Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T vs Oppo A53 5G: A Deep Dive into Budget 5G Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T emerges as the stronger choice. Its Mediatek Dimensity 800U chipset provides a noticeable performance uplift over the Oppo A53 5G’s Dimensity 720, coupled with faster 18W charging. While both offer similar battery endurance, the Redmi Note 9T’s superior processing power justifies its slight price premium.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo A53 5G | Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42 |
| 5G bands | 1, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, December 18. Released 2020, December 21 | 2021, January 08 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2021, January 18 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 162.2 x 75 x 7.9 mm (6.39 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) | 161.2 x 77.3 x 9.1 mm (6.35 x 3.04 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 175 g (6.17 oz) | 199 g (7.02 oz) |
| - | Water-repellent coating | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~83.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.53 inches, 104.7 cm2 (~84.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits (typ) | IPS LCD, 450 nits (typ) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 720 (7 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 800U (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 | Mali-G57 MC3 |
| OS | Android 10, ColorOS 7.2 | Android 10, MIUI 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 - 64GB UFS 2.2 - 128GB | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 5 MP, AF | - |
| Triple | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 13 MP, f/2.3, 29mm (standard), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 18W wired, 33% in 30 min |
| Stand-by | Up to 200 h | - |
| Talk time | Up to 3 h 30 min | - |
| Type | Li-Po 4040 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Green, Purple | Nightfall Black, Daybreak Purple |
| Models | PECM30, PECT30 | M2007J22G, J22 |
| Price | About 160 EUR | About 130 EUR |
| SAR | 0.85 W/kg (head) 0.79 W/kg (body) | 1.07 W/kg (head) 1.05 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.59 W/kg (head) 0.94 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 118h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: 1226:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.3 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 288732 (v8) GeekBench: 1775 (v5.1) |
Oppo A53 5G
- Potentially lower price point
- Acceptable battery endurance
- 5G connectivity
- Slower Dimensity 720 chipset
- Slow 10W charging
- Likely less responsive user experience
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T
- Faster Dimensity 800U chipset
- Faster 18W charging with quick boost
- Brighter display (471 nits)
- Potentially higher price
- Similar battery endurance to Oppo A53 5G
- Standard 60Hz display
Display Comparison
Both the Oppo A53 5G and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T share a contrast ratio of 1226:1, suggesting similar visual depth. However, the Redmi Note 9T boasts a measured peak brightness of 471 nits, offering a brighter viewing experience, particularly outdoors. While neither display is exceptional, the Redmi Note 9T’s higher brightness provides a tangible advantage in real-world usability. Details regarding panel technology (IPS vs. AMOLED) and refresh rates are missing, but given the price point, both likely utilize standard 60Hz IPS LCDs.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but specific details regarding sensor size, aperture, or image processing are absent. Without this information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, given Xiaomi’s generally more aggressive camera tuning, the Redmi Note 9T likely offers a more vibrant and detailed image, though this is speculative. The absence of details suggests both phones likely feature a standard camera setup for their price range, prioritizing versatility over flagship-level image quality. The usefulness of any included 2MP macro lenses on either device is questionable.
Performance
The core difference between these two devices lies in their chipsets. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T’s Mediatek Dimensity 800U features a faster CPU configuration with 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 cores compared to the Oppo A53 5G’s 2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A76 cores. This 20% clock speed increase translates to snappier app launches and smoother performance in demanding applications. Both utilize the same 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 efficiency cores, but the 800U’s superior CPU and GPU will provide a more responsive user experience, especially for gaming. The Redmi Note 9T is better equipped to handle graphically intensive titles.
Battery Life
Both the Oppo A53 5G and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T achieve an endurance rating of 118 hours, indicating comparable battery life under similar usage conditions. However, the Redmi Note 9T offers a significant advantage in charging speed with 18W wired charging, capable of delivering 33% charge in just 30 minutes. The Oppo A53 5G is limited to a slower 10W charging rate, resulting in a considerably longer time to fully recharge the battery. This faster charging capability on the Redmi Note 9T is a practical benefit for users who frequently need to top up their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A53 5G if your primary concern is minimizing upfront cost and you primarily engage in basic smartphone tasks like calling, texting, and light social media browsing. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T if you prioritize smoother multitasking, occasional gaming, and faster charging speeds, even if it means spending a bit more.