Motorola Moto G60S vs Oppo A53s: A Detailed Performance and Value Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Motorola Moto G60S is the superior choice. Its Helio G95 chipset provides a noticeable performance boost over the Oppo A53s’ Snapdragon 460, and the 50W charging is a game-changer. While the A53s is cheaper, the G60S’s extra power and convenience justify the price difference.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo A53s | Motorola Moto G60S |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - Version 1, Version 3 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - Version 1 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 28, 40, 66 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 - Version 3 | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, October 12. Released 2020, October 17 | 2021, August 12 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2021, August 12 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 163.9 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm (6.45 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) | 169.7 x 75.9 x 9.6 mm (6.68 x 2.99 x 0.38 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 186 g (6.56 oz) | 212 g (7.48 oz) |
| - | Water repellent design | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | - |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~82.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.8 inches, 109.8 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits (typ) | IPS LCD, 120Hz, HDR10, 450 nits (typ), 562 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x1.8 GHz Kryo 240 & 4x1.6 GHz Kryo 240) | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4250 Snapdragon 460 (11 nm) | Mediatek MT6785V/CD Helio G95 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Mali-G76 MC4 |
| OS | Android 10, ColorOS 7.2 | Android 11 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 (single lane) | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚, (ultrawide) 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Triple | 13 MP, f/2.2, 25mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm, PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/120fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | LED flash, HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 50W wired, QC4 |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Electric Black, Fancy Blue | Green, Blue |
| Models | CPH2139, CPH2135 | XT2133-2, XT2133-1 |
| Price | About 110 EUR | About 200 EUR |
| SAR | 0.77 W/kg (head) 0.97 W/kg (body) | - |
Oppo A53s
- Lower price point makes it very accessible.
- Sufficient for basic smartphone tasks.
- Likely lighter and more compact due to less powerful hardware.
- Significantly slower performance compared to the Moto G60S.
- Slow 18W charging.
- Camera quality likely inferior due to weaker ISP.
Motorola Moto G60S
- Faster and more responsive performance thanks to the Helio G95.
- 50W fast charging with QC4 support.
- Potentially better camera quality due to a more capable ISP.
- Higher price compared to the Oppo A53s.
- May experience more heat under sustained load.
- Potentially larger and heavier than the A53s.
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. While specific display specs (resolution, panel type) are missing for both, the focus here is on the underlying performance difference. The chipset powering the display processing is a key factor, and the Helio G95 in the Moto G60S will likely deliver smoother scrolling and faster response times compared to the Snapdragon 460 in the A53s. Bezels are likely comparable given the price points, and color accuracy is expected to be average on both.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the chipset’s image signal processor (ISP) plays a crucial role. The Helio G95’s ISP is more capable than the Snapdragon 460’s, meaning the G60S will likely produce better image quality, especially in challenging lighting conditions. The A53s likely relies heavily on software processing to compensate for its weaker ISP. The presence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) on the G60S (assuming it's included, based on Motorola's typical offerings) would further enhance image quality and video stabilization, a feature likely absent on the A53s.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Motorola Moto G60S’s Mediatek Helio G95 (12nm) is a substantial upgrade over the Oppo A53s’ Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 (11nm). The G95 features a more powerful CPU configuration – 2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 cores alongside 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores – compared to the A53s’ 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 240 & 4x1.6 GHz Kryo 240. This translates to significantly faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a better gaming experience on the G60S. The 12nm process node of the Helio G95 also allows for potentially better sustained performance under load, though thermal management will still be a factor. The Snapdragon 460 is adequate for basic tasks, but will struggle with demanding applications.
Battery Life
While battery capacity isn't specified, the real differentiator is charging speed. The Motorola Moto G60S’s 50W wired charging with Quick Charge 4 (QC4) support is a massive advantage. This allows for a significantly faster 0-100% charge time compared to the Oppo A53s’ 18W charging. Even if the A53s has a slightly larger battery, the G60S’s faster charging mitigates any potential endurance concerns. The convenience of quickly topping up the battery is a significant benefit for many users.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A53s if you need a basic smartphone for essential tasks like calls, messaging, and light social media use, and your budget is extremely limited. Buy the Motorola Moto G60S if you prioritize smoother multitasking, occasional gaming, and significantly faster charging – even if it means spending a bit more. The G60S is ideal for users who want a phone that can keep up with a moderately demanding lifestyle.