The Motorola Moto G50 5G and Oppo A55 represent two distinct approaches to the budget smartphone market. The G50 prioritizes 5G connectivity and a more powerful processor, while the A55 focuses on a streamlined experience and potentially better software support within the Oppo ecosystem. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you determine which aligns best with your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing performance and future-proofing, the Motorola Moto G50 5G is the better choice. Its Mediatek Dimensity 700 chipset delivers significantly faster processing speeds and 5G capabilities, outweighing the Oppo A55’s slightly more efficient charging. However, those seeking a simpler, potentially more polished software experience might prefer the A55.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - Australia |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 - Australia |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Australia |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, October 01 | 2021, August 25 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, October 01 | Available. Released 2021, August 25 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163.6 x 75.7 x 8.4 mm (6.44 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) | 167 x 76.4 x 9.3 mm (6.57 x 3.01 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 193 g (6.81 oz) | 206 g (7.27 oz) |
| | - | Water-repellent design |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | NEG T2X-1 | - |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.51 inches, 102.3 cm2 (~82.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.8 cm2 (~80.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 480 nits (typ), 550 nits (peak) | IPS LCD, 90Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765G Helio G35 (12 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 | Android 11 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8 26mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) | 13 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 15W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Rainbow Blue, Starry Black, Green | Meteorite Grey |
| Models | CPH2325 | XT2149-1 |
| Price | £ 100.00 | About 170 EUR |
Oppo A55
- Faster charging (18W)
- Potentially cleaner software experience
- Slightly more compact design (likely)
- Significantly weaker processor (Helio G35)
- No 5G connectivity
- Limited gaming performance
Motorola Moto G50 5G
- Faster processor (Dimensity 700)
- 5G connectivity
- Better thermal management
- Slower charging (15W)
- Potentially more bloatware
- Larger form factor (likely)
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both likely utilize LCD panels, a common cost-saving measure in this segment. The key difference lies under the hood: display processing. While specific display specs are unavailable, the G50’s more powerful chipset can likely drive a smoother visual experience, especially during scrolling and video playback. Bezels are expected to be similar, reflecting the budget nature of both phones. Color accuracy is likely to be standard for this price point, prioritizing saturation over precise calibration.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is likely to be similar, with both phones relying on budget sensors and image processing. Without specific sensor details, it’s difficult to make definitive claims. However, the G50’s more powerful ISP (Image Signal Processor) within the Dimensity 700 chipset *could* offer slightly better image processing capabilities, particularly in low-light conditions. Expect both phones to struggle with dynamic range and detail in challenging lighting scenarios. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on both devices is largely a marketing gimmick, offering limited practical benefit due to the small sensor size and lack of autofocus.
Performance
The performance gap is the most significant differentiator. The Motorola Moto G50 5G’s Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7nm) is a substantial upgrade over the Oppo A55’s Mediatek Helio G35 (12nm). The Dimensity 700 features a more modern CPU architecture – Cortex-A76 cores versus the A53 cores in the Helio G35 – resulting in a noticeable performance boost in CPU-intensive tasks. The 7nm process also contributes to better thermal efficiency, meaning the G50 is less likely to throttle under sustained load. This translates to smoother gaming, faster app loading times, and a more responsive overall user experience. The G50’s CPU configuration (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) is demonstrably more capable than the A55’s (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53).
Battery Life
The Oppo A55’s 18W charging is slightly faster than the Moto G50 5G’s 15W charging. However, the Dimensity 700’s superior efficiency could offset this difference in real-world usage. The G50’s larger battery capacity (specific mAh not provided, but likely similar or slightly larger based on device size) will contribute to longer battery life, especially when utilizing 5G connectivity. Expect both phones to comfortably last a full day with moderate usage, but heavy gaming or video streaming will drain the battery faster on the G50 due to its more powerful processor.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A55 if you need a reliable, basic smartphone for everyday tasks like calling, texting, and light social media use, and value a potentially cleaner software experience. Buy the Motorola Moto G50 5G if you prioritize faster performance for gaming and multitasking, require 5G connectivity for faster data speeds, and are comfortable with a potentially more feature-rich, but less refined, software experience.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Motorola Moto G50 5G’s 5G connectivity significantly impact battery life?
Yes, utilizing 5G will consume more battery than 4G LTE. However, the Dimensity 700’s 7nm process is relatively efficient, and the G50 likely has a larger battery capacity to compensate. You can mitigate battery drain by switching to 4G when 5G isn’t necessary.
❓ Is the Helio G35 in the Oppo A55 powerful enough for casual gaming like Candy Crush or Subway Surfers?
Yes, the Helio G35 can handle less demanding games like Candy Crush or Subway Surfers without significant issues. However, it will struggle with more graphically intensive titles like PUBG Mobile or Call of Duty Mobile, even at lower settings.
❓ Does the Motorola Moto G50 5G support VoLTE and VoWiFi?
Generally, Motorola phones with 5G support also include VoLTE (Voice over LTE) and VoWiFi (Voice over Wi-Fi) capabilities. However, compatibility depends on your carrier, so it’s best to check with your provider to confirm support.
❓ How much storage does each phone offer, and is it expandable?
While specific storage configurations aren't provided, both phones likely offer 64GB or 128GB of internal storage. Both are expected to include a microSD card slot for expandable storage, allowing you to add more space for photos, videos, and apps.
