The Oppo A54 and Nokia G20 represent two approaches to the ultra-budget smartphone market. The A54 aims for a slightly more polished experience, while the G20 prioritizes longevity and Nokia’s clean Android promise. Both utilize Mediatek’s Helio series, but subtle differences in chipset and charging could sway your decision.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Oppo A54 offers a slightly better experience due to its marginally faster chipset and significantly quicker 18W charging. While the Nokia G20 benefits from Nokia’s software support, the performance gap and slower charging make it less compelling for those prioritizing responsiveness and convenience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 28, 66 - LATAM |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, March 26 | 2021, April 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, April 01 | Available. Released 2021, May 17 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 163.6 x 75.7 x 8.4 mm (6.44 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) | 164.9 x 76 x 9.2 mm (6.49 x 2.99 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 197 g (6.95 oz) |
| | - | Splash protection |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.51 inches, 102.3 cm2 (~82.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~81.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.35 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6765G Helio G35 (12 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 10, ColorOS 7.2 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
5 MP, (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 8 MP, (wide) |
| Triple | 13 MP, f/2.2, 25mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 8 MP, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 10W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5050 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Crystal Black, Starry Blue | Glacier, Night |
| Models | CPH2239 | TA-1336, TA-1343, TA-1347, TA-1372, TA-1365 |
| Price | About 160 EUR | About 90 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.01 W/kg (head) 1.02 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.49 W/kg (head) 1.13 W/kg (body) |
Oppo A54
- Faster 18W charging for quicker power-ups.
- Slightly more powerful Helio P35 chipset.
- Potentially more vibrant image processing.
- Software update commitment may be shorter than Nokia.
- Likely uses more aggressive background app management.
Nokia G20
- Guaranteed software updates from Nokia.
- Clean Android experience with minimal bloatware.
- Potentially better battery optimization through software.
- Slower 10W charging is inconvenient.
- Helio G35 chipset is marginally less powerful.
- May lack some of the software features found on Oppo’s ColorOS.
Display Comparison
Neither Oppo nor Nokia provide display specifications beyond size. However, given the price point, both likely utilize LCD panels. The real difference lies elsewhere. The focus here is on the internal components impacting the user experience, not display quality which is expected to be similar in this segment.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are sparse for both devices. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. It’s safe to assume both phones feature basic camera setups geared towards social media sharing rather than professional photography. The inclusion of a 2MP macro lens on either device is largely a marketing tactic, offering minimal practical benefit due to the low resolution and lack of optical image stabilization (OIS). Image processing will likely be the differentiating factor, with Oppo typically favoring more vibrant, saturated images, while Nokia aims for a more natural look.
Performance
The Oppo A54 features the Mediatek Helio P35, while the Nokia G20 uses the Helio G35. Both are octa-core chips with the same Cortex-A53 core configuration (4x2.35 GHz & 4x1.8 GHz for the P35, and 4x2.3 GHz & 4x1.8 GHz for the G35). The G35’s slight clock speed reduction is unlikely to be noticeable in daily use, but the P35’s GPU may offer a marginal advantage in gaming. Both rely on shared system memory, so RAM capacity (not specified) will be a significant bottleneck. The 12nm process node is consistent across both, meaning thermal performance will be comparable, but the A54’s slightly faster CPU could lead to marginally higher temperatures under sustained load.
Battery Life
Battery capacity isn’t specified for either device, but both likely house around a 5000mAh battery, typical for this price range. The critical difference is charging speed: the Oppo A54 supports 18W wired charging, while the Nokia G20 is limited to 10W. This translates to a significantly faster 0-100% charge time for the A54 – potentially under 2 hours versus over 3 hours for the G20. For users who value convenience and quick top-ups, the A54’s faster charging is a major advantage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A54 if you need a phone that feels a bit snappier for everyday tasks and appreciate faster charging to minimize downtime. This is ideal for users who frequently use social media, browse the web, or play casual games. Buy the Nokia G20 if you prioritize long-term software support and a clean Android experience, and are willing to trade off some performance and charging speed for that peace of mind. This suits users who value simplicity and guaranteed updates.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Nokia G20 receive Android version updates beyond its initial release?
Nokia is known for its commitment to software updates, even on budget devices. The G20 is guaranteed to receive at least two years of Android version upgrades and three years of security patches, providing longer-term software support than the Oppo A54 is likely to offer.
❓ Is the difference in chipset performance between the Helio P35 and Helio G35 noticeable in everyday use?
The difference is subtle. Both chipsets are designed for basic tasks like browsing, social media, and messaging. You might notice a slight improvement in app loading times and smoother multitasking on the Oppo A54, but it won’t be a dramatic difference. Gaming performance will be similar, limited by the shared system memory and the GPUs in both chips.
❓ How long will it take to fully charge each phone from 0%?
With 18W charging, the Oppo A54 should fully charge in approximately 1 hour and 45 minutes to 2 hours. The Nokia G20, with its 10W charging, will take significantly longer – likely exceeding 3 hours, potentially closer to 3.5-4 hours, depending on usage during charging.
