Oppo A53 5G vs Motorola Moto G 5G: A Deep Dive into Budget 5G Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing faster charging and potentially slightly better sustained performance, the Motorola Moto G 5G is the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 750G chipset, coupled with 20W charging, provides a smoother experience and quicker top-ups. However, the Oppo A53 5G remains a viable option for those seeking a different chipset architecture.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo A53 5G | Motorola Moto G 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43 |
| 5G bands | 1, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, December 18. Released 2020, December 21 | 2020, November 05. Released 2020, December 07 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 162.2 x 75 x 7.9 mm (6.39 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) | 166.1 x 76.1 x 9.9 mm (6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 175 g (6.17 oz) | 212 g (7.48 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~83.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~85.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits (typ) | IPS LCD, HDR10 |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 570) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 720 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 10, ColorOS 7.2 | Android 10 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 2GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 5 MP, AF | - |
| Triple | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm 2 MP (macro), AF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio, RDS |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 20W wired |
| Stand-by | Up to 200 h | - |
| Talk time | Up to 3 h 30 min | - |
| Type | Li-Po 4040 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Green, Purple | Volcanic Gray, Frosted Silver |
| Models | PECM30, PECT30 | - |
| Price | About 160 EUR | About 90 EUR |
| SAR | 0.85 W/kg (head) 0.79 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 131h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: 1419:1 |
| Loudspeaker | - | -28.1 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 312461 (v8) GeekBench: 1980 (v5.1) GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo A53 5G
- MediaTek Dimensity 720 chipset offers a different processing experience.
- Comparable battery endurance to the Motorola Moto G 5G.
- Potentially lower price point depending on retailer.
- Significantly slower 10W charging.
- Lacks detailed display specifications (brightness, color accuracy).
- Chipset architecture is less efficient than Snapdragon 750G.
Motorola Moto G 5G
- Faster 20W wired charging for quicker top-ups.
- Snapdragon 750G chipset provides better performance and efficiency.
- Measured display brightness of 484 nits for improved visibility.
- Similar battery endurance to the Oppo A53 5G despite faster charging.
- Camera specifications are not detailed.
- May be slightly more expensive than the Oppo A53 5G.
Display Comparison
Both devices share a contrast ratio of 1419:1, indicating similar levels of black depth and color vibrancy. However, the Motorola Moto G 5G boasts a measured peak brightness of 484 nits, a significant advantage over the Oppo A53 5G (brightness data unavailable). This higher brightness translates to better visibility in direct sunlight. While both likely utilize LCD panels given their price point, the Motorola’s measured performance suggests a more refined display calibration.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack detailed camera specifications in the provided data. Without sensor size, aperture, or OIS information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, given the market segment, it’s reasonable to assume both rely on similar-tier sensors. The absence of details suggests neither phone is a standout performer in photography, focusing instead on core functionality. We can assume both will offer basic computational photography features, but image quality will likely be heavily dependent on lighting conditions.
Performance
The Motorola Moto G 5G’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G (8nm) holds a clear architectural advantage over the Oppo A53 5G’s MediaTek Dimensity 720 (7nm). The Snapdragon 750G utilizes 2x 2.2 GHz Kryo 570 cores alongside 6x 1.8 GHz Kryo 570 cores, while the Dimensity 720 features 2x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. The Kryo 570 architecture generally offers better single-core and multi-core performance, and the 8nm process node contributes to improved thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during extended gaming sessions. This means the Moto G 5G is likely to maintain higher frame rates for longer periods.
Battery Life
Both the Oppo A53 5G and Motorola Moto G 5G achieve an endurance rating of 131 hours, suggesting comparable battery life under similar usage patterns. However, the Motorola Moto G 5G’s 20W wired charging significantly outperforms the Oppo A53 5G’s 10W charging. This translates to a much faster 0-100% charge time for the Motorola, minimizing downtime. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging speed is a tangible benefit for users who prioritize convenience.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A53 5G if you specifically want a device powered by a MediaTek Dimensity 720 chipset and are less concerned with rapid charging. This phone suits users who prioritize a different software experience or have existing familiarity with the MediaTek ecosystem. Buy the Motorola Moto G 5G if you value faster charging speeds, a potentially more efficient processor in the Snapdragon 750G, and a display with measured brightness and contrast ratios, making it ideal for multimedia consumption.