The Oppo A54 and Motorola Moto G50 5G represent two approaches to the affordable smartphone market. The A54 prioritizes power efficiency with its Helio P35 chipset, while the Moto G50 5G aims for a performance boost with the more modern Dimensity 700, bringing 5G connectivity into the mix. This comparison dissects the key differences to help you choose the right phone for your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Motorola Moto G50 5G is the better choice. While its 15W charging is slower than the Oppo A54’s 18W, the Dimensity 700 chipset provides a substantial performance uplift, making it more capable for multitasking, gaming, and future-proofing with 5G support.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - Australia |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 - Australia |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Australia |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, March 26 | 2021, August 25 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, April 01 | Available. Released 2021, August 25 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163.6 x 75.7 x 8.4 mm (6.44 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) | 167 x 76.4 x 9.3 mm (6.57 x 3.01 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 206 g (7.27 oz) |
| | - | Water-repellent design |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.51 inches, 102.3 cm2 (~82.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.8 cm2 (~80.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 90Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.35 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 10, ColorOS 7.2 | Android 11 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | - |
| Triple | 13 MP, f/2.2, 25mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 13 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 15W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Crystal Black, Starry Blue | Meteorite Grey |
| Models | CPH2239 | XT2149-1 |
| Price | About 160 EUR | About 170 EUR |
Oppo A54
- Faster wired charging (18W)
- Potentially longer battery life due to efficient chipset (though unconfirmed)
- Likely more affordable
- Significantly weaker performance due to older chipset
- No 5G connectivity
- Less future-proof
Motorola Moto G50 5G
- Much faster performance with Dimensity 700
- 5G connectivity for faster data speeds
- More efficient chipset for potentially better battery life under load
- Slower wired charging (15W)
- Potentially higher price
- May experience more heat under heavy load
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both likely utilize LCD panels, a common cost-saving measure in this segment. The focus here isn't on visual fidelity, but on functionality. Without specific display specs, it's reasonable to assume similar resolutions and brightness levels. The real differentiator will be software optimizations for color accuracy, which are brand-specific and difficult to predict without testing.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, the chipset plays a role. The Dimensity 700 includes an ISP (Image Signal Processor) capable of handling more complex image processing tasks, potentially leading to better dynamic range and low-light performance on the Moto G50 5G. The A54’s Helio P35 ISP is less sophisticated. It’s likely both phones will feature a primary camera and several auxiliary lenses (often 2MP macro/depth sensors), but the quality of the main sensor and the image processing algorithms will be the key determinants of image quality.
Performance
The performance gap between these two phones is significant. The Motorola Moto G50 5G’s Mediatek Dimensity 700, built on a 7nm process, is a clear upgrade over the Oppo A54’s Mediatek Helio P35 (12nm). The Dimensity 700 features more powerful Cortex-A76 cores (2x2.2 GHz) compared to the A54’s Cortex-A53 cores (4x2.35 GHz), resulting in noticeably faster application loading times and smoother multitasking. The 7nm process also contributes to better thermal efficiency, meaning the G50 5G is less likely to throttle under sustained load. While the A54 has eight cores, the older architecture and larger process node limit its overall performance.
Battery Life
The Oppo A54’s 18W wired charging is faster than the Moto G50 5G’s 15W charging. This means the A54 will likely reach 100% charge more quickly. However, battery life isn’t solely determined by charging speed. The more efficient Dimensity 700 in the Moto G50 5G could offset the slower charging by consuming less power during typical usage. Without knowing the battery capacities of each device, it’s hard to say which will last longer on a single charge, but the G50’s chipset efficiency is a significant advantage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A54 if you prioritize long battery life and basic smartphone functionality, and are less concerned with demanding apps or 5G connectivity. It’s ideal for users who primarily browse the web, use social media, and make calls. Buy the Motorola Moto G50 5G if you want a more responsive experience, enjoy mobile gaming, or plan to take advantage of 5G networks. It’s the better option for users who need a phone that can handle more intensive tasks and offers future-proof connectivity.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Motorola Moto G50 5G get noticeably warmer than the Oppo A54 during gaming?
The Dimensity 700 is more powerful, and therefore generates more heat under sustained load. While the 7nm process helps with efficiency, the Moto G50 5G is likely to get warmer than the Oppo A54 during extended gaming sessions. However, this doesn't necessarily mean it will throttle performance significantly, but it's a factor to consider.
❓ Is the 5G connectivity on the Moto G50 5G actually useful if 5G coverage is limited in my area?
Even with limited 5G coverage, the Moto G50 5G will fall back to 4G LTE. The Dimensity 700 also offers improved 4G LTE performance compared to the Helio P35, meaning you may see faster data speeds even without 5G. The 5G modem also future-proofs the device for when 5G coverage expands.
❓ Does the Oppo A54's Helio P35 chipset struggle with modern app updates?
Yes, the Helio P35 is an older chipset and may struggle with increasingly demanding app updates. You might experience slower loading times, lag, and reduced responsiveness as apps become more resource-intensive. This is a key limitation of the A54.
