The Oppo A52 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G represent compelling options in the crowded budget smartphone market. While both aim to deliver a solid experience without breaking the bank, they take distinctly different approaches to achieving this. The A52 relies on the established Snapdragon 665, while the Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G leaps forward with the newer, 5G-enabled Snapdragon 750G. This comparison will dissect the key differences to determine which device offers the best value for your money.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 750G chipset provides a noticeable performance boost over the Oppo A52’s Snapdragon 665, and the significantly faster 33W charging is a game-changer. While the A52 remains a capable device, the Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G offers a more future-proof and convenient experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - Version 1 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 41, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| | 1, 3, 5, 8, 34, 38, 40, 41 - China | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, April 20. Released 2020, April 20 | 2020, November 26 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2020, December 01 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Dimensions | 162 x 75.5 x 8.9 mm (6.38 x 2.97 x 0.35 in) | 165.4 x 76.8 x 9 mm (6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 215 g (7.58 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~83.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~84.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 480 nits (typ) | IPS LCD, HDR10, 120Hz, 450 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 570) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6125 Snapdragon 665 (11 nm) | Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 10, ColorOS 7.1 | Android 10, MIUI 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 12 MP, f/1.7, (wide), 1/2.8", 1.25µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 108 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm - Global
or
8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) - China only | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 33W wired, 100% in 58 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4820 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Twilight Black, Stream White | Gray, Blue, Red/Mint |
| Models | CPH2061, CPH2069, PADM00, PDAM10 | M2007J17C |
| Price | About 240 EUR | About 370 EUR |
Oppo A52
- Potentially more affordable price point.
- Slightly more compact design (assumed based on market positioning).
- Reliable Snapdragon 665 performance for basic tasks.
- Significantly slower charging speed.
- Less powerful Snapdragon 665 chipset.
- Lacks 5G connectivity.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G
- Faster Snapdragon 750G chipset for improved performance.
- Significantly faster 33W charging.
- 5G connectivity for future-proofed data speeds.
- Potentially slightly higher price.
- May be slightly larger and heavier.
- More powerful chipset may consume more battery during intensive use.
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a particularly standout display. While specific panel details (like peak brightness or color gamut coverage) are unavailable, the focus here is on the underlying processing power impacting UI smoothness. The Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G’s more powerful chipset will contribute to a more responsive user experience when navigating the interface and apps, even if the panel technology itself is similar.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is limited. However, the chipset’s image signal processor (ISP) plays a crucial role in image quality. The Snapdragon 750G’s ISP is more advanced than the 665’s, enabling faster image processing, better noise reduction, and improved dynamic range. This translates to better photos and videos, especially in challenging lighting conditions. The Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G is likely to offer a more refined camera experience overall.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G’s Snapdragon 750G (8nm) is a substantial upgrade over the Oppo A52’s Snapdragon 665 (11nm). The 8nm process node inherently offers better power efficiency and thermal characteristics, meaning the 750G can sustain higher performance for longer periods without throttling. The CPU configuration – 2x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 vs 4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver – further emphasizes this advantage, particularly in multi-threaded tasks and gaming. Users who frequently engage in demanding applications or mobile gaming will see a clear benefit from the Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G.
Battery Life
While battery capacity isn't specified, the charging speeds are a major differentiator. The Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G’s 33W wired charging, capable of a full charge in 58 minutes, is significantly faster than the Oppo A52’s 18W charging. This convenience is substantial, reducing downtime and making it easier to top up the battery throughout the day. Even if the A52 has a slightly larger battery, the Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G’s faster charging mitigates any potential endurance disadvantage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A52 if you prioritize a slightly more compact form factor and are on an extremely tight budget, accepting a performance compromise. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G if you value faster performance for gaming and multitasking, and appreciate the convenience of significantly quicker charging speeds – especially if 5G connectivity is a priority.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 750G in the Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G handle demanding games like PUBG or Call of Duty Mobile smoothly?
Yes, the Snapdragon 750G is capable of running PUBG and Call of Duty Mobile at medium to high settings with stable frame rates. Its Adreno 619 GPU provides a significant performance uplift compared to the Snapdragon 665’s Adreno 406, resulting in a smoother and more enjoyable gaming experience.
❓ How much faster is the 33W charging on the Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G compared to the 18W charging on the Oppo A52 in real-world use?
The 33W charging on the Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G can fully charge the device in approximately 58 minutes, while the Oppo A52’s 18W charging will take considerably longer – likely exceeding 2 hours. This difference is particularly noticeable when you need a quick top-up before leaving the house.
❓ Does the Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G actually benefit from 5G connectivity if my carrier doesn't have widespread 5G coverage yet?
Even with limited 5G coverage, the Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G benefits from the modem's improved efficiency and network switching capabilities. It will seamlessly switch between 5G and 4G networks as coverage becomes available, and the modem itself is more advanced, potentially offering better 4G performance in some areas.
