Oppo A5 Pro 4G vs. Motorola Moto G50 5G: A Deep Dive into Battery, Performance, and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing longevity and rapid replenishment, the Oppo A5 Pro 4G emerges as the winner. Its remarkable 57:26h endurance and 45W charging significantly outweigh the Moto G50 5G’s 5G capability, especially given the limited 5G infrastructure in many regions.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo A5 Pro 4G | Motorola Moto G50 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 - International | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - Australia |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 - Australia |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Australia |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, March 12 | 2021, August 25 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, March 17 | Available. Released 2021, August 25 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164.8 x 75.5 x 7.8 mm (6.49 x 2.97 x 0.31 in) | 167 x 76.4 x 9.3 mm (6.57 x 3.01 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 194 g (6.84 oz) | 206 g (7.27 oz) |
| - | Water-repellent design | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i or AGC DT-Star D+, Mohs level 4 | - |
| Resolution | 720 x 1604 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~264 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.2 cm2 (~86.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.8 cm2 (~80.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 1000 nits (HBM) | IPS LCD, 90Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.1 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM-6115 Snapdragon 6s 4G Gen1 (11 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 11 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 13 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS | GPS |
| Radio | Unspecified | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, PD | 15W wired |
| Type | 5800 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Mocha Brown (Mocha Chocolate), Olive Green (Moss Green), Silk Blue (Feather Blue) | Meteorite Grey |
| Models | CPH2711 | XT2149-1 |
| Price | About 170 EUR | About 170 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 57:26h endurance, 1600 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Oppo A5 Pro 4G
- Exceptional battery life (57:26h endurance)
- Ultra-fast 45W charging with PD
- Long battery lifespan (1600 cycles)
- Lacks 5G connectivity
- Older 11nm chipset
Motorola Moto G50 5G
- 5G connectivity for future-proofing
- More modern 7nm chipset
- Potentially better sustained performance
- Significantly shorter battery life
- Slow 15W charging
- Likely lower battery lifespan
Display Comparison
Display specifications are not provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the price points, both likely utilize LCD panels. The focus here shifts to internal components. The Oppo’s longevity suggests a power-efficient display is employed, while the Moto G50’s 5G modem will inherently draw more power, potentially impacting screen-on time.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are absent, making a meaningful comparison impossible. Both phones likely feature multi-camera setups geared towards social media sharing. Without sensor size or aperture information, it’s safe to assume image quality will be comparable within their respective price brackets. The absence of high-end features suggests a focus on basic photography capabilities.
Performance
The Motorola Moto G50 5G’s Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7nm) boasts a more modern fabrication process than the Oppo A5 Pro 4G’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen1 (11nm). This generally translates to improved power efficiency and thermal performance. The Moto G50’s CPU configuration – 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 – offers a slight edge in peak performance over the Oppo’s 4x2.1 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53. However, the Snapdragon 6s Gen1 is a well-optimized chip, and real-world performance differences may be less pronounced than the specs suggest. The 7nm process of the Dimensity 700 should allow for sustained performance under load, while the 11nm Snapdragon may throttle more quickly.
Battery Life
The Oppo A5 Pro 4G’s battery endurance of 57:26h is a standout feature, dwarfing what is typically seen in this price range. This is coupled with 45W wired charging with PD, enabling incredibly fast top-ups. The Motorola Moto G50 5G, lacking specific endurance data, will likely offer significantly less battery life due to the power demands of its 5G modem. Its 15W charging is considerably slower, requiring a much longer time to reach a full charge. The Oppo’s 1600 charge cycles also suggest a longer lifespan for the battery itself.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A5 Pro 4G if you need a phone that can reliably last through two full days of moderate use and charges incredibly quickly. This is ideal for travelers, busy professionals, or anyone who dislikes frequent charging. Buy the Motorola Moto G50 5G if you prioritize future-proofing with 5G connectivity and are willing to compromise on battery life and charging speed for that feature. This is a good choice for early adopters or those in areas with strong 5G coverage.