Infinix Note 10 Pro NFC vs Oppo A53s: Which Budget Phone Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing performance and quick top-ups, the Infinix Note 10 Pro NFC is the clear winner. Its Helio G95 chipset and 33W charging significantly outperform the Oppo A53s’ Snapdragon 460 and 18W charging. However, the A53s remains a viable option for those seeking a basic, reliable device.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo A53s | Infinix Note 10 Pro NFC |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - Version 1, Version 3 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - Version 1 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 40, 66 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 - Version 3 | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, October 12. Released 2020, October 17 | 2021, May 12 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2021, June 07 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 163.9 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm (6.45 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) | 172.8 x 78.3 x 7.8 mm (6.80 x 3.08 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 186 g (6.56 oz) | - |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | - |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~387 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~82.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.95 inches, 114.7 cm2 (~84.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits (typ) | IPS LCD, 90Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x1.8 GHz Kryo 240 & 4x1.6 GHz Kryo 240) | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4250 Snapdragon 460 (11 nm) | Mediatek MT6785V/CD Helio G95 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Mali-G76 MC4 |
| OS | Android 10, ColorOS 7.2 | Android 11, XOS 7.6 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 (single lane) | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.3, 120˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP, f/2.4, (monochrome) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | - | 16 MP, (wide) |
| Triple | 13 MP, f/2.2, 25mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm, PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.09" |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with dual speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 33W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Electric Black, Fancy Blue | Black, Purple, Nordic Secret |
| Models | CPH2139, CPH2135 | X695C |
| Price | About 110 EUR | - |
| SAR | 0.77 W/kg (head) 0.97 W/kg (body) | - |
Oppo A53s
- Reliable Qualcomm chipset for basic tasks
- Potentially more software optimization due to Oppo's brand reputation
- Simpler user experience
- Significantly slower charging speed (18W)
- Less powerful chipset for gaming and multitasking
- Likely lower camera performance
Infinix Note 10 Pro NFC
- Faster and more powerful MediaTek Helio G95 chipset
- Significantly faster 33W wired charging
- Potentially better camera performance due to ISP
- MediaTek chipsets sometimes have a reputation for less consistent software updates
- May experience more bloatware compared to Oppo
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a flagship-level display. While specific display specs (resolution, panel type) are missing, the focus here is on the underlying chipset's ability to drive the display efficiently. The A53s' Snapdragon 460 will likely handle standard HD+ displays adequately, but may struggle with demanding graphics. The Note 10 Pro NFC’s Helio G95, being a more powerful processor, is better equipped to handle higher refresh rates or more complex visuals, should the display support them. The absence of detailed display specs makes a direct comparison difficult, but the G95’s processing power suggests a smoother visual experience.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera sensor information, a precise comparison is challenging. However, the Helio G95’s image signal processor (ISP) is generally more capable than the Snapdragon 460’s. This means the Note 10 Pro NFC is likely to produce better-quality photos, especially in challenging lighting conditions. The ISP handles noise reduction, dynamic range, and overall image processing. While both phones likely feature a multi-camera setup, the G95’s processing power will give it an edge in post-processing and potentially enable features like better HDR or night mode performance. We can assume both phones will include standard features like portrait mode, but the Infinix will likely deliver more refined results.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Infinix Note 10 Pro NFC’s MediaTek Helio G95 (12nm) is a substantial upgrade over the Oppo A53s’ Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 (11nm). The G95 features a dual-cluster configuration with 2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, offering significantly better multi-core performance than the A53s’ 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 240 & 4x1.6 GHz Kryo 240 setup. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more enjoyable gaming experience on the Infinix. The 12nm process node of the G95 also allows for potentially better power efficiency under load compared to the 11nm Snapdragon 460, despite the latter's lower clock speeds.
Battery Life
The Infinix Note 10 Pro NFC’s 33W wired charging is a game-changer compared to the Oppo A53s’ 18W charging. This means significantly faster top-up times – potentially going from 0-100% in under an hour, versus a considerably longer duration on the A53s. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging speed is a major advantage for users who frequently find themselves needing to quickly replenish their battery. The more efficient Helio G95 chipset may also contribute to slightly better battery life under heavy use, offsetting any potential capacity differences.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A53s if you need a dependable smartphone for basic tasks like calling, texting, and light social media use, and value simplicity over raw power. Buy the Infinix Note 10 Pro NFC if you prefer a more responsive experience for gaming, multitasking, and appreciate the convenience of significantly faster charging speeds, making it ideal for users on the go.