The mid-range 5G smartphone market is booming, and the Oppo A53s 5G and Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G are two strong contenders. Both offer 5G connectivity and a host of features, but which one delivers the best overall experience? Let's dive into a detailed comparison to help you make the right choice.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G emerges as the clear winner, boasting a superior chipset, faster charging, a brighter display, and generally better camera performance. While the Oppo A53s 5G is a more budget-friendly option, the A52s 5G offers a more premium and well-rounded experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, April 27 | 2021, August 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, May 07 | Available. Released 2021, September 01 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164 x 75.7 x 8.4 mm (6.46 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) | 159.9 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm (6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 189.6 g (6.70 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| | - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~82.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 480 nits (typ) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 642L |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, One UI 6 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm
5 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 13 MP, f/2.2, 25mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual Proximity Sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Ion 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Crystal Blue, Ink Black | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Purple, Awesome Mint |
| Models | CPH2321 | SM-A528B, SM-A528B/DS, SM-A528N |
| Price | About 170 EUR | £ 112.98 / € 249.47 |
| SAR | - | 0.72 W/kg (head) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.88 W/kg (head) 0.84 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 113h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-27.5 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 429675 (v8), 506432(v9)
GeekBench: 11060 (v4.4), 2801 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 28fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo A53s 5G
- Affordable
- 5G Connectivity
- Decent Battery Life
- Slower Performance
- Slow Charging
- Less Bright Display
- Basic Camera
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
- Powerful Snapdragon 778G 5G
- Fast 25W Charging
- Bright and Vibrant Display
- Better Camera Performance
- Premium Build Quality
- More Expensive
- Potentially Larger Size/Weight
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G takes the display crown with its measured 800 nits max brightness, offering significantly better visibility in outdoor conditions. While the Oppo A53s 5G has a decent display, it lacks the A52s 5G's brightness and contrast. The A52s 5G's 'Infinite' contrast ratio (nominal) suggests deeper blacks and richer colors, though this is a marketing term.
Camera Comparison
While both phones offer capable cameras, the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G generally produces better photos and videos. The A52s 5G's image processing tends to be more refined, resulting in more vibrant and detailed images. Low-light performance is also likely to be better on the A52s 5G. Specific camera specs (megapixels, aperture) would need to be compared for a more granular analysis.
Performance
The Snapdragon 778G 5G in the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G is a substantial upgrade over the Mediatek Dimensity 700 in the Oppo A53s 5G. Expect noticeably faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance on the A52s 5G. The A53s 5G is adequate for everyday tasks but struggles with demanding applications.
Battery Life
Both phones boast an impressive endurance rating of 113h, suggesting excellent battery life. However, the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G's 25W wired charging is significantly faster than the Oppo A53s 5G's 10W charging, allowing for quicker top-ups.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Oppo A53s 5G? Budget-conscious users seeking a basic 5G experience. Who should buy the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G? Users prioritizing performance, camera quality, and a more premium feel, and are willing to spend a bit more.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Oppo A53s 5G good for gaming?
The Oppo A53s 5G can handle basic games, but demanding titles may experience lag or reduced frame rates due to its less powerful chipset.
❓ Which phone has better software support?
Samsung generally offers longer software update support than Oppo, so the Galaxy A52s 5G is likely to receive updates for a longer period.