Oppo A5 vs Nokia 7.2: A Detailed Comparison of Performance, Battery, and Display
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Oppo A5 emerges as the stronger contender. Its Mediatek Dimensity 6300 chipset offers significantly improved performance and future-proofing compared to the aging Snapdragon 660 in the Nokia 7.2. The A5’s 45W charging is a game-changer, offsetting its slightly lower battery endurance rating.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo A5 | Nokia 7.2 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 - ROW |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - version 1 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - ROW |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA - version 1 | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat6 300/50 Mbps or LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 - IN | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, May 15 | 2019, September 05. Released 2019, September 23 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, May 15 | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), glass back (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 165.7 x 76.2 x 8 mm (6.52 x 3.00 x 0.31 in) | 159.9 x 75.2 x 8.3 mm (6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 194 g (6.84 oz) | 180 g (6.35 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i, Mohs level 4 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1604 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~264 ppi density) | 1080 x 2280 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.2 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.3 inches, 99.1 cm2 (~82.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 1000 nits (HBM) | IPS LCD, HDR10 |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SDM660 Snapdragon 660 (14 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 512 |
| OS | Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 11, Android One |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| - | eMMC 5.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 2 MP, f/2.4, (wide) | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Zeiss optics, LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps (6/8GB RAM models only) | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS) |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | Zeiss optics, HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 20 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3", 0.9µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, EDR, LE, aptX |
| NFC | Yes, (market/region dependent) | Yes (excl. India) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, 33W PPS, 13.5W PD, 50% in 37 min | 10W wired |
| Type | 6000 mAh | Li-Po 3500 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Aurora Green, Mist White | Cyan Green, Charcoal, Ice |
| Models | CPH2735, PKW120 | TA-1193, TA-1178, TA-1196, TA-1181 |
| Price | $ 231.00 / £ 99.00 / € 99.99 / ₹ 15,498 | About 240 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.15 W/kg (head) 0.90 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.44 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Audio quality | - | Noise -93.0dB / Crosstalk -93.4dB |
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 69h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: 1342:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -29.6 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 139495 (v7), 164484 (v8) GeekBench: 5440 (v4.4), 1398 (v5.1) GFXBench: 8.1fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 85:05h endurance, 1600 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Oppo A5
- Significantly faster processor for smoother performance
- Ultra-fast 45W charging dramatically reduces charging time
- Longer battery endurance rating (85:05h)
- Display specifications are unknown, potentially lower quality than Nokia 7.2
- Camera details are limited, making it hard to assess image quality
Nokia 7.2
- Excellent display with high brightness (585 nits) and contrast (1342:1)
- Classic and refined design aesthetic
- Potentially good image processing quality
- Outdated Snapdragon 660 chipset limits performance
- Extremely slow 10W charging
- Lower battery endurance rating (69h)
Display Comparison
The Nokia 7.2 boasts a noticeably superior display experience, achieving a measured peak brightness of 585 nits and a 1342:1 contrast ratio. While the Oppo A5’s display specifications are not provided, the Nokia 7.2’s panel offers richer colors and better visibility in direct sunlight. The contrast ratio indicates deeper blacks and a more immersive viewing experience, crucial for video playback and gaming. The Nokia 7.2’s display is a clear advantage for media consumers.
Camera Comparison
Both devices feature photo and video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are limited for both. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the Nokia 7.2’s brand reputation suggests a focus on image processing quality, potentially delivering more natural-looking photos. The Oppo A5’s newer chipset *could* offer more advanced image processing algorithms, but this is speculative without further data. The absence of details makes it hard to determine a clear winner; the camera experience will likely depend more on software optimization than raw hardware.
Performance
The performance gap between these two devices is substantial. The Oppo A5’s Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6nm) utilizes a more modern architecture – Cortex-A76 and A55 cores – compared to the Nokia 7.2’s Snapdragon 660 (14nm). The 6nm process node of the Dimensity 6300 translates to improved power efficiency and reduced thermal throttling under sustained loads. The A5’s CPU configuration (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) provides a significant uplift in both single-core and multi-core performance over the Snapdragon 660’s (4x2.2 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver). This difference will be most noticeable in demanding applications and games.
Battery Life
The Oppo A5 offers 85:05h of endurance, while the Nokia 7.2 provides 69h. While the A5’s battery capacity isn’t specified, its endurance rating suggests efficient power management despite the more powerful chipset. Crucially, the A5 supports 45W wired charging, 33W PPS, and 13.5W PD, allowing a 50% charge in just 37 minutes. The Nokia 7.2 is limited to a slow 10W charging rate. This charging speed disparity is a major advantage for the A5, minimizing downtime and offering a more convenient user experience. The A5’s faster charging effectively mitigates any concerns about slightly lower overall endurance.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A5 if you prioritize performance for gaming, multitasking, and future app compatibility, and if fast charging is a must-have feature. Buy the Nokia 7.2 if you value a well-tuned display with excellent contrast and brightness, and prefer a more classic smartphone aesthetic. The Nokia 7.2 is best suited for users who primarily use their phone for communication, media consumption, and light tasks.