The Oppo A5 and Infinix Note 8i represent compelling options in the crowded budget smartphone market. The A5 leverages Mediatek's newer Dimensity 6300 chipset, promising a leap in efficiency and performance, while the Note 8i relies on the established Helio G80. This comparison dives deep into the specifics to determine which device offers the best overall experience for the price.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and future-proofing, the Oppo A5 emerges as the winner. Its Dimensity 6300 chipset, built on a 6nm process, offers a significant advantage in both CPU and GPU capabilities, coupled with superior battery endurance. However, the Infinix Note 8i remains a viable option for casual users focused on basic tasks.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - version 1 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA - version 1 | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28 |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, May 15 | 2020, October 15. Released 2020, November 15 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, May 15 | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 165.7 x 76.2 x 8 mm (6.52 x 3.00 x 0.31 in) | 171.4 x 77.7 x 8.9 mm (6.75 x 3.06 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 194 g (6.84 oz) | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i, Mohs level 4 | Corning Gorilla Glass |
| Resolution | 720 x 1604 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~264 ppi density) | 720 x 1640 pixels (~264 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.2 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~82.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 1000 nits (HBM) | IPS LCD, 480 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6 nm) | Mediatek MT6769V/CU Helio G80 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| OS | Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 10, XOS 7.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
2 MP, f/2.4, (wide) | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 48 MP, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lenses |
| Video | 1080p@30fps (6/8GB RAM models only) | 1440p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | Dual-LED flash |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 8 MP |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes, (market/region dependent) | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, 33W PPS, 13.5W PD, 50% in 37 min | 18W wired |
| Type | 6000 mAh | 5200 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Aurora Green, Mist White | Gray, Blue, Green |
| Models | CPH2735, PKW120 | X683, X683B |
| Price | $ 231.00 / £ 99.00 / € 99.99 / ₹ 15,498 | About 150 EUR |
| EU LABEL |
|---|
| Battery | 85:05h endurance, 1600 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Oppo A5
- Superior performance with Dimensity 6300 chipset
- Faster charging speeds (45W)
- Excellent battery endurance (85:05h)
- Potentially higher price point
- Display details unknown - may not be class-leading
Infinix Note 8i
- More affordable price
- Potentially higher refresh rate display
- Adequate performance for basic tasks
- Slower charging (18W)
- Less powerful chipset (Helio G80)
- Inferior CPU and GPU performance
Display Comparison
Display specifications are not provided in the context data. However, given the price points, both devices likely feature LCD panels with 1080p resolution. The A5, being a newer release, *may* benefit from a slightly higher peak brightness and improved color accuracy. The Note 8i, typical of Infinix, might prioritize a higher refresh rate (90Hz is common) to enhance perceived smoothness, even with a less advanced panel.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are absent, but we can infer. Both phones likely feature a multi-camera setup with a primary sensor. The A5, given its newer chipset, likely benefits from improved image signal processing (ISP) capabilities, resulting in better dynamic range and low-light performance. The Note 8i may rely more heavily on software processing to compensate for a potentially less capable sensor. The presence of a 2MP macro lens on either device is largely a marketing gimmick and should not be a deciding factor.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo A5’s Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6nm) boasts a more modern architecture with its Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.4 GHz, compared to the Infinix Note 8i’s Helio G80 (12nm) and its 2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 cores. The 6nm process of the Dimensity 6300 translates to significantly improved power efficiency and thermal management, allowing for sustained peak performance. While both are octa-core CPUs, the A5’s CPU is demonstrably faster. The GPU within the Dimensity 6300 also offers a substantial performance uplift, making it better suited for gaming. The Note 8i’s Helio G80 is adequate for casual gaming, but will likely struggle with more demanding titles at higher settings.
Battery Life
The Oppo A5 boasts an impressive 85:05h endurance and 1600 charge cycles, indicating excellent battery life and longevity. Its charging capabilities are also superior, supporting 45W wired charging, 33W PPS, and 13.5W PD, achieving a 50% charge in just 37 minutes. The Infinix Note 8i’s 18W charging is considerably slower, requiring significantly more time to fully replenish the battery. While the Note 8i’s battery capacity isn’t specified, the A5’s combination of efficient chipset and fast charging provides a clear advantage for users who demand all-day battery life and quick top-ups.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A5 if you need a phone capable of handling demanding apps, moderate gaming, and appreciate longer battery life with faster charging. It's ideal for users who want a device that will remain responsive for years to come. Buy the Infinix Note 8i if you prioritize affordability and are primarily focused on everyday tasks like calling, texting, and social media. It's a good choice for first-time smartphone buyers or those on a very tight budget.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Helio G80 in the Infinix Note 8i struggle with graphically intensive games like Genshin Impact?
Yes, the Helio G80 is likely to struggle with Genshin Impact and similar demanding titles. You'll likely need to reduce graphics settings significantly to achieve playable frame rates, and even then, expect some stuttering. The Oppo A5’s Dimensity 6300 offers a much smoother gaming experience.
❓ How much faster is the 45W charging on the Oppo A5 compared to the 18W charging on the Infinix Note 8i in real-world use?
The 45W charging on the Oppo A5 is substantially faster. While the Note 8i will take well over two hours to fully charge, the A5 can reach 50% charge in just 37 minutes and a full charge in approximately 60-75 minutes. This difference is particularly noticeable for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly.
❓ Does the Mediatek Dimensity 6300 in the Oppo A5 generate more heat during prolonged gaming sessions compared to the Helio G80?
Despite being more powerful, the Dimensity 6300's 6nm process is more efficient, meaning it generates less heat than the Helio G80's 12nm process. This translates to less thermal throttling and more sustained performance during extended gaming sessions.
