The Oppo A55 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Lite represent compelling options in the crowded budget smartphone market. Both aim to deliver essential features at an accessible price point, but they diverge significantly in their core hardware. This comparison dissects those differences, focusing on the impact of their respective chipsets and how that translates to real-world performance and user experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing responsiveness and future-proofing, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Lite is the better choice. Its Snapdragon 720G chipset, built on a more efficient 8nm process, provides a noticeable performance advantage over the Oppo A55’s Helio G35, making it better suited for multitasking and gaming.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, October 01 | 2021, October 01 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, October 01 | Available. Released 2021, October 02 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163.6 x 75.7 x 8.4 mm (6.44 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) | 165.8 x 76.7 x 8.8 mm (6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 193 g (6.81 oz) | 209 g (7.37 oz) |
| | - | Water-repellent coating |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | NEG T2X-1 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.51 inches, 102.3 cm2 (~82.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~84.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 480 nits (typ), 550 nits (peak) | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 465 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765G Helio G35 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G (8 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Adreno 618 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 | Android 10, MIUI 11 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 48 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
5 MP (macro), AF
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8 26mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | FM radio, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 18W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5020 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Rainbow Blue, Starry Black, Green | Aurora Blue, Glacier White, Interstellar Black, Champagne Gold |
| Models | CPH2325 | M2002F4LG |
| Price | £ 100.00 | About 200 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.17 W/kg (head) 0.86 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.01 W/kg (head) 1.39 W/kg (body) |
Oppo A55
- Potentially longer software support from Oppo.
- Simple and straightforward user experience.
- Reliable for basic smartphone tasks.
- Significantly weaker performance compared to the Redmi Note 10 Lite.
- Less efficient chipset leading to potential throttling.
- Limited gaming capabilities.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Lite
- Superior performance thanks to the Snapdragon 720G.
- More efficient chipset for better battery life.
- Smoother multitasking and gaming experience.
- Potentially shorter software update support from Xiaomi.
- MIUI software can be resource-intensive.
- May experience more bloatware.
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. While specific panel details (like peak brightness or color gamut coverage) are unavailable, the core difference lies in the processing power driving them. Both likely utilize LCD panels, common in this price bracket. The more powerful Snapdragon 720G in the Redmi Note 10 Lite will contribute to smoother scrolling and faster app loading times, indirectly enhancing the perceived display experience. Bezels are expected to be similar, reflecting the budget nature of both devices.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs beyond the chipsets, a direct comparison is limited. However, the image signal processor (ISP) within the Snapdragon 720G is generally more capable than the ISP found in the Helio G35. This means better noise reduction, dynamic range, and overall image quality, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. While both phones likely feature a primary camera, the Redmi Note 10 Lite’s chipset will enable more sophisticated image processing algorithms. The presence of a more powerful ISP is more impactful than sensor size differences typically found in this price range.
Performance
The performance gap is the most significant differentiator. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Lite’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (8nm) is a substantial upgrade over the Oppo A55’s MediaTek Helio G35 (12nm). The 8nm process inherently offers better power efficiency, leading to less heat generation and potentially reduced throttling during sustained workloads. The Snapdragon 720G’s CPU configuration – 2x2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 465 Silver – is architecturally more advanced than the A55’s 4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53. This translates to faster single-core and multi-core performance, benefiting everything from app launch speeds to gaming. The Redmi Note 10 Lite will handle demanding applications and multitasking with greater ease.
Battery Life
Both devices feature 18W wired charging, suggesting similar charging speeds – approximately 2-3 hours for a full charge. Battery capacity is not specified, but the Snapdragon 720G’s superior power efficiency in the Redmi Note 10 Lite could translate to slightly longer battery life despite potentially having a similar capacity to the Oppo A55. The 8nm process allows the Redmi Note 10 Lite to accomplish more per watt, extending usage time between charges.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A55 if you need a basic, reliable smartphone for everyday tasks like calling, texting, and light social media use, and prioritize a potentially longer software support lifecycle from Oppo. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Lite if you prefer a smoother, more responsive experience, enjoy occasional gaming, and value the performance benefits of Qualcomm’s Snapdragon chipset, even if it means potentially shorter software update support.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Redmi Note 10 Lite struggle with graphically demanding games like PUBG Mobile?
While not a flagship gaming phone, the Snapdragon 720G in the Redmi Note 10 Lite is capable of running PUBG Mobile at medium settings with a stable frame rate. Expect some frame drops during intense firefights, but it's a playable experience. The Oppo A55’s Helio G35 will likely struggle to maintain a consistent frame rate even at lower settings.
❓ How does Xiaomi's MIUI software affect the performance of the Redmi Note 10 Lite?
MIUI is known for being feature-rich but also somewhat resource-intensive. While the Snapdragon 720G can handle it, users may notice some slight slowdowns or bloatware. However, many of these issues can be mitigated by disabling unnecessary features and uninstalling pre-installed apps.
❓ Is the 18W charging on either phone considered fast charging in 2024?
18W charging is relatively standard for budget phones in 2024, and isn't considered 'fast' by current standards. Expect a full charge to take around 2-3 hours. Neither phone offers significantly faster charging capabilities.
