The mid-range 5G smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Oppo A5 Pro and Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) represent compelling options. While both aim to deliver a premium experience without the flagship price tag, they take different approaches to achieving this. The Oppo prioritizes long-term battery health and efficient processing, while the Xiaomi focuses on rapid charging and a slightly different chipset architecture.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing longevity and consistent performance, the Oppo A5 Pro emerges as the winner. Its Dimensity 6300 chipset and impressive 62:10h battery endurance offer a more balanced experience. However, users who value incredibly fast charging and are willing to trade some battery cycle life will find the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G appealing.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - Global | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - Global | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Global | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE-A (CA), 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, February 25 | 2022, March 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, March 10 | Available. Released 2022, March 15 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back |
| Dimensions | 164.8 x 75.5 x 7.8 mm (6.49 x 2.97 x 0.31 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Hybrid Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) |
| Weight | 194 g (6.84 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i or Schott Xensation Alpha, Mohs level 4 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1604 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~264 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.2 cm2 (~86.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 1160Hz PWM, 1000 nits (HBM) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 11, MIUI 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP, f/2.4, (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | - |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, 45W PD, 50% in 35 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 50% in 15 min, 100% in 42 min (advertised) |
| Type | 5800 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Flower Pink, Mocha Brown (Chocolate Mocha), Feather Blue | Mirage Blue, Phantom White, Stealth Black |
| Models | CPH2695 | 2201116SI |
| Price | $ 245.11 / £ 139.00 / € 129.99 / ₹ 16,739 | About 250 EUR |
| EU LABEL |
|---|
| Battery | 62:10h endurance, 1600 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Oppo A5 Pro
- Exceptional battery life (62:10h endurance)
- Long-lasting battery health (1600 cycles)
- Efficient Dimensity 6300 chipset for sustained performance
- Slower charging speed compared to the Redmi Note 11 Pro+
- Camera specifications unknown, potential disadvantage
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India)
- Ultra-fast 67W charging (50% in 15 min)
- Snapdragon 695 5G offers solid 5G connectivity
- Potentially higher resolution main camera (based on historical models)
- Shorter battery lifespan (fewer cycles)
- Potentially less efficient CPU architecture for sustained tasks
Display Comparison
Display specifications are not provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the price bracket, both likely feature AMOLED panels. The Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G historically features a 120Hz refresh rate, which the A5 Pro may or may not match. The key difference will likely be in peak brightness and color calibration, with Xiaomi often pushing for vibrant, saturated colors, while Oppo tends towards more natural tones. Bezels are expected to be minimal on both devices, reflecting current design trends.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are absent, but both phones likely feature multi-camera systems. The Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G is known for its 108MP main sensor, which is a significant advantage if present. The Oppo A5 Pro’s camera performance will depend on its sensor size and image processing algorithms. Without specific details, it’s difficult to assess the quality of low-light photography or video recording. The inclusion of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) on either device would be a crucial factor for sharper images and smoother videos.
Performance
The core of the performance difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo A5 Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6nm) utilizes a dual-core Cortex-A76 setup alongside six Cortex-A55 cores, peaking at 2.4 GHz. This architecture prioritizes efficiency and sustained performance. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) employs the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm) with a Kryo 660 Gold/Silver configuration, topping out at 2.2 GHz. While the Snapdragon 695 offers respectable performance, the Dimensity 6300’s Cortex-A76 cores generally provide a slight edge in CPU-intensive tasks. The 6nm process node is shared, suggesting similar thermal efficiency, but the Oppo’s CPU architecture may lead to less throttling under prolonged load.
Battery Life
The Oppo A5 Pro boasts a remarkable 62:10h endurance rating, indicating exceptional battery life. This is further bolstered by its advertised 1600 battery cycles, suggesting significantly longer lifespan compared to typical smartphones. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) compensates for potentially lower endurance with its 67W wired charging, achieving 50% charge in just 15 minutes and a full charge in 42 minutes (advertised). The Oppo A5 Pro’s 45W charging with PD support is still fast, reaching 50% in 35 minutes, but lags behind the Xiaomi in sheer speed. The trade-off is clear: the Xiaomi prioritizes quick top-ups, while the Oppo focuses on maximizing overall battery health and longevity.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A5 Pro if you need a phone that will reliably last through the day, and for years to come, thanks to its 1600 battery cycles. It’s ideal for users who stream video, browse the web, and engage in moderate gaming. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) if you prioritize getting back to 100% charge as quickly as possible – its 67W charging is a significant advantage – and don't mind potentially replacing the battery sooner.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Dimensity 6300 in the Oppo A5 Pro struggle with demanding games like Genshin Impact?
While the Dimensity 6300 isn't a flagship chipset, it's capable of running Genshin Impact at medium settings with reasonable frame rates. The efficient architecture helps prevent overheating and throttling during extended gaming sessions, providing a more consistent experience than some competing chipsets in this price range.
❓ How much faster is the 67W charging on the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G compared to the 45W charging on the Oppo A5 Pro in real-world use?
The 67W charging on the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G will noticeably reduce charging time. While the Oppo A5 Pro's 45W is still fast, the Xiaomi will gain approximately 25-30% charge in the time it takes the Oppo to reach 50%. This difference is most impactful for users who frequently need to quickly top up their battery.
❓ Is the 1600 battery cycle claim for the Oppo A5 Pro realistic, and what does it mean for the average user?
1600 battery cycles is a significant improvement over the typical 500-800 cycles found in most smartphones. This means the Oppo A5 Pro’s battery will retain a higher percentage of its original capacity after two to three years of regular use, delaying the need for a battery replacement. For the average user, this translates to a longer-lasting phone and reduced long-term costs.
