The Oppo A54 and Tecno Camon 17 Pro both target the budget-conscious smartphone user, but they approach the market with different strengths. The A54 prioritizes affordability, while the Camon 17 Pro aims for a more compelling camera and performance package. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device delivers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Tecno Camon 17 Pro is the superior choice. Its Helio G95 chipset provides a substantial performance uplift over the A54’s Helio P35, and the faster 25W/33W charging significantly reduces downtime. While both offer similar battery endurance ratings, the Camon 17 Pro’s overall capabilities justify the potential price difference.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | LTE |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, March 26 | 2021, May 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, April 01 | Available. Released 2021, June 03 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 163.6 x 75.7 x 8.4 mm (6.44 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) | 168.9 x 77 x 9 mm (6.65 x 3.03 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 201 g (7.09 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.51 inches, 102.3 cm2 (~82.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.8 inches, 109.8 cm2 (~84.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 500 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.35 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6785V/CD Helio G95 (12 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Mali-G76 MC4 |
| OS | Android 10, ColorOS 7.2 | Android 11, HIOS 7.6 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Quad-LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.3, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP, f/2.4, (monochrome)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 48 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 13 MP, f/2.2, 25mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | Dual-LED flash |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 48 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with dual speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 25W / 33W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Crystal Black, Starry Blue | California Silver, Malibu Blue |
| Models | CPH2239 | CG8, CG8h |
| Price | About 160 EUR | About 280 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 140h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 781:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-24.4 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 309107 (v8)
GeekBench: 1668 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo A54
- Lower price point makes it accessible.
- Reliable for basic smartphone tasks.
- Decent battery endurance.
- Significantly weaker performance.
- Slower charging speed.
- Likely inferior camera quality.
Tecno Camon 17 Pro
- Much faster performance with Helio G95.
- Faster charging (25W/33W).
- Potentially better camera capabilities.
- Higher price compared to the Oppo A54.
- May not be a significant upgrade for very basic users.
- Similar battery endurance to A54 despite faster charging.
Display Comparison
Both phones feature similar contrast ratios at 781:1, suggesting comparable image depth. However, the Tecno Camon 17 Pro boasts a measured peak brightness of 538 nits, which will translate to better visibility outdoors compared to the Oppo A54, whose brightness is not specified. While neither display is likely to be class-leading in color accuracy, the higher brightness of the Camon 17 Pro provides a tangible advantage in real-world usability.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are marketed with a focus on photography, but the Tecno Camon 17 Pro likely holds an edge. While both offer 'Photo/Video' capabilities, the Camon 17 Pro benefits from the more powerful ISP within the Helio G95 chipset, enabling better image processing. Without specific sensor details for either phone, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment, but the G95’s processing power suggests superior low-light performance and dynamic range. The A54’s camera system is likely more basic, relying on software enhancements to compensate for less capable hardware.
Performance
The performance gap between these two devices is significant. The Tecno Camon 17 Pro’s MediaTek Helio G95, with its 2x Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.05 GHz and 6x Cortex-A55 cores at 2.0 GHz, is a substantial upgrade over the Oppo A54’s Helio P35. The P35 utilizes older Cortex-A53 cores across all eight threads, clocked lower at 2.35 GHz and 1.8 GHz. This architectural difference means the Camon 17 Pro will handle multitasking, demanding apps, and gaming with considerably more fluidity. The G95’s Mali-G76 MC4 GPU also provides a more capable graphics experience.
Battery Life
Both the Oppo A54 and Tecno Camon 17 Pro achieve an endurance rating of 140 hours, indicating similar battery life under typical usage. However, the Tecno Camon 17 Pro’s charging capabilities are far superior, offering 25W/33W wired charging compared to the A54’s 18W. This faster charging translates to significantly reduced downtime, allowing users to quickly top up their battery when needed. While both will last a full day for most users, the Camon 17 Pro offers greater convenience.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A54 if you need a reliably basic smartphone for essential tasks like calls, messaging, and light social media use, and your budget is extremely limited. Buy the Tecno Camon 17 Pro if you prioritize a smoother user experience, better gaming performance, and a more versatile camera system, even if it means spending a bit more.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Tecno Camon 17 Pro’s Helio G95 chipset capable of playing demanding games like PUBG Mobile?
Yes, the Helio G95 is specifically designed for gaming. It offers a significant performance boost over the Helio P35 in the Oppo A54, allowing for smoother frame rates and a more enjoyable gaming experience in titles like PUBG Mobile. While it won't match flagship-level performance, it's more than capable of handling most mobile games at medium to high settings.
❓ How long does it realistically take to fully charge the Tecno Camon 17 Pro with the 25W/33W charger?
While the exact charging time depends on various factors, the Tecno Camon 17 Pro, with its 25W/33W charging support, should fully charge from 0% to 100% in approximately 1 hour and 30 minutes to 2 hours. This is considerably faster than the Oppo A54’s 18W charging, which would likely take over 2.5 hours for a full charge.
❓ Does the Oppo A54 have any features that the Tecno Camon 17 Pro lacks?
The Oppo A54 may have certain software features or design elements specific to the Oppo ecosystem. However, based on the available specifications, the Tecno Camon 17 Pro offers a more compelling hardware package overall, particularly in terms of performance and charging speed. The A54's primary advantage is its lower price.
