The Oppo A5 4G and Motorola Moto G8 Power represent distinct approaches to the budget smartphone market. The A5 4G prioritizes fast charging and a more recent chipset, while the G8 Power aims for longevity and a balanced feature set. This comparison dissects their strengths and weaknesses to determine which device delivers the best value for your money.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Oppo A5 4G emerges as the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 6s Gen 1 chipset provides a noticeable performance edge, and the incredibly fast 45W charging significantly reduces downtime. While the Moto G8 Power boasts a decent contrast ratio, it can't match the A5 4G's overall package.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - version 1 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 - version 1 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 28, 66 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat13 600/100 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, May 15 | 2020, February 07. Released 2020, April 16 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, May 15 | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic back, aluminum frame (6000 series) |
| Dimensions | 165.7 x 76.2 x 8 mm (6.52 x 3.00 x 0.31 in) | 156 x 75.8 x 9.6 mm (6.14 x 2.98 x 0.38 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 193 g (6.81 oz) | 197 g (6.95 oz) |
| | - | Water-repellent coating |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i, Mohs level 4 | - |
| Resolution | 720 x 1604 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~264 ppi density) | 1080 x 2300 pixels (~399 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.2 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 100.7 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 1000 nits (HBM) | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.1 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM-6115 Snapdragon 6s 4G Gen1 (11 nm) | Qualcomm SDM665 Snapdragon 665 (11 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 10, upgradable to Android 11 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 4GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 32GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
2 MP, f/2.4, (wide) | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 16 MP, f/1.7, (wide), 1/2.8", 1.12µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, (telephoto), 1/4.0", 1.12µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS) |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes, (market/region dependent) | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, 33W PPS, 13.5W PD, 50% in 36 min | 18W wired |
| Type | 6000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Midnight Purple, Aurora Green, Mist White | Smoke Black, Capri Blue |
| Models | CPH2727 | XT2041-1, XT2041-3 |
| Price | About 150 EUR | About 180 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 136h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1466:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-24.6 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 173607 (v8)
GeekBench: 1394 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 6.6fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
| EU LABEL |
|---|
| Battery | 64:03h endurance, 1600 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Oppo A5 4G
- Significantly faster 45W charging
- More powerful Snapdragon 6s Gen 1 chipset
- Longer battery endurance (64:03h)
- Display specifications are largely unknown
- Camera details are limited
Motorola Moto G8 Power
- Respectable 1466:1 contrast ratio
- Balanced feature set for basic use
- Potentially more affordable (depending on market)
- Slower Snapdragon 665 chipset
- Significantly slower 18W charging
- Lower battery endurance (136h)
Display Comparison
Both devices share a nominal contrast ratio of 1466:1, suggesting similar visual pop. However, the context data lacks specifics on panel type, resolution, or brightness. Given Motorola’s history in this segment, the G8 Power likely utilizes an IPS LCD. The A5 4G’s display specs are missing, but its newer release date suggests a potential for slightly improved color accuracy or brightness. Without further data, it’s difficult to declare a clear winner, but the G8 Power’s contrast ratio is a positive indicator.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific details. This suggests neither device is a photography powerhouse. The absence of sensor size or aperture information makes a direct comparison impossible. It’s reasonable to assume the G8 Power, being an older model, may have a less sophisticated image processing pipeline. The A5 4G’s newer chipset *could* offer improved image signal processing (ISP) capabilities, but without concrete data, this remains speculative. The lack of detail suggests both cameras are adequate for casual snapshots but won’t impress enthusiasts.
Performance
The Oppo A5 4G’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 1 (11nm) demonstrably outperforms the Motorola Moto G8 Power’s Snapdragon 665 (11nm). The A5 4G’s CPU features a combination of Cortex-A73 and A53 cores clocked at 2.1 GHz and 1.8 GHz respectively, offering a significant uplift over the G8 Power’s Kryo 260 Gold (2.0 GHz) and Silver (1.8 GHz) cores. This translates to snappier app launches, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive user experience. While both chipsets are built on an 11nm process, the architectural improvements in the 6s Gen 1 provide a clear advantage.
Battery Life
The Oppo A5 4G boasts an impressive 64:03h endurance rating, derived from 1600 charge cycles, while the Motorola Moto G8 Power’s endurance is rated at 136h. This substantial difference highlights the A5 4G’s superior battery optimization and efficiency. Crucially, the A5 4G supports 45W wired charging, 33W PPS, and 13.5W PD, reaching 50% charge in just 36 minutes. The G8 Power is limited to 18W charging, resulting in significantly longer recharge times. While the G8 Power’s endurance is respectable, the A5 4G’s combination of longevity and rapid charging is a game-changer.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A5 4G if you need a phone that charges quickly and can handle everyday tasks with ease. It’s ideal for users who frequently use their phone throughout the day and don’t want to be tethered to a charger. Buy the Motorola Moto G8 Power if you prioritize a balanced experience and are less concerned with peak performance or rapid charging; it’s a solid option for basic smartphone use and extended battery life in less demanding scenarios.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ How much faster is the Oppo A5 4G's charging compared to the Moto G8 Power?
The Oppo A5 4G's 45W charging is dramatically faster than the Moto G8 Power's 18W charging. The A5 4G can reach 50% charge in just 36 minutes, while the G8 Power will take considerably longer – likely exceeding 90 minutes for a similar charge level.
❓ Will I notice a performance difference between the Snapdragon 6s Gen 1 and Snapdragon 665 in everyday use?
Yes, you will. The Snapdragon 6s Gen 1 in the Oppo A5 4G offers a noticeable performance improvement over the Snapdragon 665 in the Moto G8 Power. This translates to smoother app launches, faster multitasking, and a more responsive overall experience, especially when running demanding applications.
❓ Does the Oppo A5 4G support Power Delivery (PD) and Programmable Power Supply (PPS)?
Yes, the Oppo A5 4G supports both 13.5W PD and 33W PPS charging standards, in addition to its 45W wired charging. This provides greater compatibility with a wider range of chargers and accessories.
❓ Is the camera on either phone suitable for taking high-quality photos in low light?
Given the limited camera specifications, it's unlikely that either phone excels in low-light photography. Both are likely to produce noisy or blurry images in challenging lighting conditions. Neither device appears to prioritize camera performance.
