Realme Narzo 30 5G vs Oppo A53s: A Deep Dive into Budget 5G Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing responsiveness and future-proofing, the Realme Narzo 30 5G is the clear winner. Its MediaTek Dimensity 700 chipset provides a substantial performance advantage over the Oppo A53s’ Snapdragon 460, making it better suited for multitasking, gaming, and 5G applications. Both offer similar charging speeds, but the Narzo 30 5G’s processing power justifies the slight price difference.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo A53s | Realme Narzo 30 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - Version 1, Version 3 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - Version 1 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 - Version 3 | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, October 12. Released 2020, October 17 | 2021, May 26 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2021, June 11 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 163.9 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm (6.45 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) | 162.5 x 74.8 x 8.5 mm (6.40 x 2.94 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 186 g (6.56 oz) | 185 g (6.53 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | - |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~82.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~83.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits (typ) | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits (typ), 600 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x1.8 GHz Kryo 240 & 4x1.6 GHz Kryo 240) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4250 Snapdragon 460 (11 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 10, ColorOS 7.2 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, Realme UI 3.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 (single lane) | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.1, 26mm (wide) |
| Triple | 13 MP, f/2.2, 25mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm, PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.1, 26mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 18W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Electric Black, Fancy Blue | Racing Blue, Racing Silver |
| Models | CPH2139, CPH2135 | RMX3242 |
| Price | About 110 EUR | About 110 EUR |
| SAR | 0.77 W/kg (head) 0.97 W/kg (body) | - |
Oppo A53s
- Potentially lower price point
- Functional for basic tasks
- 5G connectivity
- Significantly weaker performance
- Less efficient chipset
- Likely limited gaming capabilities
Realme Narzo 30 5G
- Superior performance with Dimensity 700
- More efficient 7nm process
- Better suited for gaming and multitasking
- Potentially slightly higher price
- May not offer a dramatically better camera experience
- Similar charging speed to Oppo A53s
Display Comparison
Neither Oppo nor Realme provide detailed display specifications in the provided data. However, given the price bracket, both likely utilize LCD panels. The key differentiator will be color accuracy and peak brightness, which are unknown. Bezels are likely comparable, aiming for maximizing screen real estate within the budget constraints. Without further data, a definitive display winner cannot be determined.
Camera Comparison
Without sensor size or aperture information, a detailed camera comparison is limited. Both phones likely feature a multi-camera setup, but the quality will heavily depend on the primary sensor and image processing algorithms. It’s reasonable to assume both will include a standard wide lens and potentially a depth sensor. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on either device is unlikely to provide significant photographic value. The Dimensity 700’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) may offer slightly better image processing capabilities, but this is speculative without detailed testing.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Realme Narzo 30 5G’s MediaTek Dimensity 700, fabricated on a 7nm process, offers a significant advantage over the Oppo A53s’ Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 (11nm). The Dimensity 700’s octa-core configuration, featuring 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, provides substantially more processing power than the Snapdragon 460’s 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 240 & 4x1.6 GHz Kryo 240. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more enjoyable gaming experience on the Narzo 30 5G. The 7nm process also contributes to better thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during sustained workloads.
Battery Life
Both devices share 18W wired charging, suggesting similar charging speeds – approximately 2-3 hours for a full charge. Battery capacity isn’t specified, but given the segment, both likely fall in the 4000-5000 mAh range. The Dimensity 700’s superior power efficiency could translate to slightly better battery life on the Realme Narzo 30 5G, offsetting any potential difference in battery capacity.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A53s if you need a basic, functional 5G phone for light tasks like calls, messaging, and occasional social media browsing, and are on a very tight budget. Buy the Realme Narzo 30 5G if you prefer a smoother, more responsive experience, plan to use 5G frequently, or enjoy mobile gaming – the Dimensity 700 offers a noticeable upgrade in performance.