The Oppo A5 Pro 4G and Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G represent distinct priorities in the budget smartphone space. The Oppo focuses on maximizing battery longevity, boasting an impressive 57:26h endurance, while the Poco prioritizes future-proofing with 5G connectivity and a more modern chipset. This comparison dissects these trade-offs to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing longevity and consistent performance, the Oppo A5 Pro 4G emerges as the winner. Its exceptional 57:26h battery endurance and efficient Snapdragon 6s Gen 1 chipset outweigh the Poco M3 Pro 5G’s 5G connectivity, especially given the limited 5G infrastructure in many regions.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 - International | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, March 12 | 2021, May 19 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, March 17 | Available. Released 2021, May 22 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.8 x 75.5 x 7.8 mm (6.49 x 2.97 x 0.31 in) | 161.8 x 75.3 x 8.9 mm (6.37 x 2.96 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 194 g (6.84 oz) | 190 g (6.70 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i or AGC DT-Star D+, Mohs level 4 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1604 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~264 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.2 cm2 (~86.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~83.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 1000 nits (HBM) | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 400 nits (typ), 500 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.1 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM-6115 Snapdragon 6s 4G Gen1 (11 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 11, MIUI 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | - |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, PD | 18W wired |
| Type | 5800 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Mocha Brown (Mocha Chocolate), Olive Green (Moss Green), Silk Blue (Feather Blue) | Poco Yellow, Power Black, Cool Blue |
| Models | CPH2711 | M2103K19PG, M2103K19PI, M2103K19PY |
| Price | About 170 EUR | About 140 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.94 W/kg (head) 1.06 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.54 W/kg (head) 0.90 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 121h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1475:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-27.9 LUFS (Good)
|
| EU LABEL |
|---|
| Battery | 57:26h endurance, 1600 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Oppo A5 Pro 4G
- Exceptional battery life (57:26h endurance)
- Fast 45W charging with PD
- High battery cycle count (1600 cycles)
- Lacks 5G connectivity
- Chipset performance is less powerful than the Poco
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
- 5G connectivity for faster data speeds
- More modern chipset (Dimensity 700)
- Higher display brightness (536 nits)
- Significantly shorter battery life (121h endurance)
- Slower 18W charging
- Limited battery cycle count (unspecified)
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G boasts a measured peak brightness of 536 nits and a 1475:1 contrast ratio, suggesting a visually acceptable, though not exceptional, viewing experience. While the Oppo A5 Pro 4G’s display specifications are not provided, the Poco’s contrast ratio is a key metric, indicating good black levels and color separation. The lack of information on the Oppo’s panel type (LCD vs AMOLED) and refresh rate makes a direct comparison difficult, but the Poco’s brightness is a clear advantage for outdoor visibility.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but lack specific details regarding sensor size, aperture, or image stabilization. Without this information, a meaningful camera comparison is impossible. The absence of details suggests neither phone is positioned as a camera-centric device. It's reasonable to assume both will perform adequately in good lighting conditions, but struggle in low-light scenarios. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on the Poco is likely a marketing feature with limited practical utility.
Performance
The Poco M3 Pro 5G’s Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7nm) chipset, featuring 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, offers a performance edge over the Oppo A5 Pro 4G’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 1 (11nm) with its 4x2.1 GHz Cortex-A73 and 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. The 7nm process node of the Dimensity 700 generally translates to better power efficiency and thermal performance. However, the Oppo’s chipset is still capable of handling everyday tasks smoothly, and the difference will be most noticeable in demanding applications like gaming or video editing. The Poco’s 5G modem is a significant advantage for future-proofing, but its real-world benefit depends on network availability.
Battery Life
The Oppo A5 Pro 4G dominates in battery endurance with a staggering 57:26h rating, supported by a reported 1600 charge cycles, indicating exceptional longevity. This is a massive improvement over the Poco M3 Pro 5G’s 121h endurance. While the Poco offers 18W charging, the Oppo supports 45W wired charging with PD (Power Delivery), enabling significantly faster charging times. The Oppo’s superior battery life effectively mitigates the Poco’s faster charging, as users will simply need to charge less frequently.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A5 Pro 4G if you need a phone that will reliably last through multiple days of moderate use, and value battery life above all else. It’s ideal for travelers, field workers, or anyone who dislikes frequent charging. Buy the Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G if you prioritize 5G connectivity for faster data speeds, and are willing to compromise on battery life and potentially deal with more frequent charging cycles. It’s a good choice for users in areas with robust 5G coverage and who frequently stream or download content.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ How much faster is the Oppo A5 Pro 4G to charge from 0-100% compared to the Poco M3 Pro 5G?
The Oppo A5 Pro 4G’s 45W charging with PD will significantly reduce charging times compared to the Poco M3 Pro 5G’s 18W charging. While exact times depend on various factors, the Oppo is expected to fully charge in approximately 60-75 minutes, while the Poco will likely take over 2 hours.
❓ Will the Poco M3 Pro 5G’s 5G connectivity be useful in my area?
The usefulness of the Poco M3 Pro 5G’s 5G connectivity depends entirely on 5G network availability in your location. Check with your mobile carrier to confirm 5G coverage before prioritizing this feature. If 5G is not available, you will be limited to 4G speeds, negating the benefit of the Dimensity 700’s 5G modem.
❓ Is the difference in chipset performance between the Snapdragon 6s Gen 1 and Dimensity 700 noticeable for everyday tasks?
For typical smartphone usage like browsing, social media, and messaging, the difference in performance between the two chipsets will be minimal. However, more demanding tasks like gaming or video editing will likely run smoother on the Poco M3 Pro 5G due to the Dimensity 700’s more powerful CPU and GPU.
