Oppo A5 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range 5G Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing battery life and rapid charging, the Oppo A5 emerges as the winner. Its exceptional 85:05h endurance and 45W charging, including PPS and PD support, significantly outperform the Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G. However, gamers and those seeking potentially smoother performance may lean towards the Redmi.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo A5 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - version 1 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA - version 1 | 1, 3, 41, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, May 15 | 2020, November 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, May 15 | Available. Released 2020, December 01 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Dimensions | 165.7 x 76.2 x 8 mm (6.52 x 3.00 x 0.31 in) | 165.4 x 76.8 x 9 mm (6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 194 g (6.84 oz) | 215 g (7.58 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i, Mohs level 4 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1604 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~264 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.2 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~84.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 1000 nits (HBM) | IPS LCD, HDR10, 120Hz, 450 nits (typ) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 570) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 10, MIUI 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 2 MP, f/2.4, (wide) | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 108 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps (6/8GB RAM models only) | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes, (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | Unspecified | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, 33W PPS, 13.5W PD, 50% in 37 min | 33W wired, 100% in 58 min |
| Type | 6000 mAh | Li-Po 4820 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Aurora Green, Mist White | Gray, Blue, Red/Mint |
| Models | CPH2735, PKW120 | M2007J17C |
| Price | $ 231.00 / £ 99.00 / € 99.99 / ₹ 15,498 | About 370 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 85:05h endurance, 1600 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Oppo A5
- Exceptional battery life (85:05h endurance)
- Ultra-fast 45W charging with PPS and PD
- More efficient 6nm Dimensity 6300 chipset
- Camera specifications unknown, potential for average image quality
- Potentially less GPU power compared to the Redmi
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G
- Snapdragon 750G offers decent gaming performance
- Qualcomm ISP potentially delivers vibrant photos
- Established brand reputation
- Slower 33W charging
- Less efficient 8nm Snapdragon 750G chipset
- Likely shorter battery life compared to the Oppo A5
Display Comparison
Display specifications are absent from the provided data, but considering the market segment, both likely feature LCD panels with 120Hz refresh rates. The key difference will likely be peak brightness and color accuracy. Oppo historically focuses on color science, potentially giving it an edge in display quality. Without specific data, it's difficult to definitively declare a winner, but we anticipate similar viewing experiences.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are missing, but given the price point, both phones likely feature a multi-camera setup with a primary sensor around 48-64MP. The Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G’s Snapdragon ISP is known for its strong image processing capabilities, potentially resulting in more vibrant and detailed photos. However, the Oppo A5’s Dimensity 6300 also includes a capable ISP. Without sensor size and aperture information, it’s impossible to determine a clear winner. We expect both to perform adequately in good lighting conditions, with the Redmi potentially having a slight advantage in low-light scenarios.
Performance
The core of the difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo A5’s Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6nm) boasts a more modern architecture than the Xiaomi’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G (8nm). While the Snapdragon 750G’s Kryo 570 cores clock slightly higher (2.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz on the A76 cores), the Dimensity 6300’s 6nm process node offers superior power efficiency. This translates to better thermal management and sustained performance under load. The Dimensity 6300’s Cortex-A76 cores also provide a performance uplift over the Kryo 570s in single-core tasks. This benefits responsiveness and app launch times. The Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G may have a slight edge in GPU performance, but the Dimensity 6300’s overall efficiency is a significant advantage.
Battery Life
The Oppo A5 dominates in battery performance. Its 85:05h endurance is significantly higher than what we’d expect from the Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G, which lacks a specified endurance rating. Furthermore, the A5’s 45W charging, with support for both PPS and PD, is a substantial upgrade over the Redmi’s 33W charging. The A5 can reach 50% charge in just 37 minutes, while the Redmi takes 58 minutes to fully charge. This faster charging speed, combined with the longer battery life, makes the Oppo A5 the clear winner for users who prioritize these features.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A5 if you need exceptional battery life, incredibly fast charging, and a phone that can reliably last through a full day (and then some) of heavy use. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G if you prioritize a potentially smoother gaming experience and are willing to trade some battery endurance for a different chipset architecture.