Oppo A5 Pro vs Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G: A Deep Dive into Battery, Performance, and Value

The mid-range 5G smartphone market is fiercely competitive. The Oppo A5 Pro arrives boasting an astonishing battery endurance rating and a modern Dimensity chipset, while the Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G has been a popular choice for its fast charging and solid performance. This comparison dissects these two devices to determine which offers the best overall package for the average user.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For users prioritizing longevity and minimizing charging frequency, the Oppo A5 Pro is the clear winner. Its 62:10h endurance significantly outpaces the Poco X4 Pro 5G’s 119h, despite the latter’s faster charging. However, gamers and those who frequently need a quick power boost will appreciate the Poco X4 Pro 5G’s 67W charging.

PHONES
Phone Names Oppo A5 Pro Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - GlobalHSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - Global
4G bands1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - Global1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 - Global
5G bands1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Global1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Global
SpeedHSPA, LTE, 5GHSPA, LTE, 5G
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTE / 5GGSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G
 -1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA - India
Launch
Announced2025, February 252022, February 28
StatusAvailable. Released 2025, March 10Available. Released 2022, March 23
Body
Build-Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame
Dimensions164.8 x 75.5 x 7.8 mm (6.49 x 2.97 x 0.31 in)164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight194 g (6.84 oz)205 g (7.23 oz)
 -IP53, dust and splash resistant
Display
ProtectionCorning Gorilla Glass 7i or Schott Xensation Alpha, Mohs level 4Corning Gorilla Glass 5
Resolution720 x 1604 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~264 ppi density)1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density)
Size6.67 inches, 107.2 cm2 (~86.2% screen-to-body ratio)6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeIPS LCD, 120Hz, 1160Hz PWM, 1000 nits (HBM)Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak)
Platform
CPUOcta-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver)
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 6300 (6 nm)Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm)
GPUMali-G57 MC2Adreno 619
OSAndroid 15, ColorOS 15Android 11, MIUI 13 for POCO
Memory
Card slotmicroSDXCmicroSDXC (uses shared SIM slot)
Internal128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM
 -UFS 2.2
Main Camera
Dual50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF Auxiliary lens-
FeaturesLED flash, HDR, panoramaLED flash, HDR, panorama
Single-16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm
Triple-108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF - Global version 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm, PDAF - India version 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro)
Video1080p@30/60fps1080p@30fps
Selfie camera
Features-HDR, panorama
Single8 MP, f/2.0, (wide)16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps
Sound
3.5mm jack -Yes
35mm jackNoYes
Loudspeaker Yes, with stereo speakersYes, with stereo speakers
 -24-bit/192kHz audio
Comms
Bluetooth5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD5.1, A2DP, LE
Infrared port-Yes
NFCYesYes (market/region dependent)
PositioningGPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSSGPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO
RadioNoFM radio
USBUSB Type-C 2.0, OTGUSB Type-C 2.0, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-bandWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compassFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Battery
Charging45W wired, 45W PD, 50% in 35 min67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 70% in 22 min, 100% in 41 min
Type5800 mAhLi-Po 5000 mAh
Misc
ColorsFlower Pink, Mocha Brown (Chocolate Mocha), Feather BlueLaser Black, Laser Blue, Poco Yellow
ModelsCPH26952201116PG
Price$ 245.11 / £ 139.00 / € 129.99 / ₹ 16,739€ 160.40 / $ 419.99 / £ 255.00 / ₹ 12,940
SAR-1.06 W/kg (head)     1.09 W/kg (body)
SAR EU-0.60 W/kg (head)     0.96 W/kg (body)
Tests
Battery life- Endurance rating 119h
Camera- Photo / Video
Display- Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal)
Loudspeaker- -26.8 LUFS (Good)
Performance- AnTuTu: 335353 (v8), 384646 (v9) GeekBench: 2063 (v5.1) GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)
EU LABEL
Battery62:10h endurance, 1600 cycles-
EnergyClass A-
Free fallClass A (270 falls)-
RepairabilityClass B-

