The Oppo A5 Pro (China) represents a newer generation of mid-range smartphone technology, boasting the Mediatek Dimensity 7300. We pit it against the Honor 20 Pro, a well-regarded device powered by the older Kirin 980, to determine which offers the best experience in 2024, considering advancements in processing power and charging technology.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Oppo A5 Pro emerges as the superior choice. Its Dimensity 7300 chipset, built on a more efficient 4nm process, delivers a noticeable performance uplift and improved thermal management compared to the Honor 20 Pro’s 7nm Kirin 980. The significantly faster 80W charging also provides a substantial convenience advantage.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, December 24 | 2019, May. Released 2019, July |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, December 27 | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back (Crystal Shield Glass) | Glass front, glass back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 161.5 x 74.9 x 7.6 mm (6.36 x 2.95 x 0.30 in) | 154.6 x 74 x 8.4 mm (6.09 x 2.91 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 180 g or 186 g (6.35 oz) | 182 g (6.42 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~412 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.26 inches, 96.2 cm2 (~84.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 600 nits (typ), 1200 nits (HBM) | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A76 & 2x1.92 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) | Kirin 980 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Mali-G76 MP10 |
| OS | Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 9.0 (Pie), Magic 2.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), 1/2.88", PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 48 MP, f/1.4, 28mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.4, 80mm (telephoto), 1/4.4", PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom
16 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/3.1"
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| | - | 32-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, aptX HD, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, PD, 45% in 20 min | 22.5W wired, 50% in 30 min |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 6000 mAh | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Red, Purple | Phantom Blue, Phantom Black, Icelandic Illusion |
| Models | PKP110 | YAL-AL10, YAL-L41 |
| Price | About 260 EUR | About 470 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality | - |
Noise -92.9dB / Crosstalk -46.8dB |
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 104h |
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Loudspeaker | - |
Voice 68dB / Noise 72dB / Ring 87dB |
Oppo A5 Pro (China)
- Faster charging (80W)
- More efficient 4nm chipset
- Likely improved CPU/GPU performance
- Display specs currently unknown
- Camera specs currently unknown
Honor 20 Pro
- Excellent battery endurance (104h)
- Solid display contrast ratio (1222:1)
- Proven camera system
- Slower charging (22.5W)
- Older 7nm chipset
Display Comparison
The Honor 20 Pro’s display, measured at 507 nits peak brightness and a 1222:1 contrast ratio, provides a solid visual experience. However, the Oppo A5 Pro’s display specifications are currently unknown. Given Oppo’s recent trends, it’s likely to feature a higher refresh rate and potentially OLED technology, offering richer colors and deeper blacks. Without specific data, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner, but the Honor 20 Pro’s contrast ratio is a strong point, while the A5 Pro likely benefits from newer panel tech.
Camera Comparison
Both devices feature photo and video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are limited. The Honor 20 Pro’s camera system is known for its versatility, but without knowing the sensor sizes and apertures of the Oppo A5 Pro, a direct comparison is challenging. The presence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on either device would be a significant advantage for low-light photography and video recording. It’s reasonable to assume the A5 Pro benefits from newer image processing algorithms, potentially leading to improved dynamic range and detail. We'll need more data to assess the A5 Pro's camera performance.
Performance
The Mediatek Dimensity 7300 in the Oppo A5 Pro, fabricated on a 4nm process, represents a significant architectural leap over the Honor 20 Pro’s 7nm Kirin 980. The Dimensity 7300’s octa-core configuration (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) is designed for improved efficiency and sustained performance. While the Kirin 980’s (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A76 & 2x1.92 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) CPU boasts slightly higher peak clock speeds on its prime cores, the Dimensity 7300’s newer architecture and smaller node size translate to better thermal management and potentially longer periods of peak performance. This benefits gamers and users running demanding applications.
Battery Life
The Honor 20 Pro boasts an impressive endurance rating of 104 hours, indicating excellent battery life. However, the Oppo A5 Pro compensates with significantly faster charging – 80W wired, achieving 45% charge in just 20 minutes. The Honor 20 Pro’s 22.5W charging takes 30 minutes to reach 50%. While the Honor 20 Pro excels in longevity, the Oppo A5 Pro’s rapid charging mitigates the inconvenience of needing to charge less frequently, offering a more convenient user experience.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A5 Pro (China) if you prioritize performance for demanding apps and games, and value incredibly fast charging speeds. This phone is ideal for users who frequently multitask or enjoy mobile gaming. Buy the Honor 20 Pro if you are seeking a phone with proven endurance – its 104-hour battery rating is still respectable – and are less concerned with having the absolute latest chipset, potentially benefiting from a lower price point.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Mediatek Dimensity 7300 in the Oppo A5 Pro generate excessive heat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Dimensity 7300’s 4nm process is designed for improved thermal efficiency compared to the Kirin 980’s 7nm process. This means the Oppo A5 Pro is likely to experience less throttling and maintain higher sustained performance during extended gaming, resulting in a more consistent and enjoyable gaming experience.
❓ Is the 22.5W charging on the Honor 20 Pro slow by today's standards, and will it significantly impact my daily usage?
Yes, 22.5W charging is relatively slow compared to the 80W charging offered by the Oppo A5 Pro. While not unusable, it will take considerably longer to fully charge the Honor 20 Pro, potentially requiring overnight charging. This is a key area where the Oppo A5 Pro offers a significant convenience advantage.
❓ How does the CPU architecture of the Dimensity 7300 compare to the Kirin 980 in terms of real-world application performance?
The Dimensity 7300 utilizes newer Cortex-A78 cores, which offer improved performance per clock cycle compared to the Kirin 980’s Cortex-A76 cores. This translates to faster app launch times, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive user experience, particularly in demanding applications.
