Oppo A52 vs. Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025): A Deep Dive into Budget 5G
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing speed and future-proofing, the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 chipset and blazing-fast 68W charging significantly outperform the Oppo A52's older hardware, despite the A52's potentially longer software support lifespan.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo A52 | Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - Version 1 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 12, 14, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 70, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 3, 5, 8, 34, 38, 40, 41 - China | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, April 20. Released 2020, April 20 | 2025, April 08 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2025, April 17 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), silicone polymer (eco leather) back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 162 x 75.5 x 8.9 mm (6.38 x 2.97 x 0.35 in) | 162.2 x 74.8 x 8.3 mm (6.39 x 2.94 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 191 g (6.74 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~444 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~83.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 480 nits (typ) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR, 3000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6125 Snapdragon 665 (11 nm) | Qualcomm SM6475-AB Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 710 |
| OS | Android 10, ColorOS 7.1 | Android 15, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 12 MP, f/1.7, (wide), 1/2.8", 1.25µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm - Global or 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) - China only | 32 MP, f/2.2, 25mm (wide), 1/3.14", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers (with Dolby Atmos) |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 68W wired 15W wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Twilight Black, Stream White | Pantone: Gibraltar sea, Surf the Web |
| Models | CPH2061, CPH2069, PADM00, PDAM10 | XT2517-1 |
| Price | About 240 EUR | $ 299.99 / C$ 368.17 |
Oppo A52
- Potentially longer software support due to established release date.
- Proven reliability and a track record of consistent performance.
- More affordable price point (likely).
- Outdated Snapdragon 665 chipset limits performance.
- Slower charging speeds (18W wired).
- Likely lower display brightness and color accuracy.
Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025)
- Significantly faster Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 chipset.
- Ultra-fast 68W wired and 15W wireless charging.
- Much brighter display (1870 nits).
- Longer battery life in active use (10:05h).
- May have a shorter software support lifespan.
- Potentially higher price point.
- Newer device, so long-term reliability is unproven.
Display Comparison
The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1870 nits, compared to the Oppo A52’s unspecified brightness. This higher peak brightness translates to vastly improved visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While the Oppo A52’s panel technology isn’t specified, the Motorola’s brightness advantage is substantial. The Motorola’s display is likely to offer a more vibrant and engaging viewing experience, especially for multimedia consumption. We expect the Motorola to have a higher contrast ratio as well.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for the Oppo A52, a direct comparison is limited. However, given its market segment, it likely features a standard camera setup. The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) is expected to have a more advanced camera system, potentially with a larger main sensor and improved image processing capabilities. While megapixel count isn't everything, a larger sensor generally captures more light, resulting in better low-light performance. The Motorola’s image processing algorithms, benefiting from the more powerful chipset, will likely deliver sharper images and more accurate colors.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo A52 utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (11nm), an older generation processor with a focus on efficiency. The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) steps up to the Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (4nm). This represents a major architectural shift; the 4nm process node delivers significantly improved power efficiency and transistor density, resulting in higher performance and reduced thermal throttling. The Motorola’s CPU, with its Cortex-A78 cores, offers a substantial performance uplift over the A52’s Kryo 260 cores, particularly in demanding tasks. The Motorola will handle multitasking and graphically intensive games with greater ease.
Battery Life
The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) achieves an impressive 10:05h of active use, demonstrating excellent battery life despite its more powerful processor. While the Oppo A52’s battery capacity isn’t specified, the Motorola’s charging capabilities are a game-changer. The 68W wired charging allows for incredibly fast top-ups, significantly reducing downtime. The addition of 15W wireless charging on the Motorola provides further convenience, a feature absent on the Oppo A52, which is limited to 18W wired charging.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A52 if you need a reliable, long-lasting device with a proven track record and are comfortable with a more modest processor. It's ideal for basic tasks like calling, texting, and light social media. Buy the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) if you prioritize performance for gaming, multitasking, and demanding apps, and value the convenience of incredibly fast charging and a brighter display.