Oppo A5 Pro vs. Infinix Note 12 Pro 5G: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range 5G Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing long-lasting battery life and faster charging, the Oppo A5 Pro is the clear winner. Its impressive 62-hour endurance and 45W charging significantly outperform the Infinix Note 12 Pro 5G, despite both phones sharing a similar CPU architecture.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo A5 Pro | Infinix Note 12 Pro 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - Global | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - Global | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Global | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, February 25 | 2022, July 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, March 10 | Available. Released 2022, July 15 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.8 x 75.5 x 7.8 mm (6.49 x 2.97 x 0.31 in) | 164.7 x 76.9 x 8 mm (6.48 x 3.03 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 194 g (6.84 oz) | 188 g (6.63 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i or Schott Xensation Alpha, Mohs level 4 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1604 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~264 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.2 cm2 (~86.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~85.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 1160Hz PWM, 1000 nits (HBM) | AMOLED |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 12, XOS 10.6 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 1440p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | Dual-LED flash |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1440p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with dual speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, 45W PD, 50% in 35 min | 33W wired |
| Type | 5800 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Flower Pink, Mocha Brown (Chocolate Mocha), Feather Blue | Black, White |
| Models | CPH2695 | X671B |
| Price | $ 245.11 / £ 139.00 / € 129.99 / ₹ 16,739 | About 140 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 62:10h endurance, 1600 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Oppo A5 Pro
- Exceptional battery life (62:10h endurance)
- Fast 45W charging with PD support
- Long-term battery health (1600 charge cycles)
- Potentially slightly lower peak performance compared to Dimensity 810
- Camera specifications unknown
Infinix Note 12 Pro 5G
- Slightly more powerful chipset (Dimensity 810)
- 5G connectivity
- Competitive price point
- Slower 33W charging
- Inferior battery endurance compared to Oppo A5 Pro
Display Comparison
Display specifications are absent from the provided data, but considering the market positioning, both devices likely feature 6.5-6.7 inch FHD+ LCD panels. The absence of information regarding refresh rates or panel technology (like AMOLED) suggests a focus on cost-effectiveness. Bezels are likely comparable, and color accuracy will depend on software calibration, a factor not covered in the provided specs.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are unavailable, but given the price bracket, both phones likely feature a multi-camera setup with a primary sensor around 50MP. The absence of information regarding Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) suggests it's unlikely to be present on either device. Image processing will be a key differentiator, with Oppo typically favoring more vibrant and saturated images, while Infinix often aims for a more natural look. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on either device is largely a marketing tactic, offering limited practical benefit due to the small sensor size and lack of detail.
Performance
Both the Oppo A5 Pro and Infinix Note 12 Pro 5G utilize an octa-core CPU configuration with 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. However, the key difference lies in the chipset: the Oppo A5 Pro features the Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6nm), while the Infinix Note 12 Pro 5G uses the Dimensity 810 (6nm). While the core configuration is identical, the Dimensity 810 generally offers a slight performance edge in GPU-intensive tasks due to architectural optimizations. The 6nm fabrication process on both chips ensures reasonable power efficiency, but the Dimensity 6300’s newer architecture may offer marginal improvements. RAM specifications are missing, but LPDDR4X is probable for both.
Battery Life
The Oppo A5 Pro boasts a significant advantage in battery endurance with a reported 62:10h runtime, coupled with an impressive 1600 charge cycles, indicating long-term battery health. This is contrasted by the Infinix Note 12 Pro 5G’s unspecified battery life. Furthermore, the Oppo A5 Pro supports 45W wired charging with 45W PD (Power Delivery), enabling a 50% charge in just 35 minutes. The Infinix Note 12 Pro 5G is limited to 33W wired charging, resulting in a slower charging experience. This difference in charging speed is substantial for users who value convenience.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A5 Pro if you need a phone that can reliably last through two full days of moderate use and benefits from significantly faster charging speeds. This is ideal for travelers, busy professionals, or anyone who dislikes frequent charging. Buy the Infinix Note 12 Pro 5G if you prioritize a slightly more powerful chipset (Dimensity 810) for potentially smoother multitasking and gaming, and are willing to compromise on battery life and charging speed to achieve that.