The Oppo A53 and Motorola Moto G9 Plus represent two distinct approaches to the budget smartphone market. The A53 prioritizes a streamlined experience with a focus on affordability, while the Moto G9 Plus aims for a more robust feature set, headlined by a more powerful processor. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device delivers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Motorola Moto G9 Plus is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 730G chipset provides a significantly faster and more responsive experience than the Oppo A53’s Snapdragon 460, justifying the potential price difference. While both offer similar battery endurance, the G9 Plus’s 30W charging is a clear advantage.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 28, 66 Brazil |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, August 20. Released 2020, August 25 | 2020, September 07. Released 2020, September 07 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163.9 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm (6.45 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) | 170 x 78.1 x 9.7 mm (6.69 x 3.07 x 0.38 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 186 g (6.56 oz) | 223 g (7.87 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | - |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~386 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~82.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.81 inches, 112.0 cm2 (~84.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | IPS LCD, HDR10 |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x1.8 GHz Kryo 240 & 4x1.6 GHz Kryo 240) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 470 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 470 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4250 Snapdragon 460 (11 nm) | Qualcomm SDM730 Snapdragon 730G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 618 |
| OS | Android 10, upgradable to Android 11 | Android 10, upgradable to Android 11 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Triple | 13 MP, f/2.2, 25mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.0, 29mm (standard) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 30W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Fairy White, Electric Black, Fancy Blue | Rose Gold, Indigo Blue |
| Models | CPH2127, CPH2131 | XT2087-1 |
| Price | £ 158.16 / € 169.99 | About 300 EUR |
| SAR | 0.77 W/kg (head) 0.97 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 136h |
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1356:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-29.0 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 253105 (v8)
GeekBench: 1695 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 15fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo A53
- Extremely affordable price point
- Decent battery endurance for basic use
- Lightweight and easy to handle
- Weak Snapdragon 460 processor
- Slower 18W charging
- Likely inferior camera performance
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
- Powerful Snapdragon 730G chipset
- Faster 30W wired charging
- Brighter display for outdoor visibility
- Potentially higher price tag
- Larger size and weight
- May not offer significant camera improvements over competitors in its price range
Display Comparison
Both phones feature similar contrast ratios at 1356:1, suggesting comparable image depth. However, the Moto G9 Plus boasts a measured peak brightness of 522 nits, offering a noticeably more visible display in direct sunlight compared to the Oppo A53, which lacks published brightness data. While both likely utilize IPS LCD panels, the G9 Plus’s higher brightness makes it more versatile for outdoor use.
Camera Comparison
Both devices offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed camera specs are limited. Without sensor size or aperture information, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, the Snapdragon 730G’s image signal processor (ISP) in the Moto G9 Plus is more advanced, potentially leading to better image processing, dynamic range, and low-light performance. The A53’s ISP is less capable, likely resulting in less refined images. We can assume both phones include standard features like HDR, but the G9 Plus will likely have more sophisticated algorithms.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Motorola Moto G9 Plus’s Snapdragon 730G (8nm) is a substantial upgrade over the Oppo A53’s Snapdragon 460 (11nm). The 730G’s Kryo 470 Gold cores, clocked at 2.2 GHz, deliver significantly faster processing speeds than the A53’s 1.8 GHz Kryo 240 cores. This translates to smoother app launches, quicker multitasking, and a more enjoyable gaming experience. The 8nm process also contributes to better thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of performance throttling under sustained load.
Battery Life
Both the Oppo A53 and Motorola Moto G9 Plus achieve an endurance rating of 136 hours, indicating similar overall battery life. However, the Moto G9 Plus’s 30W wired charging is a significant advantage over the A53’s 18W charging. This means the G9 Plus can replenish its battery much faster, minimizing downtime. While both will likely last a full day for moderate users, the G9 Plus offers greater convenience when a quick top-up is needed.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A53 if you prioritize extreme affordability and basic smartphone functionality for tasks like calls, messaging, and light social media use. You’ll be content with its performance for these simple tasks. Buy the Motorola Moto G9 Plus if you value smoother multitasking, better gaming performance, and faster charging. It’s the better option for users who want a phone that can handle more demanding applications and provide a more future-proof experience.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 730G in the Moto G9 Plus handle demanding games like PUBG or Call of Duty?
Yes, the Snapdragon 730G is capable of running PUBG and Call of Duty at medium to high settings with playable frame rates. While it won’t deliver a flagship-level gaming experience, it provides a significantly smoother and more enjoyable gaming experience compared to the Oppo A53’s Snapdragon 460.
❓ How long does it realistically take to fully charge the Motorola Moto G9 Plus with the 30W charger?
With the included 30W charger, the Motorola Moto G9 Plus can typically charge from 0% to 100% in approximately 65-75 minutes. This is considerably faster than the Oppo A53, which will take significantly longer with its 18W charger.
❓ Is the camera on the Moto G9 Plus a significant upgrade over the Oppo A53, even without detailed sensor specs?
While specific sensor details are missing, the Moto G9 Plus benefits from a more powerful image signal processor (ISP) within the Snapdragon 730G. This ISP handles image processing, noise reduction, and dynamic range, resulting in generally better photo and video quality compared to the Oppo A53.
