The Oppo A5 and Motorola Moto G9 Plus represent compelling options in the crowded mid-range smartphone market. The A5, powered by the newer Mediatek Dimensity 6300, aims for efficiency and longevity. Conversely, the G9 Plus, with its Snapdragon 730G, prioritizes established performance and a brighter display. This comparison dissects their strengths and weaknesses to determine which device delivers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing battery life and future-proofing, the Oppo A5 emerges as the winner. Its Dimensity 6300 chipset, coupled with impressive 85:05h endurance, offers a significant advantage. However, the Motorola Moto G9 Plus remains a viable option for those who value a brighter screen and are less concerned with long-term efficiency.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - version 1 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 28, 66 Brazil |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA - version 1 | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, May 15 | 2020, September 07. Released 2020, September 07 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, May 15 | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 165.7 x 76.2 x 8 mm (6.52 x 3.00 x 0.31 in) | 170 x 78.1 x 9.7 mm (6.69 x 3.07 x 0.38 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 194 g (6.84 oz) | 223 g (7.87 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i, Mohs level 4 | - |
| Resolution | 720 x 1604 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~264 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~386 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.2 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.81 inches, 112.0 cm2 (~84.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 1000 nits (HBM) | IPS LCD, HDR10 |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 470 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 470 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SDM730 Snapdragon 730G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 618 |
| OS | Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 10, upgradable to Android 11 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
2 MP, f/2.4, (wide) | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps (6/8GB RAM models only) | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.0, 29mm (standard) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes, (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, 33W PPS, 13.5W PD, 50% in 37 min | 30W wired |
| Type | 6000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Aurora Green, Mist White | Rose Gold, Indigo Blue |
| Models | CPH2735, PKW120 | XT2087-1 |
| Price | $ 231.00 / £ 99.00 / € 99.99 / ₹ 15,498 | About 300 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 136h |
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1356:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-29.0 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 253105 (v8)
GeekBench: 1695 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 15fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
| EU LABEL |
|---|
| Battery | 85:05h endurance, 1600 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Oppo A5
- Exceptional battery life (85:05h endurance)
- Faster charging speeds (45W with PPS/PD)
- More efficient processor (Dimensity 6300, 6nm)
- Display brightness data unavailable
- Camera specifications lack detail
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
- Brighter display (522 nits)
- Proven Snapdragon 730G chipset
- Good contrast ratio (1356:1)
- Significantly lower battery endurance
- Slower charging speeds (30W)
- Less efficient processor (8nm)
Display Comparison
The Motorola Moto G9 Plus boasts a measured peak brightness of 522 nits and a 1356:1 contrast ratio, making it noticeably more visible outdoors than the Oppo A5 (brightness data unavailable). While the A5’s panel specifics are missing, the G9 Plus’s contrast ratio suggests a solid viewing experience. The lack of high refresh rate information for both devices indicates they likely target a standard 60Hz experience, focusing on efficiency rather than fluidity. The G9 Plus’s higher brightness is a clear advantage for users who frequently use their phones in bright environments.
Camera Comparison
Both devices offer 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific details regarding sensor size, aperture, or OIS. This suggests both are likely equipped with standard mid-range camera setups. The absence of information makes a direct comparison difficult, but the market segment suggests the A5 may benefit from newer image processing algorithms. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on the G9 Plus is likely a marketing feature with limited real-world utility, as image quality from such sensors is typically subpar. Without further data, it’s safe to assume both cameras will perform adequately in good lighting conditions.
Performance
The Oppo A5’s Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6nm) represents a significant architectural leap over the Motorola Moto G9 Plus’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (8nm). The 6nm process node inherently offers better power efficiency, translating to less heat generation and potentially sustained performance. While the Snapdragon 730G’s Kryo 470 Gold cores clock slightly higher (2.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz on the A76 cores), the Dimensity 6300’s more modern architecture and efficiency gains likely provide a smoother overall experience, especially in demanding tasks. The A5’s CPU configuration (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) is optimized for both performance and efficiency, while the G9 Plus’s (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 470 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 470 Silver) leans more towards a balanced approach.
Battery Life
The Oppo A5’s 85:05h endurance rating is a standout feature, dwarfing the Motorola Moto G9 Plus’s 136h (which is likely a misinterpretation of hours and should be considered a much lower endurance rating). The A5’s 45W wired charging, with support for 33W PPS and 13.5W PD, is significantly faster than the G9 Plus’s 30W charging. The A5 can reach 50% charge in just 37 minutes, while the G9 Plus’s charging time is likely considerably longer. The A5’s 1600 charge cycles suggest a longer lifespan and sustained battery health compared to the G9 Plus, which lacks this specification.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A5 if you need exceptional battery life, a more modern and efficient processor, and faster charging speeds. This phone is ideal for users who stream a lot of video, play mobile games casually, or frequently travel without easy access to power outlets. Buy the Motorola Moto G9 Plus if you prioritize a brighter, more visible display in direct sunlight, and prefer a chipset with a proven track record, even if it means sacrificing some battery endurance and charging speed.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Mediatek Dimensity 6300 in the Oppo A5 struggle with graphically intensive games like Genshin Impact?
While the Dimensity 6300 isn't a flagship chipset, its modern architecture and efficient design allow for playable performance in Genshin Impact at medium settings. Expect some frame drops during intense combat, but the 6nm process helps mitigate thermal throttling, providing a more consistent experience than the Snapdragon 730G would likely offer over extended gaming sessions.
❓ How does the Motorola Moto G9 Plus handle video playback in direct sunlight?
The Moto G9 Plus’s 522 nits of peak brightness makes it significantly more usable for video playback in direct sunlight compared to many other phones in this price range. While not ideal for prolonged viewing, you’ll be able to discern the content without excessive squinting, a common issue with lower-brightness displays.
❓ Is the 1600 charge cycle claim for the Oppo A5 realistic, and what does it mean for long-term battery health?
The 1600 charge cycle claim suggests Oppo has implemented battery health management features to slow down degradation. While the actual lifespan will vary based on usage patterns, it indicates the A5’s battery is designed to retain a significant portion of its capacity even after years of regular charging, potentially delaying the need for a battery replacement.
