Oppo A5 vs Realme 6 Pro: Which Mid-Range Champion Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing fast charging and potentially longer battery lifespan, the Oppo A5 is the better choice. Its 45W charging significantly outperforms the Realme 6 Pro’s 30W, and the Dimensity 6300’s 6nm process offers efficiency gains. However, the Realme 6 Pro’s display is slightly brighter.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo A5 | Realme 6 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - Global |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - version 1 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - Global |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA - version 1 | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/11.5 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat6 300/150 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 - India | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, May 15 | 2020, March 05. Released 2020, March 13 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, May 15 | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 165.7 x 76.2 x 8 mm (6.52 x 3.00 x 0.31 in) | 163.8 x 75.8 x 8.9 mm (6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 194 g (6.84 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i, Mohs level 4 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1604 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~264 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~399 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.2 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 105.2 cm2 (~84.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 1000 nits (HBM) | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits (typ) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 465 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 618 |
| OS | Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 10, upgradable to Android 11, Realme UI 2.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 2 MP, f/2.4, (wide) | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF 12 MP, f/2.5, 54mm (telephoto), 1/3.4", 1.0µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.3, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps (6/8GB RAM models only) | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 16 MP, f/2.1, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm 8 MP, f/2.2, 105˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Features | Panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes, (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, NavIC |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, 33W PPS, 13.5W PD, 50% in 37 min | 30W wired, 100% in 57 min |
| Type | 6000 mAh | 4300 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Aurora Green, Mist White | Lightning Blue, Lightning Orange, Lightning Red |
| Models | CPH2735, PKW120 | RMX2061, RMX2063 |
| Price | $ 231.00 / £ 99.00 / € 99.99 / ₹ 15,498 | About 540 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.19 W/kg (head) 0.92 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 107h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: 1324:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -28.5 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 268785 (v8) GeekBench: 7027 (v4.4), 1666 (v5.1) GFXBench: 19fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 85:05h endurance, 1600 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Oppo A5
- Significantly faster 45W charging
- More efficient 6nm Dimensity 6300 chipset
- Longer battery lifespan (1600 cycles)
- Display specifications are unknown
- Camera details are lacking
Realme 6 Pro
- Slightly brighter display (421 nits)
- Established Realme UI software experience
- Good battery endurance (107h rating)
- Slower 30W charging
- Less efficient 8nm Snapdragon 720G chipset
Display Comparison
The Realme 6 Pro boasts a measured peak brightness of 421 nits and a 1324:1 contrast ratio. While respectable, the Oppo A5’s display specifications are not provided, making a direct brightness comparison difficult. However, given the A5’s newer chipset and potential for panel advancements, it’s likely competitive. Both share the same contrast ratio, suggesting similar viewing experiences in terms of black levels. The lack of high refresh rate panels on either device positions them firmly in the mainstream segment, prioritizing battery life over ultra-smooth scrolling.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, offering minimal insight. Without specific sensor details (megapixel count, sensor size, aperture), a meaningful comparison is impossible. The absence of any mention of advanced features like OIS suggests both rely on software processing for image stabilization. It’s reasonable to assume both phones will perform adequately in good lighting conditions, but low-light performance will likely be a differentiating factor dependent on sensor size and image processing algorithms – data currently unavailable.
Performance
The core of the difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo A5’s Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6nm) utilizes a more modern fabrication process than the Realme 6 Pro’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (8nm). This 6nm process generally translates to improved power efficiency and potentially lower thermal throttling under sustained loads. While the Snapdragon 720G’s CPU clock speeds (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 465 Silver) are slightly higher on paper than the A5’s (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55), the architectural advantages of the Dimensity 6300 and its process node likely provide a more consistent performance profile, especially in demanding tasks. The A5’s GPU performance is not specified, but the Dimensity 6300 is known for capable graphics.
Battery Life
The Realme 6 Pro claims an endurance rating of 107 hours, while the Oppo A5 boasts an impressive 85:05h endurance. This seemingly favors the Realme 6 Pro, but the A5’s charging capabilities are a game-changer. The A5 supports 45W wired charging, 33W PPS, and 13.5W PD, reaching 50% charge in just 37 minutes. In contrast, the Realme 6 Pro’s 30W charging takes 57 minutes to reach 100%. The A5’s 1600 cycle battery lifespan also suggests a longer overall battery health compared to the Realme 6 Pro. The A5’s efficiency gains from the 6nm Dimensity chip likely contribute to its endurance despite the lower initial rating.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A5 if you need consistently fast charging, prioritize long-term battery health with its 1600 cycle rating, and value a modern, efficient chipset. Buy the Realme 6 Pro if you prefer a slightly brighter display and are willing to trade charging speed for a potentially more established software ecosystem within the Realme UI.