Oppo A5 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy A53 5G: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Champions
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing longevity and consistent performance, the Oppo A5 Pro emerges as the winner. Its significantly superior battery endurance – boasting 62:10h versus the A53’s 113h (which is a much older measurement standard) – and more efficient Dimensity 6300 chipset offer a more reliable long-term experience. However, the A53 5G’s brighter display remains a strong point for media consumption.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo A5 Pro | Samsung Galaxy A53 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - Global | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - Global | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 12, 14, 20, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66 - SM-A536U |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Global | 2, 5, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - SM-A536U |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 2, 5, 48, 66, 77, 78, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - SM-A536V | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, February 25 | 2022, March 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, March 10 | Available. Released 2022, March 24 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.8 x 75.5 x 7.8 mm (6.49 x 2.97 x 0.31 in) | 159.6 x 74.8 x 8.1 mm (6.28 x 2.94 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 194 g (6.84 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i or Schott Xensation Alpha, Mohs level 4 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1604 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~264 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.2 cm2 (~86.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~85.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 1160Hz PWM, 1000 nits (HBM) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6 nm) | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G68 |
| OS | Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 12, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 8 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7X", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer (market/region dependent) |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, 45W PD, 50% in 35 min | 25W wired |
| Type | 5800 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Flower Pink, Mocha Brown (Chocolate Mocha), Feather Blue | Black, White, Blue, Peach |
| Models | CPH2695 | SM-A536B, SM-A536B/DS, SM-A536U, SM-A536U1, SM-A5360, SM-A536E, SM-A536E/DS, SM-A536V, SM-A536W, SM-A536N, SM-S536DL |
| Price | $ 245.11 / £ 139.00 / € 129.99 / ₹ 16,739 | $ 151.42 / £ 185.00 / € 169.14 |
| SAR | - | 0.75 W/kg (head) 1.58 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.89 W/kg (head) 1.60 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 113h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.5 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 329802 (v8), 379313 (v9) GeekBench: 1891 (v5.1) GFXBench: 19fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 62:10h endurance, 1600 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Oppo A5 Pro
- Exceptional battery life (62:10h endurance)
- Modern and efficient Dimensity 6300 chipset
- Fast 45W charging with PD support
- Display brightness not specified, potentially lower than A53
- Camera specifications lack detail
Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
- Bright 830 nit display for excellent outdoor visibility
- Established Samsung image processing algorithms
- Potentially better camera performance in certain scenarios
- Significantly shorter battery life compared to A5 Pro
- Older Exynos 1280 chipset may throttle under load
- Slower 25W charging
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G boasts a notably brighter display, peaking at 830 nits, which provides excellent visibility in direct sunlight. The Oppo A5 Pro’s display brightness is not specified, but given its focus on battery life, it likely prioritizes efficiency over peak luminance. The A53 5G’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio (nominal) suggests a typical AMOLED panel, offering deep blacks and vibrant colors. While the A5 Pro’s panel technology isn’t detailed, the A53’s established display quality is a clear advantage for users who frequently consume media outdoors or in brightly lit environments.
Camera Comparison
Both devices feature photo and video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are limited. The absence of sensor size information makes a direct comparison difficult. However, focusing on practical usage, the A53 5G likely benefits from Samsung’s well-regarded image processing algorithms. The inclusion of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on the A53 5G, if present, would provide a significant advantage in low-light photography and video recording. The 2MP macro cameras on both devices are likely to offer limited practical benefit due to their small sensor size and low resolution.
Performance
The Oppo A5 Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6nm) chipset represents a generational leap over the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G’s Exynos 1280 (5nm). While both utilize an octa-core configuration with 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76/A78 cores and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, the Dimensity 6300’s newer architecture and 6nm process node offer improved power efficiency and potentially better sustained performance. This translates to smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and potentially better gaming performance for the A5 Pro. The A53’s Exynos 1280, while capable, may exhibit more thermal throttling under sustained load.
Battery Life
The Oppo A5 Pro’s battery endurance of 62:10h is a standout feature, dwarfing the Galaxy A53 5G’s 113h (measured using a different, older testing methodology). This difference is further amplified by the A5 Pro’s 45W wired charging with 45W PD support, allowing for a 50% charge in just 35 minutes. The A53 5G’s 25W charging is significantly slower. The A5 Pro’s combination of a highly efficient chipset and fast charging provides a superior user experience for those who prioritize battery life and minimal downtime.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A5 Pro if you need a phone that can reliably last through two full days of moderate use, and value a modern chipset for smoother multitasking and app performance. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G if you prioritize a brighter, more vibrant display for outdoor visibility and media consumption, and are comfortable with potentially shorter battery life and an older generation processor.