The Oppo A5 Pro (China) and Huawei nova 5 Pro represent distinct approaches to the mid-range smartphone market. The A5 Pro, leveraging the newer Mediatek Dimensity 7300, aims for efficiency and modern features. Conversely, the nova 5 Pro, powered by the Kirin 980, relies on a more established, though older, chipset and a focus on camera capabilities and display quality. This comparison dissects their strengths and weaknesses to help you choose the right device.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Oppo A5 Pro emerges as the better choice. Its Dimensity 7300 chipset, built on a 4nm process, offers superior performance and efficiency compared to the Kirin 980’s 7nm node. While the nova 5 Pro boasts a better display contrast ratio and endurance rating, the A5 Pro’s faster charging and modern architecture provide a more compelling overall package.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 19, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, December 24 | 2019, June. Released 2019, June |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, December 27 | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back (Crystal Shield Glass) | Glass front, glass back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 161.5 x 74.9 x 7.6 mm (6.36 x 2.95 x 0.30 in) | 157.4 x 74.8 x 7.3 mm (6.20 x 2.94 x 0.29 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 180 g or 186 g (6.35 oz) | 171 g (6.03 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.39 inches, 100.2 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 600 nits (typ), 1200 nits (HBM) | OLED |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A76 & 2x1.92 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) | Kirin 980 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Mali-G76 MP10 |
| OS | Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 9.0 (Pie), EMUI 9.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | Nano Memory (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), 1/2.88", PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
16 MP, f/2.2, (wide)
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | - | 19 MP, f/2.0, 25mm (wide), 1/2.3", predictive PDAF, Laser AF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, PD, 45% in 20 min | 40W wired, 85% in 30 min |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 6000 mAh | Li-Po 3500 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Red, Purple | Black, Purple, Green, Orange |
| Models | PKP110 | SEA-AL10, SEA-TL10 |
| Price | About 260 EUR | About 390 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality | - |
Noise -93.5dB / Crosstalk -92.7dB |
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 73h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1223:1 (nominal), 3.818 (sunlight) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
Voice 62dB / Noise 65dB / Ring 73dB
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 170766 (v8)
GeekBench: 808 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 21fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo A5 Pro (China)
- Faster 80W charging for quick top-ups
- More efficient Dimensity 7300 chipset (4nm)
- Modern CPU architecture (Cortex-A78 cores)
- Display specifications are unknown
- Camera details are limited
Huawei nova 5 Pro
- Excellent display contrast ratio (1223:1)
- Long battery endurance (73 hours)
- Good sunlight visibility (3.818 contrast ratio)
- Older Kirin 980 chipset (7nm)
- Slower 40W charging
Display Comparison
The Huawei nova 5 Pro distinguishes itself with a contrast ratio of 1223:1 (nominal) and 3.818 under sunlight, suggesting excellent visibility in bright conditions. However, the Oppo A5 Pro’s display specifications are not provided, making a direct comparison difficult. Given Oppo’s typical display quality, it likely prioritizes color accuracy and brightness, but may not match the nova 5 Pro’s sunlight legibility. The absence of refresh rate data for both phones suggests they likely utilize standard 60Hz panels, a common trait in this price segment.
Camera Comparison
The Huawei nova 5 Pro’s camera capabilities are not fully detailed in the provided data, but its history suggests a strong emphasis on image processing and detail capture. The Oppo A5 Pro’s camera specifications are also missing. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is impossible. However, given the trend towards larger sensors in modern smartphones, the A5 Pro likely incorporates a more advanced camera system. The absence of details regarding OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on either device makes it difficult to assess low-light performance. It's reasonable to assume Huawei's image processing algorithms will provide a distinct look, potentially favoring vibrant colors, while Oppo may aim for a more natural aesthetic.
Performance
The Oppo A5 Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4nm) represents a significant architectural leap over the Huawei nova 5 Pro’s Kirin 980 (7nm). The 4nm process node inherently delivers better power efficiency and thermal performance, allowing the Dimensity 7300 to sustain peak performance for longer periods. The CPU configuration – Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) – provides a strong balance of performance and efficiency. The Kirin 980’s Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A76 & 2x1.92 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) utilizes older Cortex-A76 cores, which, while capable, are less efficient than the A78 cores found in the Dimensity 7300. This translates to a noticeable advantage for the A5 Pro in demanding tasks like gaming and video editing.
Battery Life
The Huawei nova 5 Pro boasts an endurance rating of 73 hours, indicating excellent battery life. Its 40W wired charging can reach 85% in 30 minutes. The Oppo A5 Pro, with its 80W wired charging, significantly outperforms the nova 5 Pro in charging speed, achieving 45% charge in just 20 minutes. While the A5 Pro’s battery capacity is unknown, the faster charging mitigates concerns about potential capacity differences. The Dimensity 7300’s improved power efficiency also contributes to potentially comparable real-world battery life, despite the nova 5 Pro’s higher endurance rating.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A5 Pro (China) if you prioritize future-proof performance, faster charging speeds, and a more efficient processor for extended gaming or demanding applications. Buy the Huawei nova 5 Pro if you value a higher contrast display for media consumption and a slightly longer battery life, and are less concerned with having the absolute latest chipset technology.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Dimensity 7300 in the Oppo A5 Pro handle graphically intensive games like Genshin Impact smoothly?
Yes, the Dimensity 7300 is a capable chipset designed to handle demanding games like Genshin Impact. Its modern architecture and efficient 4nm process allow for sustained performance and reduced thermal throttling, resulting in a smoother gaming experience compared to the older Kirin 980.
❓ How does the 80W charging on the Oppo A5 Pro compare to other fast charging solutions in terms of heat generation?
While 80W charging is very fast, Oppo incorporates intelligent charging algorithms to minimize heat generation. The system dynamically adjusts the charging rate based on battery temperature and usage patterns, preventing overheating and prolonging battery lifespan. It's generally safer than unregulated fast charging solutions.
❓ Is the Huawei nova 5 Pro still a viable option in 2024, considering its older chipset?
The Huawei nova 5 Pro remains a functional device, particularly for users prioritizing battery life and a good display. However, its Kirin 980 chipset is showing its age, and it will likely struggle with newer, more demanding applications and games compared to the Oppo A5 Pro's Dimensity 7300.
