Oppo A53s vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S: A Deep Dive into Budget Smartphone Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S emerges as the stronger choice. Its Helio G95 chipset provides a noticeable performance uplift for gaming and demanding apps, and the 33W fast charging significantly reduces downtime. While the Oppo A53s offers decent efficiency, the Redmi Note 10S’s advantages outweigh its slightly higher power consumption.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo A53s | Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - Version 1, Version 3 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - Version 1 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 - Version 3 | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, October 12. Released 2020, October 17 | 2021, March 04 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2021, April 28 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 163.9 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm (6.45 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) | 160.5 x 74.5 x 8.3 mm (6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 186 g (6.56 oz) | 178.8 g (6.31 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~82.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~83.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits (typ) | AMOLED, 450 nits (typ), 1100 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x1.8 GHz Kryo 240 & 4x1.6 GHz Kryo 240) | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4250 Snapdragon 460 (11 nm) | Mediatek MT6785V/CD Helio G95 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Mali-G76 MC4 |
| OS | Android 10, ColorOS 7.2 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, MIUI 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 (single lane) | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | - | 13 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm |
| Triple | 13 MP, f/2.2, 25mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm, PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 13 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 33W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Electric Black, Fancy Blue | Deep Sea Blue (Ocean Blue), Shadow Black (Onyx Gray), (Frost White) Pebble White |
| Models | CPH2139, CPH2135 | M2101K7BG, M2101K7BI, M2101K7BNY, M2101K7BL |
| Price | About 110 EUR | € 101.48 / £ 135.82 / ₹ 13,999 |
| SAR | 0.77 W/kg (head) 0.97 W/kg (body) | 1.07 W/kg (head) 0.81 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.90 W/kg (body) |
Oppo A53s
- Potentially better battery efficiency due to Snapdragon 460.
- Slightly lower price point (likely).
- Clean and simple software experience (typical of Oppo).
- Significantly weaker performance compared to the Helio G95.
- Slower 18W charging.
- Less capable GPU for gaming.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
- Faster and more powerful Helio G95 chipset.
- 33W fast charging for quicker top-ups.
- Better GPU performance for gaming.
- Potentially superior camera image processing.
- Slightly higher power consumption.
- May run slightly warmer under heavy load.
- Xiaomi’s MIUI can be more resource-intensive.
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both likely feature LCD panels, common in this segment. However, the focus here is on the chipset impact on display smoothness. The Redmi Note 10S’s more powerful GPU can potentially drive higher frame rates in games, even if the panel itself is a standard 60Hz. We expect similar color accuracy and brightness levels, but the Helio G95’s graphical capabilities give the Redmi Note 10S a slight edge in visual responsiveness.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, the Redmi Note 10S likely benefits from MediaTek’s Imagiq image signal processor, which generally offers better noise reduction and dynamic range compared to the ISP found in the Snapdragon 460. The Redmi Note 10S’s more powerful chipset also allows for faster image processing, potentially leading to quicker capture times and better low-light performance. We anticipate both phones will include a standard macro lens, but the primary sensor quality and software processing will be the key differentiators, favoring the Redmi Note 10S.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S’s MediaTek Helio G95 (12nm) is a clear step up from the Oppo A53s’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 (11nm). The G95 features a dual-cluster configuration with 2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, offering significantly better multi-core performance than the Snapdragon 460’s 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 240 & 4x1.6 GHz Kryo 240 setup. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more enjoyable gaming experience. While the Snapdragon 460’s 11nm process is slightly more efficient, the G95’s architectural advantages outweigh this benefit for most users.
Battery Life
The Redmi Note 10S’s 33W wired charging is a major advantage. This will significantly reduce charging times compared to the Oppo A53s’s 18W charging. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging speed effectively mitigates any potential difference in mAh. Users who frequently top up their phones will greatly appreciate the convenience of the Redmi Note 10S. The Snapdragon 460’s efficiency in the A53s will contribute to longer standby times, but the G95’s faster charging will likely result in more overall usable time for the average user.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A53s if you prioritize long-term battery life and a consistently smooth experience for basic tasks like browsing and social media. Its Snapdragon 460 is optimized for efficiency. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S if you’re a casual gamer, frequently use resource-intensive apps, or value faster charging speeds. The Helio G95 offers a tangible performance boost, and the 33W charging is a game-changer in this price bracket.