Reliving the mid-2010s smartphone battle! The Oppo A53 (2015) offered a budget-friendly option, while the vivo X7 Plus aimed for a premium experience. Let's dive into a head-to-head comparison to see which phone holds up better today.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The vivo X7 Plus clearly wins this comparison. Its Snapdragon 652 chipset, faster CPU cores, and 18W fast charging provide a significantly smoother and more modern experience than the Oppo A53's Snapdragon 616. While the A53 was a decent budget phone in its time, the X7 Plus offers a superior overall package.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | GSM 900 / 1800 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE |
| | TD-SCDMA | TD-SCDMA |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2015, November. Released 2015, December | 2016, June. Released 2016, July |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 153 x 77 x 7.4 mm (6.02 x 3.03 x 0.29 in) | 158.9 x 78 x 7.5 mm (6.26 x 3.07 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Micro-SIM | Nano-SIM + Micro-SIM |
| Weight | 165 g (5.82 oz) | 183.5 g (6.49 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass | - |
| Resolution | 720 x 1280 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~267 ppi density) | 1080 x 1920 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~386 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.5 inches, 83.4 cm2 (~70.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.7 inches, 89.6 cm2 (~72.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.0 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A72 & 4x1.4 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm MSM8939v2 Snapdragon 616 (28 nm) | Qualcomm MSM8976 Snapdragon 652 (28 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 405 | Adreno 510 |
| OS | Android 5.1 (Lollipop), ColorOS 2.1 | Android 5.1 (Lollipop), Funtouch 2.5 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 16GB 2GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM |
| | eMMC 4.5 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 13 MP, AF | 16 MP, f/2.0, PDAF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | LED flash |
| Single | 5 MP | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | | - |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| | - | 32-bit/192kHz audio
|
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.0, A2DP | 4.0, A2DP |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | microUSB 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, hotspot |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (front-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 18W wired |
| Stand-by | Up to 216 h | - |
| Talk time | Up to 17 h (2G) / Up to 12 h (3G) | - |
| Type | Li-Ion 3075 mAh, non-removable | Li-Ion 4000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | White/Gold | Gold, Rose Gold |
| Price | About 200 EUR | About 680 EUR |
Oppo A53 (2015)
- Affordable (when new)
- Decent battery life
- Compact size
- Outdated chipset
- Slow performance
- Low-resolution display
- No fast charging
vivo X7 Plus
- Faster performance
- Better display (AMOLED)
- Excellent front camera
- Fast charging (18W)
- Sleek design (for its time)
- Older device
- May be difficult to find in good condition
- Limited software updates
Display Comparison
The vivo X7 Plus boasts a larger 5.7-inch Super AMOLED display (likely with vibrant colors and good contrast) compared to the Oppo A53's 5.5-inch IPS LCD. While both offer HD resolution, the AMOLED panel on the X7 Plus provides a noticeably better viewing experience. The X7 Plus also likely had better screen protection (e.g., Gorilla Glass).
Camera Comparison
The vivo X7 Plus was known for its excellent front-facing camera, a key selling point at the time. While both phones have rear cameras (likely around 13MP for both), the X7 Plus's front camera (likely 8MP or higher) was significantly better for selfies. Image processing and low-light performance were also likely superior on the X7 Plus.
Performance
Here's where the vivo X7 Plus shines. The Snapdragon 652 with its Cortex-A72 cores offers a substantial performance boost over the A53's Snapdragon 616 and Cortex-A53 cores. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading, and better gaming performance on the X7 Plus. The X7 Plus's Adreno 510 GPU also outperforms the A53's Adreno 506.
Battery Life
Both phones likely have around 2900-3000 mAh batteries. However, the vivo X7 Plus's 18W fast charging gives it a significant advantage, allowing for quicker top-ups compared to the A53's standard charging.
Buying Guide
The Oppo A53 (2015) might appeal to someone looking for a very basic, ultra-budget device for simple tasks, but finding one in good condition will be challenging. The vivo X7 Plus is suitable for users who want a slightly older but still capable phone with a good camera and faster charging, assuming they can find a reliable source.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Are spare parts readily available for these phones?
Finding spare parts for both phones will be challenging due to their age. It's best to purchase from a reputable seller with a return policy.
❓ Which phone has better software support?
Neither phone receives active software updates. Expect to be running the original Android version they shipped with.
