The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC and Oppo A52 represent compelling options in the crowded budget smartphone market. While both aim to deliver value, they take distinctly different approaches. The Poco X3 NFC prioritizes performance and fast charging, targeting mobile gamers and power users, while the Oppo A52 focuses on a balanced experience with a more conservative chipset and charging speed.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 732G chipset offers a substantial performance uplift over the Oppo A52’s Snapdragon 665, and the 33W fast charging is a game-changer. However, the Oppo A52 remains a viable option for those prioritizing simplicity and a lower price point.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - Version 1 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | 1, 3, 5, 8, 34, 38, 40, 41 - China | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, April 20. Released 2020, April 20 | 2020, September 07 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2020, September 08 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 162 x 75.5 x 8.9 mm (6.38 x 2.97 x 0.35 in) | 165.3 x 76.8 x 9.4 mm (6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 215 g (7.58 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~83.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~84.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 480 nits (typ) | IPS LCD, 120Hz, HDR10, 450 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 470 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 470 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6125 Snapdragon 665 (11 nm) | Qualcomm SM7150-AC Snapdragon 732G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 618 |
| OS | Android 10, ColorOS 7.1 | Android 10, upgradable to Android 12, MIUI 14 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1
|
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 12 MP, f/1.7, (wide), 1/2.8", 1.25µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF
13 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1.0µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps, 720p@960fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm - Global
or
8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) - China only | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 33W wired, 62% in 30 min, 100% in 65 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5160 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Twilight Black, Stream White | Cobalt Blue, Shadow Gray |
| Models | CPH2061, CPH2069, PADM00, PDAM10 | M2007J20CG, M2007J20CT |
| Price | About 240 EUR | About 100 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.77 W/kg (head) 0.61 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.56 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
| Pricing |
|---|
| 128GB 6GB RAM | - | € 259.00 |
| 128GB 8GB RAM | - | Rp 2,800,000 |
| 64GB 6GB RAM | - | € 229.00 |
| RENEWED | - | £ 119.00 |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 125h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1299:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-25.3 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 283750 (v8)
GeekBench: 1777 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo A52
- Potentially lower price point
- Simple and streamlined user experience
- Reliable for basic tasks
- Significantly weaker performance
- Slow 18W charging
- Limited RAM options
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
- Powerful Snapdragon 732G chipset
- 33W fast charging
- Available with up to 8GB of RAM
- Potentially higher price
- More complex software experience (MIUI)
- May require more frequent charging due to higher performance
Display Comparison
Both devices share a nominal contrast ratio of 1299:1, suggesting similar visual pop. However, detailed display specs like peak brightness and panel type are missing for the Oppo A52. The Poco X3 NFC’s display, while not explicitly detailed beyond the contrast ratio, benefits from the more powerful GPU driving it, potentially enabling smoother animations and better HDR content playback. Without further data on the Oppo A52’s panel, it’s difficult to assess its color accuracy or viewing angles relative to the Poco X3 NFC.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having photo/video capabilities, but specific details are lacking. Without sensor size, aperture, or image processing details, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the Poco X3 NFC’s more powerful ISP (Image Signal Processor) within the Snapdragon 732G likely translates to better image quality, especially in low-light conditions. The Oppo A52’s camera system is likely geared towards casual snapshots, while the Poco X3 NFC offers more potential for creative photography.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco X3 NFC’s Snapdragon 732G, built on an 8nm process, is a significant upgrade over the Oppo A52’s Snapdragon 665 (11nm). The 732G’s Kryo 470 Gold cores, clocked at 2.3 GHz, provide a noticeable performance boost in CPU-intensive tasks compared to the A52’s 2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold cores. The GPU within the 732G also delivers substantially better graphics performance, making the Poco X3 NFC far more capable for gaming. The Poco X3 NFC’s availability with 6GB or 8GB of RAM further enhances multitasking capabilities, while the Oppo A52 is limited to 6GB.
Battery Life
The Poco X3 NFC boasts a significant advantage in charging speed with its 33W wired charging, capable of reaching 62% in 30 minutes and 100% in 65 minutes. The Oppo A52’s 18W charging is considerably slower. Both phones have an endurance rating of 125 hours, suggesting similar overall battery life *despite* the charging speed difference. This implies the Poco X3 NFC’s more power-hungry chipset is offset by a larger battery capacity (though the exact mAh is not specified) or more efficient power management.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A52 if you need a reliable, no-frills smartphone for basic communication, social media, and light web browsing, and prioritize a lower initial cost. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC if you enjoy mobile gaming, frequently consume media, and value fast charging and a more responsive user experience. The X3 NFC is also the better choice for users who plan to keep their phone for several years.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Poco X3 NFC’s Snapdragon 732G get hot during extended gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 732G is known for its efficient thermal management. While it will get warm during prolonged gaming, it’s less prone to significant throttling compared to older or less efficient chipsets. The Poco X3 NFC also incorporates thermal materials to help dissipate heat.
❓ Is the 64GB storage option on the Poco X3 NFC sufficient, or should I opt for the 128GB version?
64GB is becoming increasingly restrictive, especially if you plan to install many apps, record videos, or download offline content. We strongly recommend the 128GB version, as it provides significantly more storage space and future-proofs your device. The Poco X3 NFC also supports microSD card expansion, but this is often slower than internal storage.
❓ How does the software experience differ between the Oppo A52’s ColorOS and the Poco X3 NFC’s MIUI?
MIUI (Poco X3 NFC) is known for its extensive customization options and feature set, but can also be more resource-intensive and include pre-installed bloatware. ColorOS (Oppo A52) generally offers a cleaner, more streamlined experience, but with fewer customization options. Preference is subjective, but MIUI requires more user intervention to optimize.
