The Oppo A5 Energy and Realme C55 represent compelling options in the crowded budget smartphone market. While both aim to deliver essential features at an accessible price, they diverge significantly in their core hardware. The A5 Energy boasts the newer, more efficient Mediatek Dimensity 6300, while the C55 relies on the established Helio G88. This comparison will dissect these differences, revealing which device offers the best value for your money.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Oppo A5 Energy emerges as the stronger choice. Its Dimensity 6300 chipset provides a noticeable performance uplift over the Realme C55’s Helio G88, translating to smoother multitasking and a more responsive user experience. While both phones offer similar battery endurance, the A5 Energy’s faster 45W charging is a significant advantage.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, March 18 | 2023, March 07 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, March 21 | Available. Released 2023, March 08 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.8 x 75.5 x 7.9 mm (6.49 x 2.97 x 0.31 in) | 165.6 x 75.9 x 7.9 mm (6.52 x 2.99 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 194 g or 196 g (6.84 oz) | 189.5 g (6.70 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Crystal Shield Glass | - |
| Resolution | 720 x 1604 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~264 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~392 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.2 cm2 (~86.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.72 inches, 109.0 cm2 (~86.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 1000 nits (HBM) | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 680 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6 nm) | Mediatek MT6769H Helio G88 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| OS | Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 13, Realme UI 4.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, (wide), 1/2.0", PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 8 MP, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 25mm (wide) | 8 MP, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, BLE Audio | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes, 360˚ (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, 33W UFCS, PD | 33W wired, 50% in 29 min |
| Type | 5800 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Flower Pink, Mocha Brown (Mocha Chocolate), Jade Green (Moss Green) | Sun Shower, Rainy Night, Rainforest |
| Models | PKV110 | RMX3710 |
| Price | About 150 EUR | ₹ 8,399 |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 123h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1264:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-31.8 LUFS (Below average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 257263 (v9)
GeekBench: 1452 (v5.1), 1413 (v6)
GFXBench: 9fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo A5 Energy
- Superior chipset performance with the Dimensity 6300
- Faster 45W charging for quicker top-ups
- More efficient 6nm process node for better thermal management
- Display specifications currently unknown
- Camera details are limited
Realme C55
- Brighter display with 659 nits peak brightness
- Proven reliability of the Helio G88 chipset
- Competitive price point
- Older and less efficient Helio G88 chipset
- Slower 33W charging
- Limited performance headroom for demanding tasks
Display Comparison
Both the Oppo A5 Energy and Realme C55 share a 1264:1 contrast ratio, suggesting similar visual pop. However, the Realme C55’s measured peak brightness of 659 nits provides a brighter viewing experience, particularly outdoors. While both displays are adequate for everyday use, the A5 Energy’s display specifications are currently unknown, making it difficult to assess its color accuracy or viewing angles relative to the C55. The lack of high refresh rate panels on either device is typical for this price segment.
Camera Comparison
Both devices feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are lacking. Without information on sensor size, aperture, or image processing algorithms, a direct comparison is challenging. It’s reasonable to assume both phones will perform adequately in well-lit conditions, but image quality will likely suffer in low-light scenarios. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on the C55 is unlikely to significantly enhance the photography experience, as these sensors typically lack the resolution and dynamic range to produce detailed images.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo A5 Energy’s Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6nm) represents a significant architectural leap over the Realme C55’s Helio G88 (12nm). The Dimensity 6300 utilizes more efficient Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.4 GHz, paired with Cortex-A55 cores at 2.0 GHz, compared to the C55’s 2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 and 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 configuration. The 6nm process node of the Dimensity 6300 also translates to better thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of performance throttling during sustained workloads. This means the A5 Energy will likely maintain higher frame rates in games and handle multitasking more smoothly.
Battery Life
Both the Oppo A5 Energy and Realme C55 achieve an endurance rating of 123 hours, indicating comparable battery life under similar usage patterns. However, the A5 Energy gains a significant advantage in charging speed with its 45W wired charging, supplemented by 33W UFCS and PD support. The Realme C55 is limited to 33W charging, taking approximately 29 minutes to reach 50% capacity. The A5 Energy’s faster charging will minimize downtime and provide a more convenient user experience.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A5 Energy if you prioritize performance and future-proofing, especially if you frequently use demanding apps or enjoy mobile gaming. Its more modern chipset will handle these tasks with greater ease. Buy the Realme C55 if you are on an extremely tight budget and prioritize a known quantity with a decent, if not spectacular, experience. The C55 is a reliable option for basic smartphone tasks like calling, texting, and light social media use.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Dimensity 6300 in the Oppo A5 Energy handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile smoothly?
The Mediatek Dimensity 6300 is a significant upgrade over the Helio G88. While it won't deliver flagship-level performance, it should comfortably handle PUBG Mobile at medium settings with stable frame rates. The 6nm process also helps mitigate thermal throttling, maintaining performance during extended gaming sessions.
❓ How much faster is the 45W charging on the Oppo A5 Energy compared to the Realme C55's 33W charging in real-world use?
The Realme C55 takes approximately 29 minutes to reach 50% charge. While a full 0-100% time for the A5 Energy isn't specified, the 45W charging will demonstrably reduce overall charging time. Expect a noticeable difference, potentially shaving off 15-20 minutes for a full charge, depending on battery temperature and usage.
❓ Is the Realme C55 a good option for someone who primarily uses their phone for calls, texts, and social media?
Yes, the Realme C55 is a perfectly adequate choice for basic smartphone tasks. The Helio G88 is capable of handling everyday applications without issue. However, if you anticipate using more demanding apps or want a phone that will remain responsive for longer, the Oppo A5 Energy is a better investment.
