The Oppo A5 Pro 4G and OnePlus Nord CE 5G represent distinct approaches to the affordable smartphone market. The A5 Pro prioritizes exceptional battery endurance, while the Nord CE 5G offers the appeal of 5G connectivity and a more modern chipset. This comparison dissects their strengths and weaknesses to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing all-day (and multi-day) battery life, the Oppo A5 Pro 4G is the clear winner, boasting an astounding 57:26h endurance. However, if 5G connectivity and a slightly more powerful processor are essential, the OnePlus Nord CE 5G provides a compelling alternative, despite its significantly shorter battery life.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 - International | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 39, 40, 41, 66 - Europe |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Europe |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 78 SA/NSA - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, March 12 | 2021, June 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, March 17 | Available. Released 2021, June 11 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.8 x 75.5 x 7.8 mm (6.49 x 2.97 x 0.31 in) | 159.2 x 73.5 x 7.9 mm (6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 194 g (6.84 oz) | 170 g (6.00 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i or AGC DT-Star D+, Mohs level 4 | - |
| Resolution | 720 x 1604 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~264 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~410 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.2 cm2 (~86.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.3 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 1000 nits (HBM) | Fluid AMOLED, 90Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.1 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 570) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM-6115 Snapdragon 6s 4G Gen1 (11 nm) | Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, OxygenOS 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.3, 119˚ (ultrawide)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, PD | 30W wired, 70% in 30 min |
| Type | 5800 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Mocha Brown (Mocha Chocolate), Olive Green (Moss Green), Silk Blue (Feather Blue) | Blue Void, Charkoal Ink, Silver Ray |
| Models | CPH2711 | EB2101, EB2103 |
| Price | About 170 EUR | About 250 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 117h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-29.9 LUFS (Average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 318672 (v8) | 391770 (v9)
GeekBench: 1812 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
| EU LABEL |
|---|
| Battery | 57:26h endurance, 1600 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Oppo A5 Pro 4G
- Exceptional battery life (57:26h endurance)
- Fast 45W charging with PD support
- High battery cycle count (1600 cycles)
- Older Snapdragon 6s Gen 1 chipset
- Lacks 5G connectivity
OnePlus Nord CE 5G
- 5G connectivity for faster data speeds
- More powerful Snapdragon 750G chipset
- Brighter display (607 nits)
- Significantly shorter battery life (117h endurance)
- Slower charging speed (30W)
Display Comparison
The OnePlus Nord CE 5G boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured 607 nits, compared to the Oppo A5 Pro 4G (brightness data unavailable). This difference is noticeable in direct sunlight. While the Nord CE 5G’s contrast ratio is listed as ‘Infinite (nominal)’ – typical for OLED panels – the A5 Pro’s panel characteristics are unknown. The Nord CE 5G’s display is geared towards media consumption, while the A5 Pro’s display likely prioritizes power efficiency.
Camera Comparison
Both devices offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are limited. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. The Nord CE 5G likely benefits from Qualcomm’s image signal processor (ISP) within the Snapdragon 750G, potentially offering improved image processing and low-light performance. The A5 Pro’s camera performance is likely adequate for casual photography, but may struggle in challenging conditions. The absence of detailed camera specs suggests neither phone is a primary focus for photography enthusiasts.
Performance
The OnePlus Nord CE 5G’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G (8nm) represents a significant architectural leap over the Oppo A5 Pro 4G’s Snapdragon 6s Gen 1 (11nm). The 750G’s Kryo 570 cores, with a 2x2.2 GHz configuration, offer a performance advantage in CPU-intensive tasks and gaming. The 8nm process also contributes to better thermal efficiency. However, the A5 Pro’s Cortex-A73 cores provide a respectable level of performance for everyday tasks. The Nord CE 5G’s 5G modem is a key differentiator, enabling faster data speeds where available.
Battery Life
The Oppo A5 Pro 4G dominates in battery endurance with a remarkable 57:26h rating, supported by a reported 1600 charge cycles, indicating long-term battery health. This is drastically superior to the OnePlus Nord CE 5G’s 117h endurance. While the Nord CE 5G offers 30W charging with a 70% charge in 30 minutes, the A5 Pro’s 45W charging is faster. The A5 Pro’s superior endurance effectively negates the Nord CE 5G’s faster charging speed for most users, as it simply requires charging less frequently.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A5 Pro 4G if you need a phone that can reliably last through two full days of moderate use, or if you frequently find yourself away from a charger. It’s ideal for travelers, field workers, or anyone who simply dislikes battery anxiety. Buy the OnePlus Nord CE 5G if you prioritize 5G network access, enjoy streaming video, or play mobile games, and are comfortable charging your phone daily. It’s a better fit for users in areas with strong 5G coverage.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ How much faster is the OnePlus Nord CE 5G's charging compared to the Oppo A5 Pro 4G in real-world use?
While the Nord CE 5G reaches 70% charge in 30 minutes, the Oppo A5 Pro 4G's slower charging is less of a concern due to its vastly superior battery life. Most users will find they need to charge the A5 Pro far less frequently, minimizing the impact of the slower charging speed.
❓ Will the Oppo A5 Pro 4G struggle with demanding games like PUBG or Call of Duty?
The Snapdragon 6s Gen 1 is capable of running PUBG and Call of Duty, but you may need to lower graphics settings to achieve smooth frame rates. The Nord CE 5G’s Snapdragon 750G will provide a noticeably better gaming experience with higher settings and more consistent performance.
❓ Is the 5G connectivity on the OnePlus Nord CE 5G worth the trade-off in battery life?
That depends on your location and usage. If you live in an area with robust 5G coverage and frequently stream high-resolution video or download large files, the 5G connectivity could be a significant benefit. However, if 5G is unavailable or you primarily use Wi-Fi, the A5 Pro’s battery life is likely a more valuable feature.
❓ How does the 1600 charge cycle claim of the Oppo A5 Pro 4G translate to real-world longevity?
The 1600 charge cycle claim suggests the A5 Pro 4G’s battery is designed to retain a significant portion of its capacity even after years of regular use. This is a major advantage over phones with lower-quality batteries that degrade more quickly.
