Both the Oppo A56 5G and the OnePlus Nord N10 5G target the budget-conscious consumer seeking 5G connectivity. However, they approach this goal with different chipsets and feature sets. The Nord N10 5G, while older, boasts significantly faster charging, while the A56 5G leverages a newer Mediatek Dimensity 700 processor. This comparison dives deep into the specifics to determine which phone delivers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the OnePlus Nord N10 5G offers a more compelling package. Its 30W charging is a game-changer in this price bracket, offsetting the slightly older chipset. While the Oppo A56 5G benefits from a newer processor, the real-world performance difference isn't substantial enough to outweigh the charging advantage.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 | 1, 3, 7, 28, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1024/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | 2, 5, 25, 41, 66, 71 SA/NSA - USA |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, October 25 | 2020, October 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, November 16 | Available. Released 2020, November 21 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163.8 x 75.6 x 8.4 mm (6.45 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) | 163 x 74.7 x 9 mm (6.42 x 2.94 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 189.5 g (6.70 oz) | 190 g (6.70 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Panda / Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~406 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~82.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.49 inches, 101.7 cm2 (~83.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 480 nits (typ) | IPS LCD, 90Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 560 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 560 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM6350 Snapdragon 690 5G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 619L |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 | Android 10, OxygenOS 10.5 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 / UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/2.2, 25mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.3, 119˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.1 |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with dual speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 30W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4300 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Violet | Midnight Ice |
| Models | PFVM10 | BE2029, BE2025, BE2026, BE2028 |
| Price | About 220 EUR | About 250 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 99h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-25.8 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 279579 (v8)
GeekBench: 1848 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 13fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo A56 5G
- Newer Mediatek Dimensity 700 chipset
- Potentially longer software support from Oppo
- Comparable battery endurance
- Slow 10W charging
- Limited display specifications available
- Camera details are sparse
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
- 30W fast charging
- Measured display brightness and contrast ratio
- Established brand reputation (OnePlus)
- Older Snapdragon 690 chipset
- Battery endurance is similar to the A56 5G
- Software update support may be limited
Display Comparison
The OnePlus Nord N10 5G provides a measured peak brightness of 440 nits and a 1447:1 contrast ratio. While Oppo doesn't provide these specs for the A56 5G, it's reasonable to assume a similar brightness level given its market positioning. The Nord N10's contrast ratio suggests a decent viewing experience, though it's not exceptional. Both phones likely utilize LCD panels, as OLED technology is rare in this price segment. Bezels are expected to be comparable, focusing on maximizing screen real estate within the budget constraints.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but specific details are lacking. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. It's likely both phones employ a multi-camera setup with a primary sensor and supporting lenses (ultrawide, macro, depth). Given the price point, image quality will likely be acceptable in good lighting conditions but struggle in low light. The absence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) on either device suggests reliance on software processing for stabilization.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Oppo A56 5G uses the Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7nm) while the OnePlus Nord N10 5G features the Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G (8nm). The 8nm process of the Snapdragon 690 generally offers better power efficiency than the 7nm Dimensity 700, potentially leading to slightly better battery life under sustained load. However, the Dimensity 700's Cortex-A76 cores (2x2.2 GHz) are architecturally superior to the Kryo 560 Gold cores (2x2.0 GHz) in the Snapdragon 690, suggesting a slight edge in single-core performance. Both CPUs are paired with six Cortex-A55/Kryo 560 Silver cores clocked at 2.0 GHz/1.7 GHz respectively. The real-world performance difference will be minimal for most users, with both phones handling everyday tasks smoothly.
Battery Life
Both the Oppo A56 5G and OnePlus Nord N10 5G achieve an endurance rating of 99 hours, indicating comparable battery life under typical usage. However, the charging speeds are drastically different. The Oppo A56 5G is limited to 10W wired charging, resulting in a significantly longer charge time. The OnePlus Nord N10 5G, with its 30W wired charging, can replenish the battery much faster, offering a substantial convenience factor. A full charge on the Nord N10 5G will take considerably less time than on the A56 5G.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A56 5G if you prioritize a slightly newer processor and potentially longer software support from Oppo. This is a good choice for users who primarily use their phone for basic tasks and don't heavily rely on fast charging. Buy the OnePlus Nord N10 5G if you value rapid charging above all else. The 30W charging capability is a significant convenience, and the Snapdragon 690 still provides adequate performance for everyday use and light gaming.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Snapdragon 690 in the Nord N10 5G still capable of playing modern mobile games?
Yes, the Snapdragon 690 can handle most popular mobile games at medium settings. While it won't deliver the highest frame rates, it provides a playable experience for titles like PUBG Mobile and Call of Duty: Mobile. The Dimensity 700 in the A56 5G offers a slight performance edge, but the difference won't be dramatic.
❓ How long does it realistically take to fully charge the Oppo A56 5G with its 10W charger?
With a 10W charger, the Oppo A56 5G will likely take over 3 hours to fully charge from 0%. This is a significant drawback compared to the Nord N10 5G's 30W charging, which can achieve a full charge in around an hour.
❓ Does the OnePlus Nord N10 5G support VoLTE and 5G on all carriers?
Compatibility with VoLTE and 5G varies by carrier. It's crucial to check with your specific carrier to ensure the Nord N10 5G is fully supported before purchasing. Some carriers may require specific firmware updates for optimal compatibility.
❓ What kind of storage does the Oppo A56 5G use, and is it expandable?
While not explicitly stated, budget phones like the A56 5G typically use UFS 2.1 storage. Expandability via microSD card is likely, but the maximum supported capacity should be verified before purchase.
