. Expect moderate performance in most games.
❓ How long does it take to fully charge each phone?
The Oppo A56s takes approximately 3+ hours to fully charge with its 10W charger, while the Oppo A57 4G takes around 1 hour and 15 minutes with its 33W charger.
