The Oppo A5 Pro (China) and vivo X27 Pro represent different approaches to the mid-range smartphone market. The A5 Pro, leveraging Mediatek’s newer Dimensity 7300, aims for a performance edge, while the X27 Pro, with the Snapdragon 710, focuses on a more established, if less potent, experience. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you determine which device best aligns with your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing performance and future-proofing, the Oppo A5 Pro is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 7300 chipset offers a significant leap in processing power and efficiency over the Snapdragon 710 in the vivo X27 Pro. However, the X27 Pro remains a viable option for those on a tighter budget or who prioritize a more refined software experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - V1836A |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat12 600/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - V1836T |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, December 24 | 2019, April. Released 2019, April |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, December 27 | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back (Crystal Shield Glass) | - |
| Dimensions | 161.5 x 74.9 x 7.6 mm (6.36 x 2.95 x 0.30 in) | 165.7 x 74.6 x 9 mm (6.52 x 2.94 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 180 g or 186 g (6.35 oz) | 200 g (7.05 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 106.6 cm2 (~86.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 600 nits (typ), 1200 nits (HBM) | Super AMOLED |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz 360 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 360 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SDM710 Snapdragon 710 (10 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Adreno 616 |
| OS | Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 9.0 (Pie), Funtouch 9 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), 1/2.88", PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
13 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | LED flash, HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide) | Motorized pop-up 32 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| | - |
32-bit/384kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE, EDR, aptX |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, PD, 45% in 20 min | 18W wired |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 6000 mAh | 4000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Red, Purple | Black, White |
| Models | PKP110 | V1836A, V1836T, V1838T |
| Price | About 260 EUR | About 530 EUR |
Oppo A5 Pro (China)
- Significantly faster charging (80W)
- More powerful processor (Dimensity 7300)
- Improved power efficiency (4nm process)
- Potentially less refined software experience (depending on Oppo's ColorOS)
- Availability limited to China
vivo X27 Pro
- Established brand reputation (vivo)
- Potentially more polished software experience
- Lower price point (likely)
- Slower processor (Snapdragon 710)
- Significantly slower charging (18W)
- Less efficient processor (10nm process)
Display Comparison
While specific display details beyond resolution are unavailable for both devices, the focus here is on the underlying performance that drives the visual experience. The chipset's GPU capabilities will dictate frame rates in games and smoothness of animations. The A5 Pro's Dimensity 7300 will provide a more responsive and fluid experience, even if both phones share a similar panel type. The X27 Pro's older GPU will struggle with graphically intensive tasks.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, it's difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, the chipset plays a role in image processing speed and quality. The Dimensity 7300’s advanced ISP (Image Signal Processor) in the A5 Pro will likely deliver faster image capture, improved noise reduction, and better dynamic range compared to the Snapdragon 710 in the X27 Pro. The A5 Pro will also benefit from more advanced computational photography features. We assume both phones will have a primary camera, but the A5 Pro's processing power will give it an edge.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo A5 Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4nm) is a substantial upgrade over the vivo X27 Pro’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (10nm). The Dimensity 7300’s newer Cortex-A78 cores, clocked at 2.5 GHz, offer significantly higher single-core performance than the Snapdragon 710’s 2.2 GHz Cortex-A75 cores. Furthermore, the 4nm process node of the Dimensity 7300 translates to improved power efficiency and reduced thermal throttling, crucial for sustained performance during gaming or video editing. The Snapdragon 710, while capable, will show its age in demanding scenarios.
Battery Life
The Oppo A5 Pro’s 80W wired charging is a game-changer. Achieving 45% charge in just 20 minutes is significantly faster than the vivo X27 Pro’s 18W charging. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging speed of the A5 Pro mitigates any potential disadvantage from a smaller battery. The X27 Pro’s slower charging will require considerably more time to reach a full charge, impacting convenience for users who frequently need to top up their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A5 Pro (China) if you need a phone capable of handling demanding applications, modern mobile games, and benefit from significantly faster charging speeds. Buy the vivo X27 Pro if you prefer a more established brand with a potentially more polished software experience, and your usage primarily revolves around everyday tasks like social media, calls, and light web browsing, and you aren't concerned with the latest performance.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 710 in the vivo X27 Pro struggle with demanding games like Genshin Impact?
Yes, the Snapdragon 710 is likely to struggle with Genshin Impact and other graphically intensive games. You'll likely need to lower graphics settings significantly to achieve playable frame rates, and even then, expect some stuttering. The Dimensity 7300 in the Oppo A5 Pro will provide a much smoother gaming experience.
❓ How much faster is the 80W charging on the Oppo A5 Pro compared to the 18W charging on the vivo X27 Pro in real-world use?
The difference is substantial. The Oppo A5 Pro can gain 45% charge in 20 minutes, while the vivo X27 Pro will take well over an hour to achieve the same level. This means you can quickly top up the A5 Pro during short breaks, whereas the X27 Pro requires a much longer charging period.
❓ Is the Dimensity 7300 known for overheating under sustained load?
The Dimensity 7300's 4nm process node is designed for improved thermal efficiency. While any chipset can heat up under extreme load, the 7300 is less prone to throttling compared to the Snapdragon 710, allowing for more sustained performance during gaming or video recording.
