The Oppo A5 Pro (China) and Realme X7 Max 5G represent distinct approaches to the mid-range 5G market. The A5 Pro, featuring the newer Dimensity 7300, prioritizes efficiency and modern features, while the X7 Max 5G leverages the older, but still potent, Dimensity 1200. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device delivers the best value and performance.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Oppo A5 Pro emerges as the better choice. Its newer Dimensity 7300 chipset, built on a more efficient 4nm process, offers comparable performance to the X7 Max 5G’s Dimensity 1200 while potentially delivering superior thermal management and battery life. The faster 80W charging further sweetens the deal.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, December 24 | 2021, May 31 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, December 27 | Available. Released 2021, June 04 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back (Crystal Shield Glass) | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 161.5 x 74.9 x 7.6 mm (6.36 x 2.95 x 0.30 in) | 158.5 x 73.3 x 8.4 mm (6.24 x 2.89 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 180 g or 186 g (6.35 oz) | 179 g (6.31 oz) |
| | - | Splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 | Dragontrail Glass |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 600 nits (typ), 1200 nits (HBM) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 1000 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, Realme UI 4 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), 1/2.88", PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.3, 16mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/480fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, PD, 45% in 20 min | 50W wired, 50% in 16 min
2.5W reverse wired |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 6000 mAh | 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Red, Purple | Mercury Silver, Asteroid Black, Milky Way |
| Models | PKP110 | - |
| Price | About 260 EUR | About 310 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 110h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-25.1 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 605819 (v8), 680671 (v9)
GeekBench: 13105 (v4.4), 2614 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 44fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo A5 Pro (China)
- Faster 80W charging
- More efficient 4nm Dimensity 7300 chipset
- Potentially better thermal management
- Display specifications largely unknown
- Camera details unavailable
Realme X7 Max 5G
- Proven Dimensity 1200 performance
- 640 nits peak brightness
- Reverse wired charging
- Slower 50W charging
- Less efficient 6nm Dimensity 1200 chipset
- Potentially more thermal throttling
Display Comparison
The Realme X7 Max 5G boasts a measured peak brightness of 640 nits, a respectable figure for outdoor visibility. However, the Oppo A5 Pro’s display specifications are currently unavailable, making a direct brightness comparison impossible. Given Oppo’s recent display trends, it’s likely to be competitive. Both phones feature an 'infinite' contrast ratio, a marketing term that doesn't provide meaningful differentiation. Without knowing the panel technology (e.g., AMOLED, LCD) or refresh rate of the A5 Pro, it’s difficult to assess its overall display quality beyond brightness.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, offering minimal insight. Without sensor size, aperture, or OIS details, a meaningful camera comparison is impossible. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on the X7 Max 5G is likely a marketing gimmick, offering limited practical benefit. The image processing style and overall image quality will depend heavily on software tuning, which is brand-specific and unavailable for comparison without sample images. The A5 Pro’s camera system remains largely unknown.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Realme X7 Max 5G’s Dimensity 1200 (6nm) features a 1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 core and 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 cores, alongside 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. The Oppo A5 Pro’s Dimensity 7300 (4nm) utilizes 4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. While the 1200 has a higher clocked primary core, the 7300’s 4nm process offers significant gains in power efficiency. This translates to less heat generation under load, potentially reducing throttling during extended gaming sessions. The A5 Pro’s architecture, with four performance cores, suggests strong multi-core performance, potentially matching or exceeding the X7 Max 5G in certain workloads. RAM specifications are missing for both devices, but assuming both utilize LPDDR5, the chipset efficiency will be the primary performance differentiator.
Battery Life
The Realme X7 Max 5G has an endurance rating of 110 hours, suggesting moderate battery life. Its 50W charging can replenish 50% of the battery in 16 minutes. The Oppo A5 Pro, however, boasts 80W wired charging, capable of reaching 45% in just 20 minutes. While the A5 Pro’s battery capacity is unknown, the faster charging speed is a significant advantage. The Dimensity 7300’s 4nm process should also contribute to improved battery efficiency, potentially offsetting any capacity difference.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A5 Pro (China) if you need a phone with a focus on long-term efficiency, faster charging speeds, and a potentially cooler operating temperature during sustained tasks. Buy the Realme X7 Max 5G if you prioritize a proven track record of performance with the Dimensity 1200 and are comfortable with a slightly older chipset and slower charging, potentially finding it at a lower price point.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Dimensity 1200 in the Realme X7 Max 5G overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Dimensity 1200 is a powerful chip, but its 6nm process can lead to thermal throttling during extended gaming. While the X7 Max 5G likely has cooling solutions, it may not be as effective as the Oppo A5 Pro’s potentially cooler-running Dimensity 7300.
❓ How much faster is the 80W charging on the Oppo A5 Pro compared to the 50W charging on the Realme X7 Max 5G in real-world use?
The Oppo A5 Pro can reach 45% charge in 20 minutes, while the X7 Max 5G reaches 50% in 16 minutes. While the X7 Max 5G is slightly faster initially, the A5 Pro’s 80W will likely provide a more significant advantage when charging from lower percentages and completing a full charge.
❓ Is the lack of detailed camera information for the Oppo A5 Pro a cause for concern?
Yes, the absence of camera specs is a significant drawback. It suggests Oppo may not be prioritizing camera performance as a key selling point for this device, or they are reserving those details for a later reveal. Potential buyers should proceed with caution until more information becomes available.