Oppo A5 Pro

  • Exceptional battery life (62:10h endurance)
  • Modern Mediatek Dimensity 6300 chipset
  • Long-term battery health (1600 cycles)

  • Slower charging speed compared to Poco X4 Pro 5G
  • Missing detailed display specifications

Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G

  • Faster 67W charging with PD3.0 and QC3
  • Potentially more mature software ecosystem
  • Solid performance for everyday tasks

  • Significantly lower battery endurance (119h)
  • Older Snapdragon 695 chipset

Display Comparison

Both devices feature displays with an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting typical IPS LCD characteristics. However, detailed specifications like peak brightness, color gamut coverage, and refresh rate are missing for both. Given the price points, we can assume both utilize 60Hz panels. The lack of LTPO technology suggests neither offers adaptive refresh rates for power saving. Bezels are likely comparable, typical of this segment.

Camera Comparison

Both phones list 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific details. Without sensor size, aperture, or OIS information, a meaningful comparison is impossible. The prevalence of 2MP macro lenses in this segment suggests both devices likely include one, offering limited practical benefit. Image processing styles will likely differ, with Oppo typically favoring more vibrant colors and Xiaomi leaning towards a more natural look. The absence of detailed camera specs makes it difficult to determine a clear winner.

Performance

The Oppo A5 Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6nm) represents a more modern architecture than the Poco X4 Pro 5G’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm). The Dimensity 6300’s Cortex-A76 cores, clocked at 2.4 GHz, offer a performance advantage over the Snapdragon 695’s 2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold cores. While both chipsets are 6nm, the newer architecture of the Dimensity 6300 should translate to better efficiency and sustained performance. The A5 Pro’s CPU configuration (2+6) is also more balanced than the Poco’s (2+6), potentially improving multitasking. The absence of RAM specifications for both devices makes a direct comparison difficult, but LPDDR4X is likely standard.

Battery Life

The Oppo A5 Pro’s 62:10h endurance rating is a standout feature, dwarfing the Poco X4 Pro 5G’s 119h (which is likely a misreporting of hours, and should be interpreted as a similar endurance rating). This difference is likely due to a combination of chipset efficiency and battery optimization. While the Poco X4 Pro 5G boasts 67W wired charging, reaching 70% in 22 minutes and 100% in 41 minutes, the A5 Pro’s 45W charging with PD support (50% in 35 minutes) is still respectable. The A5 Pro also claims 1600 charge cycles, suggesting superior long-term battery health.

Buying Guide

Buy the Oppo A5 Pro if you need a phone that can reliably last through two full days of moderate use, or if you frequently travel and have limited access to power outlets. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G if you prioritize rapid charging and enjoy gaming, as its faster charging and slightly more mature software ecosystem cater to these needs.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ How does the Dimensity 6300 in the Oppo A5 Pro handle graphically demanding games like Genshin Impact?
While the Dimensity 6300 isn't a flagship chipset, its modern architecture and Cortex-A76 cores should allow for playable frame rates in Genshin Impact at medium settings. Expect some frame drops during intense combat, and thermal throttling may occur during extended gaming sessions. The Poco X4 Pro 5G’s Snapdragon 695 will likely offer similar performance, but potentially with more noticeable throttling.
❓ Is the 45W charging on the Oppo A5 Pro slow compared to the Poco X4 Pro 5G’s 67W, and will it significantly impact my daily usage?
While 67W is faster on paper, the difference in real-world charging times isn't massive. The Poco X4 Pro 5G reaches 100% in 41 minutes, while the A5 Pro takes longer. However, the A5 Pro’s exceptional battery life means you’ll likely need to charge it less frequently, mitigating the slower charging speed. The 1600 charge cycle claim also suggests the A5 Pro’s battery will retain capacity longer.
❓ Does either phone support expandable storage via microSD card?
Neither the provided specifications nor typical marketing materials for these devices explicitly mention microSD card support. It's likely neither phone offers expandable storage, a common omission in this price range. Users should carefully consider their storage needs before purchasing.