OnePlus Nord 5 vs Oppo A52: A Comprehensive Performance and Value Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the OnePlus Nord 5 is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 chipset delivers significantly faster performance, complemented by a brighter display and blazing-fast 80W charging. However, the Oppo A52 remains a viable option for those prioritizing extreme budget-friendliness.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo A52 | OnePlus Nord 5 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - Version 1 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 3, 5, 8, 34, 38, 40, 41 - China | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, April 20. Released 2020, April 20 | 2025, July 08 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2025, July 08 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 7i), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 162 x 75.5 x 8.9 mm (6.38 x 2.97 x 0.35 in) | 163.4 x 77 x 8.1 mm (6.43 x 3.03 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 211 g (7.44 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i, Mohs level 6 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) | 1272 x 2800 pixels (~450 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~83.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.83 inches, 113.3 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 480 nits (typ) | Swift AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, 3840Hz PWM, HDR10+, 800 nits (typ), 1400 nits (HBM), 1800 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6125 Snapdragon 665 (11 nm) | Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 735 |
| OS | Android 10, ColorOS 7.1 | Android 15, up to 4 major Android upgrades, OxygenOS 15 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 116˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm, AF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, Ultra HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 12 MP, f/1.7, (wide), 1/2.8", 1.25µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | Panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm - Global or 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) - China only | 50 MP, f/2.0, 21mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 5 |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 80W wired, 33W PPS, 18W PD, 100% in just 54 min 5W reverse wired Bypass charging |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Market-dependent versions:· 5200 mAh (Europe)· 6800 mAh (Global) |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Twilight Black, Stream White | Phantom Grey, Dry Ice, Marble Sands |
| Models | CPH2061, CPH2069, PADM00, PDAM10 | CPH2709 |
| Price | About 240 EUR | £ 339.00 / € 294.97 / ₹ 31,998 |
| SAR | - | 1.18 W/kg (head) 0.90 W/kg (body) |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | - | 49:12h endurance, 1200 cycles |
| Energy | - | Class B |
| Free fall | - | Class C (90 falls) |
| Repairability | - | Class B |
Oppo A52
- Extremely affordable price point
- Functional for basic smartphone tasks
- Decent battery life for light usage
- Outdated Snapdragon 665 chipset
- Slow 18W charging
- Likely inferior display quality
OnePlus Nord 5
- Powerful Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 chipset
- Ultra-fast 80W charging
- Bright and vibrant display (1330 nits)
- Long battery life and 1200 charge cycles
- Higher price compared to the Oppo A52
- May be overkill for basic users
- Potentially larger footprint
Display Comparison
The OnePlus Nord 5 boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak brightness of 1330 nits, compared to the Oppo A52’s unspecified brightness. This difference translates to vastly improved visibility in direct sunlight. While the A52’s panel technology isn’t specified, the Nord 5’s superior brightness suggests a more advanced panel, potentially with higher contrast. Bezels are likely slimmer on the Nord 5, reflecting its more modern design. Color accuracy is also likely superior on the Nord 5, given OnePlus’s focus on display quality.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for the Oppo A52, a direct comparison is limited. However, the OnePlus Nord 5 is expected to feature a more advanced camera system, leveraging the image signal processor (ISP) within the Snapdragon 8s Gen 3. The ISP enables faster image processing, improved low-light performance, and potentially more sophisticated features like computational photography. While the A52 may suffice for casual snapshots, the Nord 5 is better equipped for serious photography and videography. We can assume the Nord 5 will have a larger main sensor and optical image stabilization (OIS), features likely absent on the A52.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Oppo A52 utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (11nm), while the OnePlus Nord 5 features the Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4nm). This is a generational leap. The 8s Gen 3’s 4nm process offers superior power efficiency and thermal performance, preventing throttling during sustained workloads. The CPU architecture is also dramatically different; the Nord 5’s Cortex-X4 prime core at 3.0 GHz provides a substantial performance boost over the A52’s Kryo 260 Gold cores peaking at 2.0 GHz. The Nord 5’s LPDDR5x RAM (assumed, based on chipset) further enhances responsiveness compared to the A52’s likely LPDDR4X configuration.
Battery Life
The OnePlus Nord 5’s battery endurance is a standout feature, offering 49:12 hours of total usage and 13:47 hours of active use. This is significantly better than what the Oppo A52 can achieve. Crucially, the Nord 5’s 80W wired charging allows for a full charge in just 54 minutes, a massive advantage over the A52’s 18W charging. The Nord 5 also supports 33W PPS and 18W PD, offering versatile charging options, and even includes 5W reverse wired charging. The Nord 5’s 1200 charge cycles suggest a longer battery lifespan.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A52 if you need a functional smartphone for basic tasks like calling, texting, and light social media use, and your budget is extremely limited. Buy the OnePlus Nord 5 if you prioritize smooth multitasking, demanding gaming, a vibrant display, and rapid charging, and are willing to spend more for a significantly enhanced experience.