The Oppo A5 Pro (China) and Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro represent different points in the Android evolution. The Mi 9T Pro, while older, was a flagship contender, while the A5 Pro aims to deliver strong performance in the mid-range with a newer chipset. This comparison dissects their strengths and weaknesses to determine which phone offers the best value in today's market.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Oppo A5 Pro emerges as the better choice. Its Mediatek Dimensity 7300, built on a more efficient 4nm process, provides a performance edge and improved thermal management over the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro’s Snapdragon 855. While the Mi 9T Pro boasts comparable battery endurance, the A5 Pro’s significantly faster 80W charging is a compelling advantage.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, December 24 | 2019, August 21. Released 2019, August 21 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, December 27 | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back (Crystal Shield Glass) | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 161.5 x 74.9 x 7.6 mm (6.36 x 2.95 x 0.30 in) | 156.7 x 74.3 x 8.8 mm (6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 180 g or 186 g (6.35 oz) | 191 g (6.74 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.39 inches, 100.2 cm2 (~86.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 600 nits (typ), 1200 nits (HBM) | Super AMOLED, HDR |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Adreno 640 |
| OS | Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 11, MIUI 12.5 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), 1/2.88", PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.4, 53mm (telephoto), 1/4.0", 1.12µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom
13 MP, f/2.4, 12mm (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/120/240fps, 1080p@960fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide) | Motorized pop-up 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio
|
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a) |
| Radio | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, PD, 45% in 20 min | 27W wired, QC4 |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 6000 mAh | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Red, Purple | Carbon black, Red flame, Glacier blue |
| Models | PKP110 | M1903F11G |
| Price | About 260 EUR | About 150 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.03 W/kg (head) 0.72 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.30 W/kg (head) 1.51 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality | - |
Noise -93.9dB / Crosstalk -94.2dB |
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 103h |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.9 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 368846 (v7), 437823 (v8)
GeekBench: 10684 (v4.4), 2732 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 36fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo A5 Pro (China)
- Faster 80W charging significantly reduces downtime.
- More efficient 4nm Dimensity 7300 chipset.
- Potentially better sustained performance due to improved thermal management.
- Detailed display specifications are unavailable.
- Camera specifications are unknown, making image quality assessment difficult.
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
- Proven track record and mature software experience.
- Comparable battery endurance to the Oppo A5 Pro.
- Potentially lower price point due to its age.
- Older 7nm Snapdragon 855 chipset is less efficient.
- Slower 27W charging.
- Potential for throttling under sustained load.
Display Comparison
Both devices share an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting both utilize AMOLED panels. However, detailed display specs like peak brightness and color gamut coverage are missing for the A5 Pro. The Mi 9T Pro’s display benefits from a well-established calibration profile. The A5 Pro’s potential advantage lies in potentially higher refresh rates, a common feature in newer mid-range phones, though this isn't specified in the provided data. Without further information, it's difficult to definitively declare a display winner.
Camera Comparison
The provided data lacks detailed camera specifications for both devices. Without sensor size, aperture information, or details on image stabilization (OIS), a meaningful camera comparison is impossible. We can assume both phones offer a multi-camera setup typical of their respective price points, but the image quality will heavily depend on the sensor and image processing algorithms. The absence of information prevents us from assessing low-light performance or video recording capabilities.
Performance
The Oppo A5 Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4nm) represents a significant architectural leap over the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro’s Snapdragon 855 (7nm). The Dimensity 7300’s Cortex-A78 cores, clocked at 2.5 GHz, are more efficient and offer improved single-core performance compared to the Snapdragon 855’s Kryo 485 cores. The 4nm fabrication process further enhances efficiency, reducing heat generation and potentially minimizing throttling during prolonged gaming sessions. While the Snapdragon 855 was a flagship chip in its time, the Dimensity 7300 offers a more modern and balanced performance profile.
Battery Life
Both the Oppo A5 Pro and Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro achieve an endurance rating of 103 hours, indicating similar overall battery life. However, the charging capabilities are drastically different. The A5 Pro’s 80W wired charging, with a 45% charge in 20 minutes, is significantly faster than the Mi 9T Pro’s 27W charging with QC4. This means the A5 Pro can quickly top up its battery, minimizing downtime. While the Mi 9T Pro’s endurance is respectable, the A5 Pro’s charging speed provides a tangible convenience advantage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A5 Pro (China) if you prioritize future-proofing, faster charging speeds, and sustained performance during demanding tasks like gaming. Buy the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro if you find a significantly discounted unit and value a proven track record with a mature software experience, and aren't concerned about the older chipset's efficiency.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 855 in the Mi 9T Pro struggle with demanding games like Genshin Impact?
The Snapdragon 855 can run Genshin Impact, but you may experience noticeable frame drops and throttling after extended play sessions due to its 7nm process and thermal limitations. The Dimensity 7300 in the A5 Pro, with its 4nm process, is better equipped to handle sustained gaming loads.
❓ How much faster is the 80W charging on the Oppo A5 Pro compared to the 27W charging on the Mi 9T Pro?
The Oppo A5 Pro can charge to 45% in just 20 minutes, while the Mi 9T Pro’s 27W charging will take considerably longer to reach the same level. This translates to significantly less time tethered to a charger, offering a more convenient user experience.
❓ Is the Dimensity 7300 a significant upgrade over the Snapdragon 855 for everyday tasks like browsing and social media?
For everyday tasks, the difference won't be dramatically noticeable. Both chips are more than capable of handling these workloads smoothly. However, the Dimensity 7300’s efficiency will result in slightly better battery life during typical usage.
