The Oppo A series consistently delivers affordable smartphones packed with essential features. Today, we're pitting two contenders against each other: the Oppo A56 5G and the Oppo A57s. Both offer compelling value, but which one reigns supreme in this budget showdown?
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo A57s emerges as the clear winner thanks to its significantly faster charging (33W vs 10W), a more modern chipset (Helio G35), and generally improved performance. While the A56 5G offers 5G connectivity, the A57s provides a better overall user experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | CDMA2000 1x | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, October 25 | 2022, August 31 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, November 16 | Available. Released 2022, September 12 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Panda Glass), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 163.8 x 75.6 x 8.4 mm (6.45 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) | 163.8 x 75 x 8 mm (6.45 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 189.5 g (6.70 oz) | 187 g (6.60 oz) |
| | - | IP5X (dust), IPX4 (water) resistance |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Panda / Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Panda Glass |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~82.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 480 nits (typ) | IPS LCD, 480 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Mediatek MT6765G Helio G35 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 | Android 12, ColorOS 12.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 / UFS 2.2 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/2.2, 25mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | Panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 33W wired, 100% in 69 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Violet | Starry Black, Sky Blue |
| Models | PFVM10 | CPH2385 |
| Price | About 220 EUR | - |
Oppo A56 5G
- 5G Connectivity
- More Powerful Chipset (Dimensity 700)
- Potentially better gaming performance
- Slow 10W Charging
- Less Efficient Chipset
- Potentially lower real-world performance than A57s
Oppo A57s
- 33W Fast Charging
- More Efficient Chipset (Helio G35)
- Likely better real-world performance
- Modern Chipset
- No 5G Connectivity
- Less Powerful Chipset (Helio G35) compared to Dimensity 700
Display Comparison
Both phones likely feature similar display technology (likely IPS LCD) and resolution (likely FHD+). However, the A57s might have slightly better color accuracy or brightness due to potential panel upgrades. We'll need to confirm specific display specs for a definitive comparison.
Camera Comparison
Camera specs are likely similar, with both phones featuring a multi-lens setup including a primary sensor, ultrawide, and macro lens. Image processing algorithms will be a key differentiator. Expect the A57s to potentially offer slightly improved image quality due to software optimizations.
Performance
The Dimensity 700 in the A56 5G is a more powerful chipset than the Helio G35 in the A57s, especially in terms of raw processing power. However, the A57s's chipset is more efficient, potentially leading to better real-world performance and less thermal throttling. The A56 5G's 7nm process also contributes to better efficiency than the A57s's 12nm process.
Battery Life
The A57s boasts a significant advantage with its 33W fast charging, capable of charging the battery in approximately 69 minutes. The A56 5G's 10W charging is considerably slower, taking much longer to reach a full charge.
Buying Guide
The Oppo A56 5G is ideal for users prioritizing 5G connectivity and are comfortable with slower charging speeds. The Oppo A57s is a better choice for those seeking faster charging, smoother performance, and a more modern chipset, even without 5G.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Oppo A56 5G support 5G bands in my region?
Check the specific model number and network compatibility list for your region to ensure 5G band support.
❓ Which phone has better battery life overall?
While both have similar battery capacities, the Oppo A57s's more efficient chipset and faster charging contribute to a better overall battery experience.
