The Oppo A52 and Realme 7 Pro represent distinct approaches to the mid-range smartphone market. The A52 prioritizes affordability with a Snapdragon 665, while the 7 Pro aims for a more premium experience with a Snapdragon 720G and blazing-fast 65W charging. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you choose the right device.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Realme 7 Pro is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 720G chipset provides a noticeable performance boost over the A52’s Snapdragon 665, and the 65W charging is a game-changer. While the A52 is cheaper, the 7 Pro’s added speed and future-proofing justify the price difference.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - Version 1 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | 1, 3, 5, 8, 34, 38, 40, 41 - China | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 - Asia |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, April 20. Released 2020, April 20 | 2020, September 03. Released 2020, September 14 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3+), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 162 x 75.5 x 8.9 mm (6.38 x 2.97 x 0.35 in) | 160.9 x 74.3 x 8.7 mm (6.33 x 2.93 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 182 g (6.42 oz) |
| | - | Water-repellent coating |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3+ |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~83.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~82.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 480 nits (typ) | Super AMOLED |
| | - | Always-on display |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 465 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6125 Snapdragon 665 (11 nm) | Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 618 |
| OS | Android 10, ColorOS 7.1 | Android 10, upgradable to Android 12, Realme UI 3.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 12 MP, f/1.7, (wide), 1/2.8", 1.25µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.3, 119˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm - Global
or
8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) - China only | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, NavIC |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 65W wired, 50% in 12 min, 100% in 34 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Twilight Black, Stream White | Mirror Blue, Mirror Silver |
| Models | CPH2061, CPH2069, PADM00, PDAM10 | RMX2170 |
| Price | About 240 EUR | About 190 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.73 W/kg (head) 0.52 W/kg (body) |
| Pricing |
|---|
| 128GB 8GB RAM | - | Rp 3,498,000 |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 113h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-24.8 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 278414(v8)
GeekBench: 1811 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 14fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo A52
- More affordable price point
- Functional for basic smartphone tasks
- Decent battery endurance (113h)
- Significantly slower processor (Snapdragon 665)
- Slower charging speed (18W)
- Likely inferior camera performance
Realme 7 Pro
- Faster processor (Snapdragon 720G)
- Ultra-fast 65W charging
- Brighter display (585 nits)
- Higher price compared to the Oppo A52
- May be overkill for basic users
- No expandable storage confirmed
Display Comparison
The Realme 7 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 585 nits, compared to the Oppo A52’s unspecified brightness. This higher peak brightness translates to better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While both displays have an 'infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, the brighter panel on the 7 Pro offers a more vibrant and enjoyable viewing experience. Details regarding panel technology (IPS, AMOLED) and refresh rate are missing for the A52, suggesting a more basic display experience.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature photo and video capabilities, but specifics are limited. Without sensor size or aperture details for either device, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the Snapdragon 720G in the Realme 7 Pro includes a more advanced Image Signal Processor (ISP), enabling superior image processing and potentially better low-light performance. The A52’s older chipset will likely result in less detailed and dynamic range in photos and videos. The absence of details suggests neither phone is a camera powerhouse, but the 7 Pro has a clear advantage due to its superior processing power.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Realme 7 Pro’s Snapdragon 720G (8nm) is a substantial upgrade over the Oppo A52’s Snapdragon 665 (11nm). The 720G features Kryo 465 Gold cores clocked at 2.3 GHz, alongside six Kryo 465 Silver cores at 1.8 GHz, offering a significant CPU performance advantage over the A52’s 2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold and 1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver configuration. The 8nm process node of the 720G also contributes to better thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of performance throttling during extended gaming sessions. The A52 will handle everyday tasks, but the 7 Pro is demonstrably faster and more capable.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 113 hours, suggesting similar overall battery life under typical usage. However, the Realme 7 Pro’s 65W wired charging is a massive advantage. It can charge from 0% to 50% in just 12 minutes and reach 100% in 34 minutes. The Oppo A52’s 18W charging is significantly slower, requiring considerably more time to fully recharge. This difference in charging speed dramatically impacts the user experience, making the 7 Pro far more convenient for users who need to quickly top up their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A52 if you need a functional smartphone for basic tasks like calling, texting, and light social media use, and your budget is extremely limited. Buy the Realme 7 Pro if you prioritize performance for gaming and multitasking, demand fast charging, and want a device that will remain responsive for years to come. The 7 Pro is ideal for users who value speed and convenience.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 720G in the Realme 7 Pro handle demanding games like PUBG or Call of Duty?
Yes, the Snapdragon 720G is capable of running PUBG and Call of Duty at medium to high settings with stable frame rates. While it's not a flagship-level gaming chip, it provides a significantly smoother gaming experience than the Snapdragon 665 in the Oppo A52, and its 8nm process helps mitigate thermal throttling during extended gaming sessions.
❓ How much faster is the 65W charging on the Realme 7 Pro compared to the 18W charging on the Oppo A52 in real-world use?
The difference is substantial. The Realme 7 Pro can reach 100% charge in approximately 34 minutes, while the Oppo A52 will likely take well over 2 hours. This means you can quickly top up the 7 Pro during a short break, whereas the A52 requires overnight charging for a full battery.
❓ Does the Realme 7 Pro support VoLTE and VoWiFi for improved call quality?
While not explicitly stated in the provided data, Realme 7 Pro typically supports VoLTE (Voice over LTE) and VoWiFi (Voice over Wi-Fi) depending on carrier compatibility. This ensures better call quality and connectivity, especially in areas with weak cellular signals. The Oppo A52's support for these features would depend on regional variations and carrier support.
