The Oppo A5 (China) and vivo Y78t represent a fascinating intersection in the competitive mid-range smartphone market. Both devices leverage the Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 chipset, aiming to deliver a smooth user experience without breaking the bank. This comparison dissects the subtle differences between these two phones, focusing on areas like charging speed and potential real-world performance variations.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing slightly faster charging and potential software optimizations, the Oppo A5 (China) emerges as the winner. However, the difference is minimal, and the vivo Y78t remains a compelling option, especially if found at a lower price point. Both offer excellent value for their segment.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, March 18 | 2023, October 20 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, March 26 | Available. Released 2023, October 24 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 161.6 x 74.5 x 7.7 mm (6.36 x 2.93 x 0.30 in) | 164.6 x 75.8 x 9.1 mm (6.48 x 2.98 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 185 g or 189 g (6.53 oz) | 199.6 g (7.05 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Crystal Shield Glass | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1080 x 2388 pixels (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~89.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.64 inches, 106.8 cm2 (~85.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 600 nits (typ), 1200 nits (HBM) | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6450 Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM6450 Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 710 | Adreno 710 |
| OS | Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 13, OriginOS 3 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 25mm (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, BLE Audio | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1c), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, PD | 44W wired |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 6500 mAh | 6000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Pink | Black, Blue, Silver |
| Models | PKQ110 | - |
| Price | About 160 EUR | About 200 EUR |
Oppo A5 (China)
- Slightly faster 45W charging with PD
- Potential for optimized software experience with ColorOS
- Identical Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 performance
- Battery capacity not specified
- Camera specifications unknown
vivo Y78t
- Identical Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 performance
- Potential for a lower price point
- Funtouch OS software experience
- Slower 44W charging
- Battery capacity not specified
Display Comparison
Both the Oppo A5 (China) and vivo Y78t likely feature LCD panels, common in this price segment. While specific details like resolution and refresh rate are missing, the focus here is on charging. Display quality will likely be similar, with color accuracy and peak brightness being key differentiators not specified in the provided data. Bezels are also likely comparable, contributing minimally to a decisive advantage for either device.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is challenging. Both phones likely feature multi-camera setups, but the quality will hinge on sensor size, lens aperture, and image processing algorithms. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on either device is unlikely to significantly impact image quality; these are often included for marketing purposes rather than practical use. The main sensor's capabilities will be the determining factor, but this information is currently unavailable.
Performance
The core of both devices is the Qualcomm SM6450 Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4nm). This chipset features an octa-core CPU configuration with 4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 and 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, ensuring comparable processing power for everyday tasks and moderate gaming. The 4nm process node is crucial, offering improved power efficiency compared to older, larger-node chipsets, translating to better battery life and reduced thermal throttling during sustained workloads. RAM configurations are not specified, but LPDDR5 or LPDDR4X are likely, impacting multitasking performance. Given the identical chipset, real-world performance differences will be minimal and largely dependent on software optimization.
Battery Life
The battery capacity is not specified for either device. However, the charging speeds are a key differentiator: the Oppo A5 (China) supports 45W wired charging with PD, while the vivo Y78t is limited to 44W. While a 1W difference seems small, it can translate to a slightly faster 0-100% charge time for the Oppo A5. The efficiency of the charging circuitry and battery capacity will ultimately determine the actual charging time, but Oppo’s slightly higher wattage gives it a marginal advantage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A5 (China) if you need the fastest possible charging speeds within this price bracket and appreciate Oppo’s ColorOS software experience. Buy the vivo Y78t if you prefer vivo’s Funtouch OS, or if you find it available at a significantly discounted price, making it the more budget-friendly choice. Both are excellent for everyday tasks and light gaming.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile smoothly on either device?
The Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 is capable of running PUBG Mobile, but expect to use medium graphics settings for a consistently smooth experience. Thermal throttling could become a factor during extended gaming sessions, potentially leading to frame drops. Both phones will likely perform similarly in this regard.
❓ Does the difference in charging wattage (45W vs 44W) translate to a significant real-world charging time difference?
The 1W difference in charging wattage is relatively small. While the Oppo A5 (China) will likely charge slightly faster, the difference will likely be in the range of a few minutes for a full charge. Battery capacity plays a larger role in overall charging time.
❓ Are software updates guaranteed for both the Oppo A5 (China) and vivo Y78t?
Software update policies vary by manufacturer and region. Oppo and vivo typically provide updates for a limited period, but the exact duration and frequency are not guaranteed. Check the official websites for the latest information regarding software support for each device.
