Poco X3 Pro vs Oppo A53s: A Detailed Comparison for Budget-Conscious Buyers
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing gaming and demanding performance, the Poco X3 Pro is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 860 chipset offers a substantial performance leap over the Oppo A53s' Snapdragon 460. However, for basic tasks and users on a tighter budget, the Oppo A53s provides a functional experience at a lower price point.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo A53s | Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - Version 1, Version 3 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - Version 1 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 - Version 3 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 - India | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, October 12. Released 2020, October 17 | 2021, March 22 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2021, March 24 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), plastic back |
| Dimensions | 163.9 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm (6.45 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) | 165.3 x 76.8 x 9.4 mm (6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 186 g (6.56 oz) | 215 g (7.58 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~82.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~84.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits (typ) | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 2404Hz PWM, HDR10, 450 nits (typ) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x1.8 GHz Kryo 240 & 4x1.6 GHz Kryo 240) | Octa-core (1x2.96 GHz Kryo 485 Gold & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 Gold & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4250 Snapdragon 460 (11 nm) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 640 |
| OS | Android 10, ColorOS 7.2 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 (single lane) | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1.0µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | - | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 13 MP, f/2.2, 25mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm, PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 1080p@960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 33W wired, 59% in 30 min, 100% in 59 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5160 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Electric Black, Fancy Blue | Phantom Black, Frost Blue, Metal Bronze |
| Models | CPH2139, CPH2135 | M2102J20SG, M2102J20SI |
| Price | About 110 EUR | $ 128.04 / £ 249.99 |
| SAR | 0.77 W/kg (head) 0.97 W/kg (body) | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.67 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.57 W/kg (head) 0.90 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 112h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: 1401:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.1 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 453223 (v8) GeekBench: 2574 (v5.1) GFXBench: 38fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo A53s
- More affordable price point
- Decent battery endurance
- Functional for basic tasks
- Significantly weaker processor
- Slower charging speed
- Limited gaming capabilities
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
- Powerful Snapdragon 860 processor
- Fast 33W wired charging
- Superior gaming performance
- Higher price tag
- Potentially more heat generation under load
- Similar battery endurance to A53s despite faster charging
Display Comparison
Both devices share a nominal contrast ratio of 1401:1, suggesting similar visual pop. However, detailed display specs like peak brightness and panel type are missing for the Oppo A53s. The Poco X3 Pro’s display, while not explicitly detailed beyond the contrast ratio, benefits from the processing power of its chipset to render games and videos smoothly. Without knowing the Oppo A53s’ panel technology, it’s difficult to assess its color accuracy or viewing angles relative to the Poco X3 Pro.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but specific details are absent. Without sensor size, aperture, or image processing details, a direct comparison is impossible. However, given the Poco X3 Pro’s more powerful chipset, it’s likely to offer superior image processing capabilities, potentially resulting in better dynamic range and low-light performance. The Oppo A53s will likely rely more heavily on software processing, which may not be as effective without the underlying hardware to support it. It's reasonable to assume the Poco X3 Pro will offer more versatile video recording options.
Performance
The performance gap is the most significant differentiator. The Poco X3 Pro’s Snapdragon 860 (7nm) is a substantial upgrade over the Oppo A53s’ Snapdragon 460 (11nm). The 860 features a Kryo 485 core configuration with a prime core clocked at 2.96 GHz, designed for sustained performance. In contrast, the Snapdragon 460’s Kryo 240 cores, maxing out at 1.8 GHz, are geared towards efficiency rather than raw power. This translates to significantly faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a far superior gaming experience on the Poco X3 Pro. The 7nm process node of the 860 also contributes to better thermal efficiency, reducing throttling during extended gaming sessions.
Battery Life
Both devices boast an endurance rating of 112 hours, suggesting comparable battery life under similar usage conditions. However, the Poco X3 Pro’s 33W wired charging is a significant advantage, achieving 59% charge in 30 minutes and 100% in 59 minutes. The Oppo A53s’ 18W charging is considerably slower, implying a longer time to fully recharge. While both have similar endurance, the Poco X3 Pro’s faster charging mitigates the impact of battery drain, offering more convenience for power users.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A53s if you need a reliable smartphone for basic communication, social media, and light web browsing, and value affordability above all else. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro if you prioritize mobile gaming, demanding applications, and future-proofing, and are willing to spend more for a significantly more powerful processor and faster charging.