Both the Oppo A56 5G and Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G occupy the competitive sub-$250 5G smartphone space. While both leverage the Mediatek Dimensity 700 chipset, subtle but important differences in charging speeds, display characteristics, and overall endurance make one a better fit for specific users.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G emerges as the slightly better choice. Its 18W charging significantly outperforms the Oppo A56 5G’s 10W, and the measured 492 nits of brightness provides a more usable outdoor experience, despite both phones sharing the same core processor.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, October 25 | 2021, March 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, November 16 | Available. Released 2021, April 28 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163.8 x 75.6 x 8.4 mm (6.45 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) | 161.8 x 75.3 x 8.9 mm (6.37 x 2.96 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 189.5 g (6.70 oz) | 190 g (6.70 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Panda / Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~82.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~83.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 480 nits (typ) | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 400 nits (typ), 500 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 | Android 11, MIUI 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 4GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 / UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/2.2, 25mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 18W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Violet | Chrome Silver, Graphite Gray, Nighttime Blue, Aurora Green |
| Models | PFVM10 | M2103K19G, M2103K19C |
| Price | About 220 EUR | € 96.62 / £ 107.59 |
| SAR | - | 0.94 W/kg (head) 1.06 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.54 W/kg (head) 0.90 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 121h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1795:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-27.0 LUFS (Good)
|
Oppo A56 5G
- Potentially cleaner software experience (based on Oppo's brand reputation)
- Similar CPU performance to Redmi Note 10 5G
- 5G connectivity at a budget price
- Significantly slower 10W charging
- Lack of published display brightness data suggests lower outdoor visibility
- Limited camera details
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
- Faster 18W wired charging
- Measured 492 nits peak display brightness
- Proven 121-hour battery endurance
- MIUI software can be bloated (based on Xiaomi's brand reputation)
- Similar CPU performance to Oppo A56 5G
- Limited camera details
Display Comparison
Both devices feature displays with a 1795:1 contrast ratio, suggesting similar panel characteristics. However, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G boasts a measured peak brightness of 492 nits, a tangible advantage over the Oppo A56 5G which lacks published brightness data. This difference translates to better visibility under direct sunlight. While both share the same contrast ratio, the Redmi Note 10 5G’s higher brightness makes it the more practical choice for outdoor use.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific details regarding sensor size, aperture, or image processing. Without this information, a direct comparison is impossible. However, given the price point, it’s reasonable to assume both rely on similar budget sensors. The absence of details suggests neither phone is a standout performer in photography, and users shouldn't expect flagship-level image quality. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on either device is likely a marketing feature with limited real-world utility.
Performance
Both the Oppo A56 5G and Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G are powered by the Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7nm) chipset, featuring an octa-core CPU configuration with 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This means CPU performance will be virtually identical in day-to-day tasks and light gaming. The performance bottleneck will likely be RAM and storage speeds, which are not specified in the provided data, but are crucial for multitasking and app loading times. Thermal management will also be similar, as both chips are identical.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G holds a significant advantage in charging speed with its 18W wired charging capability, compared to the Oppo A56 5G’s slower 10W charging. While both phones share an endurance rating of 121 hours, the faster charging of the Redmi Note 10 5G allows for quicker top-ups, reducing downtime. This is particularly beneficial for users who frequently use power-intensive applications or have limited access to charging opportunities. The 121-hour endurance suggests both phones offer all-day battery life under moderate usage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A56 5G if you prioritize a minimalist software experience and are less concerned with fast charging or peak display brightness. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G if you value faster charging, a brighter display for outdoor visibility, and a proven 121-hour endurance rating, making it ideal for users who frequently travel or have limited access to power outlets.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Mediatek Dimensity 700 struggle with demanding games like PUBG or Call of Duty on these phones?
The Dimensity 700 is capable of running PUBG and Call of Duty, but you'll likely need to lower graphics settings to medium or low to maintain a stable frame rate. The chipset isn't designed for ultra-high settings, and thermal throttling could become a factor during extended gaming sessions. Both phones will offer a similar gaming experience due to the identical chipset.
❓ How long does it realistically take to fully charge the Oppo A56 5G with its 10W charger?
With a 10W charger, fully charging the Oppo A56 5G will likely take over 3 hours, potentially closer to 4, depending on the battery's initial state. This is significantly slower than the Redmi Note 10 5G's 18W charging, which can achieve a full charge in around 2 hours.
❓ Is the 121-hour endurance rating of the Redmi Note 10 5G accurate in real-world usage?
The 121-hour endurance rating is based on a standardized test that simulates typical usage patterns. Real-world battery life will vary depending on your usage. Heavy users who stream videos, play games, or use data-intensive apps will experience shorter battery life. However, the Redmi Note 10 5G should still comfortably last a full day for most users.
