The smartphone market is brimming with options, making it tough to choose. Today, we're pitting two popular contenders against each other: the Oppo A53s 5G and the Samsung Galaxy A54. Both offer compelling features, but cater to slightly different needs and budgets. Let's dive in!
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A54 is the clear winner, offering a superior display, significantly faster charging, a more powerful chipset, and a generally more polished experience. While the Oppo A53s 5G is more budget-friendly, the A54's overall performance and features justify the price difference.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 25, 41, 66, 71 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - USA |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, April 27 | 2023, March 15 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, May 07 | Available. Released 2023, March 24 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164 x 75.7 x 8.4 mm (6.46 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) | 158.2 x 76.7 x 8.2 mm (6.23 x 3.02 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 189.6 g (6.70 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| | - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~82.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 100.5 cm2 (~82.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 480 nits (typ) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G68 MP5 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 13 MP, f/2.2, 25mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.X", 1.12µm
5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@480fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer (USA only) |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Crystal Blue, Ink Black | Lime, Graphite, Violet, White |
| Models | CPH2321 | SM-A546V, SM-A546U, SM-A546U1, SM-A546B, SM-A546B/DS, SM-A546E, SM-A546E/DS, SM-A5460, SM-A546M, SM-A546M/DS, SM-A546W |
| Price | About 170 EUR | € 210.00 / $ 119.11 / £ 169.95 / ₹ 28,999 |
| SAR | - | 0.81 W/kg (head) 0.67 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.69 W/kg (head) 1.34 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 119h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.6 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 506678 (v9)
GeekBench: 2703 (v5.1), 2797 (v6)
GFXBench: 25fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo A53s 5G
- Affordable
- 5G Connectivity
- Decent Performance for Basic Tasks
- Slow Charging
- Less Powerful Chipset
- Mediocre Display
- Lower Camera Quality
Samsung Galaxy A54
- Excellent Display
- Powerful Chipset
- Superior Camera
- Long Battery Life
- Fast Charging
- Premium Build Quality
- Higher Price
- No expandable storage
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A54 boasts a significantly brighter display (980 nits peak) with an 'infinite' contrast ratio, offering richer colors and deeper blacks. The Oppo A53s 5G's display is adequate but lacks the vibrancy and outdoor visibility of the A54. The A54's display also likely has better color accuracy.
Camera Comparison
The Galaxy A54's camera system is a clear advantage. While specific megapixel counts might be similar, Samsung's image processing and overall camera hardware are superior, resulting in better photos and videos in various lighting conditions. The A53s 5G's camera is decent for casual snapshots but lacks the detail and dynamic range of the A54.
Performance
The Exynos 1380 in the Galaxy A54 is noticeably faster and more efficient than the Mediatek Dimensity 700 in the Oppo A53s 5G. The A54's Cortex-A78 cores provide a substantial performance boost for demanding tasks and gaming. The A53s 5G is sufficient for everyday use, but struggles with heavier workloads.
Battery Life
Both phones offer good battery life, but the Galaxy A54 shines with its exceptional endurance rating (119h) and active use score (11:15h). The Oppo A53s 5G's battery life is respectable, but falls short of the A54's longevity. The A54 also has significantly faster 25W charging compared to the A53s 5G's 10W.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Oppo A53s 5G? It's ideal for budget-conscious users who prioritize 5G connectivity and basic smartphone functionality. Who should buy the Samsung Galaxy A54? It's perfect for users who want a premium experience with a vibrant display, excellent camera, long battery life, and faster charging, without breaking the bank.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Oppo A53s 5G worth buying in 2024?
It's a budget option for basic 5G needs, but the Samsung Galaxy A54 offers significantly better value overall.
❓ Does the Samsung Galaxy A54 have expandable storage?
No, the Galaxy A54 does not offer expandable storage via microSD card.
❓ What is the difference between the Exynos 1380 and the Dimensity 700?
The Exynos 1380 is a more powerful and efficient chipset, offering better performance and graphics capabilities compared to the Dimensity 700.